You guys are making me feel like I took my crazy pills this morning.
We're talking about Linus Omark. He turns 27 in February and has only managed to play in the NHL on a league worst team. There are countless players who've managed to put up half decent numbers on awful teams. Bobby Butler anyone? Mike Hoffman is 2+ years younger than him, bigger and currently putting up better numbers in the AHL than Omark.
Does anyone seriously think Omark would be able to earn big minutes under Maclean? He comes from the Oilers organization (can't make their team either), so its probably not a stretch to say he doesn't have much of a concept of team defense, which is something Mac demands.
Gryba on the other hand has earned his way into the NHL, and not onto an awful bottom feeder like the Oil. He came in, played 20+ minutes a night against top competition and helped us into a playoff spot. That's exactly the role he may be needed for again. NHL teams need to be 8-9D deep to stay competitive. The possibility of having 3-4 regulars out of the line up is a very real one (as we all should know by now). The role of the NHL defenseman these days is to get shot at by 100mph pucks, get cross checked from behind, boarded on dump and chases and suspended for hits that were celebrated a decade ago. THEY MISS GAMES. Check out Pittsburgh's D for tonight:
Matt Niskanen - Oli Maatta
Brian Dumolin - Robert Bortuzzo
Philip Samuelsson - Simon Despres
They're staying competitive because of their depth from within. The last thing you want to do is lose a bunch of defenders and have to bring someone in from outside the organization who's going to take a few weeks or months to adjust or dress 3-4 rookies. Gryba knows our system, coaches and players. He's ready to come fill in a top 4 spot when needed, he's done it before. Gryba brings a lot as a depth defender to this club.
Useful vs. Useless.