Speculation: Trade Rumors/Speculation Part X: Sather Falls Asleep on the Phone

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ra...carello-skip-practice-staal-works-on-conditio

The Rangers scouting staff led by Gorton and Clark feel Miller's game is best suited at center.

The Rangers feel Miller can play in the bottom six and work his way into the top six. The problem was Vigneault wouldn't play Miller at center. Ryan Kesler started out as a bottom six player and worked his way into the top 6 when Vigneault became the Canucks coach. Miller is better than Boyle and Moore.

The Rangers felt Kreider couldn't play in the bottom six and work his way into the top six. He was sent to the AHL and it woke him up.

At the very least this season,the Rangers should try to establish some of their young guys in the NHL. Kreider looks to be on his way. His defensive game is better too. Miller. Too bad McIlrath got hurt. His knee will be reevaluated later this week. Allen. Maybe Lindberg later in the season.

Kristo is another player I'd like to see get a look on the NHL level.
 
Much like Kreider, (and, IMO, McIlrath), Miller is a unique combination of size, skating and skill that this organization lacks, which is why I would cringe when I'd see his name tossed about in trade proposals for the latest shiny toy.

i wonder if the Jackets were asking for Miller in the Nash trade since he is a Ohio kid. im sure he is one of the few untouchables at the moment unless he really hurts the team..
 
Kristo is another player I'd like to see get a look on the NHL level.

Fast has put up pts in HFD lately, but I don't quite feel his skating is there due to all injuries. A broken leg and two knee injuries in two years is not good.

Fast is making a lot of great small plays, winning puck battles, outmuscling Ds with his balance, he should be skating like Hagelin but the intensity is just not there.

If he can have a couple if good months though, who knows...
 
Much like Kreider, (and, IMO, McIlrath), Miller is a unique combination of size, skating and skill that this organization lacks, which is why I would cringe when I'd see his name tossed about in trade proposals for the latest shiny toy.

The organization at least has them within the system. Just not all contributing on all cylinders yet. Would not trade these three at all.

I like their mental game in addition to their athletic ability, and I think as they all grow becoming men we will see more of that.

Yes the organization needs more of that, but as the shrinking violets and mercs, and no shows get weeded out, it's hopefully the Miller's Kreider's, leading the way in forming this teams identity.

I think Connor Allen will add to that.

#HockeyFocused
 
The Sather move would be to go hard for Jumbo Joe so him and Stepan platoon the 1/2 center role. Personally I would go for Stastny instead or wait out for Stamkos in 2015.

What makes you think Stamkos would be available? People said the same things about Kovalchuk, Hossa, etc. Did either of them sign with us? (there are also numerous others that this has been said about) Stamkos will not become a UFA. He will be traded & signed long before it got to that point. With Vinny L gone and St. Louis not getting any younger, it would cripple that franchise beyond belief to lose Stamkos as a UFA. Also, do you think a team that would give up significant assets for a guy like Stamkos would do that without knowing before hand they could sign him?
 
What makes you think Stamkos would be available? People said the same things about Kovalchuk, Hossa, etc. Did either of them sign with us? (there are also numerous others that this has been said about) Stamkos will not become a UFA. He will be traded & signed long before it got to that point. With Vinny L gone and St. Louis not getting any younger, it would cripple that franchise beyond belief to lose Stamkos as a UFA. Also, do you think a team that would give up significant assets for a guy like Stamkos would do that without knowing before hand they could sign him?

The chances of that happening are slim to none, but you never know. Tampa always seems to be a team that has one good year and then one bad year. Not much consistency there, though to their credit they seem to have ironed out their ownership issues.
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ra...carello-skip-practice-staal-works-on-conditio

The Rangers scouting staff led by Gorton and Clark feel Miller's game is best suited at center.

The Rangers feel Miller can play in the bottom six and work his way into the top six. The problem was Vigneault wouldn't play Miller at center. Ryan Kesler started out as a bottom six player and worked his way into the top 6 when Vigneault became the Canucks coach. Miller is better than Boyle and Moore.

The Rangers felt Kreider couldn't play in the bottom six and work his way into the top six. He was sent to the AHL and it woke him up.

At the very least this season,the Rangers should try to establish some of their young guys in the NHL. Kreider looks to be on his way. His defensive game is better too. Miller. Too bad McIlrath got hurt. His knee will be reevaluated later this week. Allen. Maybe Lindberg later in the season.

for sure get some kids in.

