Rumor: Trade Rumors and Proposals: Will Chia get us an Xmas gift?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Narnia

Registered User
Mar 1, 2002
16,548
0
Surrey, BC
picasaweb.google.com
Hall Drai Purcell
Kreider McDavid Zibanejad
Pouliot Lander Lazar
Hendy Letestu Korpi

Klefbom Hamonic
Nurse Sekera
Davidson Vatanen

Nilsson/Talbot

RNH for Zibanejad and Lazar

Eberle plus 3rd for Kreider and Klein

Klein, Reinhart, Simpson, 2017 2nd for Bogosian

Bogosian, Chase for Hamonic

Yak, 2016 1st for Vatanen, ANA 2nd 2016

Schultz (50% retained) for a 4th

Replace Purcell with a UFA like Brouwer this summer.
The bolded is the biggest problem the Oilers have. Changing half the team every season is why the Oilers won't improve. Until the team has minimal changes every season, the Oilers will continue to flounder near the bottom of the standings.

Successful team don't change half the team every season.
 

McFlyingV

Registered User
Feb 22, 2013
23,693
15,531
Edmonton, Alberta
The bolded is the biggest problem the Oilers have. Changing half the team every season is why the Oilers won't improve. Until the team has minimal changes every season, the Oilers will continue to flounder near the bottom of the standings.

Successful team don't change half the team every season.

True, but successful teams don't have MacT's deadweight left to lug around and don't have abysmal drafting that leaves the team with hardly any internal options to replace deadweight players. There will have to be turnover on at least 4 or 5 players on this team, especially on the backend. Nikitin, Fayne, Schultz, and maybe Gryba need to be replaced with competent dmen. The forward group needs some tweaking as well.

I think in the offseason signing a few free agents and making a couple trades (one of which will probably need to include a "core" (by MacT's definition) player on the move).
 

Jet Walters

Registered User
May 15, 2013
7,438
3,181
The bolded is the biggest problem the Oilers have. Changing half the team every season is why the Oilers won't improve. Until the team has minimal changes every season, the Oilers will continue to flounder near the bottom of the standings.

Successful team don't change half the team every season.

Oilers have been changing the wrong half in the last number of year. Changing the top end of the roster is what needs to be done to have meaningful change.
 

McWeber

Mouthbreather
Jul 14, 2015
2,847
787
Lethbridge
Wideman for Schultz. Would you?

No question. If we put Wideman in Schultz's spot our powerplay would be so much better alone. It sucks to take the cap hit for next year but **** it we will plenty of space and hes a veteran RH shot who put up 50 points last year (not that we could expect that kind of production) would also mean Schultz on the Flames....that in itself is a win even if they waive him after 3 games.
 

Aerchon

Registered User
Jul 20, 2011
10,570
3,792
Lol some of these comments.

Schultz is better than Bergeron, slightly but way worse than Wideman.
 

FunkyChicken

Registered User
Jul 24, 2003
2,483
1,026
RNH for Jones
Yak + Schultz for Hamonic
Sign Byguglien

Byfuglien/Hamonic
Sekera/Jones
Klefbom/Nurse
Davidson

I don't see Schultz as having any value. Maybe at 50% salary retention. Still, not even close for Hamonic.

Jones is a bit of a gamble at this point but I can see the move from both side.

However, by signing Byfuglien, he alone gives you a decent top 4 (I'm assuming Nurse will be more ready for that role next year) with a Nurse-Byfuglien and Klefbolm-Sekara pairing. Davidson and Gryba would be tolerable with low minutes.
Nikitin walks and his salary goes to Klefbolm's raise.
Schultz walks and Ference and Fayne are bought out, goes to Byfuglien's salary.
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,480
14,489
Somewhere on Uranus
I don't see Schultz as having any value. Maybe at 50% salary retention. Still, not even close for Hamonic.

Jones is a bit of a gamble at this point but I can see the move from both side.

However, by signing Byfuglien, he alone gives you a decent top 4 (I'm assuming Nurse will be more ready for that role next year) with a Nurse-Byfuglien and Klefbolm-Sekara pairing. Davidson and Gryba would be tolerable with low minutes.
Nikitin walks and his salary goes to Klefbolm's raise.
Schultz walks and Ference and Fayne are bought out, goes to Byfuglien's salary.

You do realize that part of both Fayne's and Ference's buy will count agaist the cap and all indications are the oilers will carry over about 3mill in overage due to bonuses next season
 
Aug 10, 2015
422
133
You do realize that part of both Fayne's and Ference's buy will count agaist the cap and all indications are the oilers will carry over about 3mill in overage due to bonuses next season

Unless there are changes to the current lineup before the end of this season, I don't see the Oilers having any cap overage carried over to next season. The majority of their bonuses won't be met (even McDavid's who I thought was a foregone conclusion before the season started, are now in doubt....though Leon's who I thought wouldn't be paid now are much more likely to be).
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
18,597
15,104
Edmonton
I don't see Schultz as having any value. Maybe at 50% salary retention. Still, not even close for Hamonic.

Jones is a bit of a gamble at this point but I can see the move from both side.

However, by signing Byfuglien, he alone gives you a decent top 4 (I'm assuming Nurse will be more ready for that role next year) with a Nurse-Byfuglien and Klefbolm-Sekara pairing. Davidson and Gryba would be tolerable with low minutes.
Nikitin walks and his salary goes to Klefbolm's raise.
Schultz walks and Ference and Fayne are bought out, goes to Byfuglien's salary.

Our window to trade Schultz for maximum value was sometime between the day we signed him as a UFA to the end of his rookie season. Since then his play has driven his value down to something between David Clarkson to a bag of pucks.
 

Philly85*

I Ain't Even Mad
Mar 28, 2009
15,845
3
Yeah you're getting absolutely **** all for Schultz. What a disaster that turned out to be. I remember watching him the AHL and thinking he could be a Kris Letang type player. Unbelievable how badly things turned out.
 

PKSpecialist

Registered User
Feb 6, 2010
1,803
916
Wow, just looked at the Tampa Bay Lightning's contract situation. That team is in trouble.

The only thing they have going for them is a pretty good pipeline to replenish some of the players they are going to have to let go.

Stamkos and Coburn are the only UFA's of serious consequence after this season, but they have 10 players on their active roster up for RFA following the season including Kucherov, Killorn, Brown, Paquette and Nesterov. Some of these guys will be up for significant raises, and they have Bishop and Hedman going into UFA the following year, at the same time as Johnson, Palat, Drouin, Sustr and Vasilevsky go to RFA.

Somethings going to give in Tampa. How great would it be if they gave Stamkos a huge deal to stay the face of the franchise, and that shook Hedman free to the trade market.

On a side note, what happened to Matt Carle? 30 games, 0 points, averaging 17 minutes a night and making 5.5 million for two years past this one. I know he got overpaid on the contract at the time, but he was certainly a better player than this. Does he just need a change of scenery? He's only 31 years old.
 

TheRebuild

Bold as Boognish
Jun 12, 2014
2,165
405
Winter
I'll take Bergeron all day over Schultz. At least Bergeron was good on the PP.

Major difference between the two, MAB's slapshot was 100+ mph, while Schultz's is so slow, it doesn't even trigger the speed gun. Elderly people in the background, walking around the rink, can be seen overtaking his shot.
 

Up the Irons

Registered User
Mar 9, 2008
7,681
389
Canada
Oilers have been changing the wrong half in the last number of year. Changing the top end of the roster is what needs to be done to have meaningful change.

Thank you. They went all-in with a smurf top 6, and it has NEVER worked. A player like RNH would be effective on a big team, not unlike Kreidji on Boston. But the Oil absolutely NEED to get harder to play against.

RNH will be the first bold move.
 

Throttlehead

Registered User
Jan 22, 2014
2,749
967
Victoria B.C.
Wow, just looked at the Tampa Bay Lightning's contract situation. That team is in trouble.

The only thing they have going for them is a pretty good pipeline to replenish some of the players they are going to have to let go.

Stamkos and Coburn are the only UFA's of serious consequence after this season, but they have 10 players on their active roster up for RFA following the season including Kucherov, Killorn, Brown, Paquette and Nesterov. Some of these guys will be up for significant raises, and they have Bishop and Hedman going into UFA the following year, at the same time as Johnson, Palat, Drouin, Sustr and Vasilevsky go to RFA.

Somethings going to give in Tampa. How great would it be if they gave Stamkos a huge deal to stay the face of the franchise, and that shook Hedman free to the trade market.

On a side note, what happened to Matt Carle? 30 games, 0 points, averaging 17 minutes a night and making 5.5 million for two years past this one. I know he got overpaid on the contract at the time, but he was certainly a better player than this. Does he just need a change of scenery? He's only 31 years old.

I'm pretty sure they would trade Stamkos before letting Hedman go, quite honestly Hedman is more important to the team.
 

McCombo

Registered User
Nov 16, 2013
1,100
532
I'm pretty sure they would trade Stamkos before letting Hedman go, quite honestly Hedman is more important to the team.
Stamkos has full NMC/NTC, if he doesnt want to get traded they are forced to let him walk for free. Or sign him into huge deal which will cripple to team...
 

Pointteen

Registered User
Jun 9, 2008
8,021
1,667
New Brunswick
Stamkos has full NMC/NTC, if he doesnt want to get traded they are forced to let him walk for free. Or sign him into huge deal which will cripple to team...

Stamkos' contract was the least compromised one to exist for a star player.
He took as much money as possible and term to take him to free agency and a NMC. He gets precisely what he wants. He'll do the same thing again.
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,480
14,489
Somewhere on Uranus
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad