The only way to contend is to have a better roster than at least 25 other teams.
How do you do that when all teams operate under the same cap?
1. For a short stint, not that long anymore at all, you have an ability to draft really good young players and contend while they are cheap. That can be one advantage and one way.
2. The other more obvious way is to sign players to long term deals, that by nature are market value when signed, but become cheap deals down the road.
For a long time now, we have refused to lock up any of our players long term. That has -- without any single doubt -- been a horrible misstake by Slats. His fixation with bridge contracts and what not is probably by far the biggest misstake he has done while being a GM in this league. All over the league, guys like Staal, Girardi, McD and co are locked up on 6-7 year deals worth around 4-5m per. With the cap set to explode, those teams with core players on cheap contracts will have a great advantage.
We gotta start sometime. Otherwise we just push the problem ahead of us. Its 6m per this time, next time it will be 7m per and then 8m per. It will never stop.
If you want to build for the future, we gotta start locking up our players long-term. I know many only care about the present and want to dump these guys right now to get more cap friendly deals, but that is only pushing the problem infront of us. Those cap-friendly options will get paid in a hurry too. Sometime you gotta take a step back to become better, and the only way to do that is to bite the bullet now and lock-up players now before the market-value goes up.
I mean, if we only push the problem infront of us and jump from "the most cap friendly deal at the moment" to the other, how will we ever be able to fit in good enough players to compete? I mean, just look at the current situation. We aren't good enough and we don't have enough room.
How do you do that when all teams operate under the same cap?
1. For a short stint, not that long anymore at all, you have an ability to draft really good young players and contend while they are cheap. That can be one advantage and one way.
2. The other more obvious way is to sign players to long term deals, that by nature are market value when signed, but become cheap deals down the road.
For a long time now, we have refused to lock up any of our players long term. That has -- without any single doubt -- been a horrible misstake by Slats. His fixation with bridge contracts and what not is probably by far the biggest misstake he has done while being a GM in this league. All over the league, guys like Staal, Girardi, McD and co are locked up on 6-7 year deals worth around 4-5m per. With the cap set to explode, those teams with core players on cheap contracts will have a great advantage.
We gotta start sometime. Otherwise we just push the problem ahead of us. Its 6m per this time, next time it will be 7m per and then 8m per. It will never stop.
If you want to build for the future, we gotta start locking up our players long-term. I know many only care about the present and want to dump these guys right now to get more cap friendly deals, but that is only pushing the problem infront of us. Those cap-friendly options will get paid in a hurry too. Sometime you gotta take a step back to become better, and the only way to do that is to bite the bullet now and lock-up players now before the market-value goes up.
I mean, if we only push the problem infront of us and jump from "the most cap friendly deal at the moment" to the other, how will we ever be able to fit in good enough players to compete? I mean, just look at the current situation. We aren't good enough and we don't have enough room.