Its not going to make people happy but right now for next yr I pencil in

Kreider, Stepan, Nash
Zuccarello, Brassard, Callahan( re-sign )
Hagelin, Miller, Dorsett

let all UFAs go. I would b surprised if Pouliott keeps going. Boyle should be dealt for a pick or maybe they can find a deal for a tough 4th line winger?
Moore as well for a late pick. Pyatt , Asham, Powe are useless. Richards has to be bought out.

Thing is will Lindberg be best as a 4th line C or does he need the minutes in CT? Fast , Hrvik, Kristo could all get a look.

yea they could make a balzy deal but I think if that happens its on D
 
He will not be the 2nd line guy this season. Let him gain some experience. Stick with him. 3rd line center. He is a center. It took Vigneault 3 months to figure it out.

Eh might not exactly be that it took him 3 months to figure it out but this team has a lot of centers and AV has obviously been juggling things around trying to find the best way to play them all. AV also likes to use a line for defensive duties and he needs a center to win draws and be responsible defensively, and I dont' think Miller was quite there. May still not be, but at this point he's probably not hurting the team anymore than it hurts itself, and I think AV has settled on using Boyle and Moore together as his defensive line and 4th line.

I like Miller's potential a lot. Again I think he could be the ideal Dubinsky replacement (and people sold Dubinsky short on a lot of stuff he brought to the table) but he still has a long ways to go. Getting NHL minutes with decent linemates should help that though I think, instead of hinder. I wouldn't trade him, teams need a hard working guy who has some skills and will play physical, and that's what Miller can be.
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ra...carello-skip-practice-staal-works-on-conditio

The Rangers scouting staff led by Gorton and Clark feel Miller's game is best suited at center.

The Rangers feel Miller can play in the bottom six and work his way into the top six. The problem was Vigneault wouldn't play Miller at center. Ryan Kesler started out as a bottom six player and worked his way into the top 6 when Vigneault became the Canucks coach. Miller is better than Boyle and Moore.

The Rangers felt Kreider couldn't play in the bottom six and work his way into the top six. He was sent to the AHL and it woke him up.

At the very least this season,the Rangers should try to establish some of their young guys in the NHL. Kreider looks to be on his way. His defensive game is better too. Miller. Too bad McIlrath got hurt. His knee will be reevaluated later this week. Allen. Maybe Lindberg later in the season.

I agree with this post, now's the time to start injecting some youth slowly-but-surely.
 
for sure get some kids in.

Its not going to make people happy but right now for next yr I pencil in

Kreider, Stepan, Nash
Zuccarello, Brassard, Callahan( re-sign )
Hagelin, Miller, Dorsett

let all UFAs go. I would b surprised if Pouliott keeps going. Boyle should be dealt for a pick or maybe they can find a deal for a tough 4th line winger?
Moore as well for a late pick. Pyatt , Asham, Powe are useless. Richards has to be bought out.

Thing is will Lindberg be best as a 4th line C or does he need the minutes in CT? Fast , Hrvik, Kristo could all get a look.

yea they could make a balzy deal but I think if that happens its on D

Dorsett is not a 3rd liner, and Zucc is best on RW. This team needs a legitimate top six LW.

The other dilemma becomes, if Zucc is on his way to becoming a viable top six RW, and Nash goes nowhere, are you going to overpay Callahan on a long term deal to be a 3rd liner, especially since he's likely reached his peak of development, and is more likely beginning his descent?
 
Dorsett is not a 3rd liner, and Zucc is best on RW. This team needs a legitimate top six LW.

The other dilemma becomes, if Zucc is on his way to becoming a viable top six RW, and Nash goes nowhere, are you going to overpay Callahan on a long term deal to be a 3rd liner, especially since he's likely reached his peak of development, and is more likely beginning his descent?

Sure. Agreed Dorsett is best on line 4. Was just stating who is on the team next yr.

Dz , Boyle for a top 6 lw is good w me . I think Cally does way to much for this team not to resign him even if it costs 6 mil
 
Sure. Agreed Dorsett is best on line 4. Was just stating who is on the team next yr.

Dz , Boyle for a top 6 lw is good w me . I think Cally does way to much for this team not to resign him even if it costs 6 mil

What top 6 LW are you getting for DZ and Boyle? 2 guys who get crucifiee on this board.
 
Miller shouldn't be at the 3C position though. He should be in Hartford developing, his defensive game is not up to par yet to take on that responsibility (though I have minimal complaints about his play lately). And if Miller/Lindberg do stick to the 3C position? Move Smith to wing. He's an asset either way.

2nd line center is tough......because to come anywhere near contending, we need to have a GOOD 2C to go with Stepan. I'm talking O'Reilly, Krejci, Dubinsky good. I'd rather just get a 1st line center and slot Stepan down, if the opportunity presents itself. A center I really like is Michael Dal Colle, size and speed he brings which we REALLY need, and he's having a tremendous year with Oshawa. Though I doubt we'd be able to draft him.

A few things.

1 - Del Colle is the guy I wanted the Rangers to target this draft. But he'll be nearly unobtainable if we're anywhere below 7th... and that may even be a stretch. He's big and the type of center the Rangers need for players like Zucc and Nash. A big, hard nosed center, is a guy that drives the defense back by going hard to the net. That will give Nash + Zucc a lot of space to carry the puck and be creative with it.

2 - I think Miller is good on the 3rd line. I've advocated for him to be up all season. I think that he's not ready to be up in the NHL is overblown. He's essentially a rookie and everyone needs to understand that there are bumps with rookies. There will be mistakes, but there will also be progression. I think the next step should be to let him do exactly this, play 10-13 minutes a game and let him learn at the biggest level. J.T also improves as he goes along - slow starts, dominant endings. I wouldn't be surprised if he actually looked like one of our better players come the end of the season (if he's not sent down upon Cally's return). Eventually, I think he game will translate to the 2nd line center role. I think he can develop into Kesler lite, but that's personal opinion.

3 - Again, I can't stress enough that Smith would likely be a 4th line player on this team. We have a few top 6 players and then a bunch of bottom 6 players. Let's assume that right now we have 4 top 6 players: Nash, Kreider, Stepan, and Zucc. Everyone else would technically be able to play bottom 6 roles effectively. Cally is a 3rd line winger at this stage in his career. You can slot him up to the 2nd line but Vigneault really likes raw offensive talent in his top 6. Hagelin is a 3rd line winger. Miller (for now) is a 3rd line center. I don't think Brassard will be a part of this team for much longer, and Richards will be bought out. Poo and Pyatt are gone at the end of the year, although I could see Sather/Gorton retaining Poo to be the 13th forward if he takes a team friendly contract. Anyone else coming in would be a 4th line player - Boyle, Dorsett, FA acquisition.

That leaves 2 spots that the Rangers need to hit out of the park to succeed. Maybe they have one of them in house in Kristo - everything I've read on him seems very promising. So that leaves a 2nd line center as our biggest and most pressing need - on offense.
 
He's not ready yet. Next year he should get a shot.

He has some pretty good raw offensive talent. Guys like that tend to be much closer to being ready than others.

The coaches are trying to teach him to play defensively. In that aspect he's not ready, and in that aspect he may never actually be dominant. But offensively... it's likely he has NHL-ready offensive skill.

Depending on where the team decides to go... he could conceivably be up by the deadline.
 
Kreider - Stepan - Nash
??? - ??? - Zuccarello
Hagelin - Miller - Callahan
Dorsett - Lindberg - Hrivik

Would be what I would be okay with if Cally is brought back. Richards bought out and Brassard/Miller are not good enough to be our 2C. Lindberg will be a good fourth line option next year and I think Hrivik would play well there too. Good on the boards. Strong. Good two-way sense. They could forecheck and grind/cycle well, that line.

McDonagh - ???
Staal - ???
Allen/Moore - McIlrath/Stralman

This team has more holes than we can realistically hope to fill. We need a true top-six center and winger and two top-four dmen who can at least play to the right. Those are big holes. Our only trade chips of any value are MDZ, Brassard, Boyle, one of Fast/Kristo, and picks. Otherwise we're just creating even more holes.
 
Kreider - Stepan - Nash
??? - ??? - Zuccarello
Hagelin - Miller - Callahan
Dorsett - Lindberg - Hrivik

Would be what I would be okay with if Cally is brought back. Richards bought out and Brassard/Miller are not good enough to be our 2C. Lindberg will be a good fourth line option next year and I think Hrivik would play well there too. Good on the boards. Strong. Good two-way sense. They could forecheck and grind/cycle well, that line.

McDonagh - ???
Staal - ???
Allen/Moore - McIlrath/Stralman

This team has more holes than we can realistically hope to fill. We need a true top-six center and winger and two top-four dmen who can at least play to the right. Those are big holes. Our only trade chips of any value are MDZ, Brassard, Boyle, one of Fast/Kristo, and picks. Otherwise we're just creating even more holes.

My post above yours has us having the same 2 holes. I think Kristo could be one of those top 6 wingers. We really need to focus on a 2c though.

Additionally, what's the FA market look like? We need defense too.

Allen looks like a promising 4-6. Too bad McI got hurt, we could have really evaluated where he was and what he could bring.

DZ is gone. Moore is another 5-6.

Do Girardi and Staal get traded or resigned?

Decisions decisions. DZ + Brassard will yield you a lot. So will Girardi and Staal (individually).
 
He has some pretty good raw offensive talent. Guys like that tend to be much closer to being ready than others.

The coaches are trying to teach him to play defensively. In that aspect he's not ready, and in that aspect he may never actually be dominant. But offensively... it's likely he has NHL-ready offensive skill.

Depending on where the team decides to go... he could conceivably be up by the deadline.

I don't agree with that take on him at all. He's not bad defensively. He's just not that good offensively. He has some ability. But will it translate easily to the next level? I'm not so sure. Offensively he still makes a lot of mistakes. Passes he can't make and that type of thing.
 
I don't agree with that take on him at all. He's not bad defensively. He's just not that good offensively. He has some ability. But will it translate easily to the next level? I'm not so sure. Offensively he still makes a lot of mistakes. Passes he can't make and that type of thing.

I was reading an article with Schoenfeld. He labeled bad passes as a defensive aspect part of the game. Kristo has natural scoring ability. He's not a Zucc or Brassard where his first thought is to pass. We need more guys that shoot. That Kristo can do.

But decisions have been a problem from what i've read. They're trying to get him to limit mistakes that lead to odd man rushes leading back. I don't know what to classify that as - Scho classified it as defensive aspects of the game.
 
I was reading an article with Schoenfeld. He labeled bad passes as a defensive aspect part of the game. Kristo has natural scoring ability. He's not a Zucc or Brassard where his first thought is to pass. We need more guys that shoot. That Kristo can do.

But decisions have been a problem from what i've read. They're trying to get him to limit mistakes that lead to odd man rushes leading back. I don't know what to classify that as - Scho classified it as defensive aspects of the game.

Eh however you want to label it. It's just semantics. There are aspects of his game apart from defensive positioning that need work. I'm not sure he is an elite finisher either. He's a good one. But that's at the ahl level.
 
My post above yours has us having the same 2 holes. I think Kristo could be one of those top 6 wingers. We really need to focus on a 2c though.

Additionally, what's the FA market look like? We need defense too.

Allen looks like a promising 4-6. Too bad McI got hurt, we could have really evaluated where he was and what he could bring.

DZ is gone. Moore is another 5-6.

Do Girardi and Staal get traded or resigned?

Decisions decisions. DZ + Brassard will yield you a lot. So will Girardi and Staal (individually).

Yep, I left G off my trade chips list but he is one. I don't think we move DZ, Girardi and Staal all in the same year so I kept Staal in my projection since he's under contract. Still, even with G in the trade chips, it's a lot of holes to fill. I wouldn't count on Kristo being able to contribute. We did that with Kreider a couple years ago and it was a mistake. Moving Staal could bring in a decent return as well, but it just opens another sizeable hole. I think next year will actually be worse for us. This is a good time to cut weight, stock pile prospects and high end picks and look to the future. This year and next could be bleak, but if handled right, could also set us up for a couple years from now.
 
What could Girardi yield us?

I think a top 3 prospect and a 1st.

He hasn't been extended yet. That's not a good sign in regards to his return to the team beyond this season.

Could Toronto want him? Ottawa? Plenty of teams need strong defense.

I'd start with a 2c (prospect or young player) and a 1st. Ott has Zib. Toronto has Kadri. Start there, add the first.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad