Wow. I'm going to try and answer this post, though it doesn't deserve one.
First of all, that "39 year old midget" would instantly become the most highly skilled forward we have had since Jagr. He also has 60 points in 60 games this season, but you're right. Let's just focus on his size, ignoring the fact that not only is the Rangers best forward this season 5'7" on stilts, and 170 lbs soaking wet and holding a pitbull.
You also assume that we would need to "clean out our prospect pool" for St. Louis. Yep. We'd have to trade the entire Hartford Wolf Pack. If the trade for Callahan and St. Louis does go through, it will be a prospect included and a draft pick that no one will bat an eye at. You have to give to get.
I don't care what Stafford's surrounding cast is like. He's not getting it done, and hasn't been getting it done for a few seasons now. Do you know who Stafford sees regular ice time with? The Moulsons, Hodgsons, Vaneks (when he was there), and Ennis' of Buffalo. He's playing with their top players, and he's not producing like they are. Of his 10 goals this season, 6 of them have come in the last 10 games. Is he turning it on? Maybe. Is this just a random hot streak considering history? More likely.
Not to mention:
Is a horrible deal for the Rangers. If Sather did this trade, I'd be done. It would instantly become the worst deal in Rangers history.
Stepan ran Downie from behind. Did the Flyers on the ice do anything? Are the Flyers a soft team?
I have yet to read a realistic logical reason why Tampa Bay would hand us St. Louis for Callahan (unsigned with dilusions of self worth) and a middling prospect and pick for this greatest player you describe? Especially when they are in the middle of contending for their Division's title?
Because it would please you as a Rangers fan isn't a valid answer.
Dylan McIlrath is a good prospect, and hes tough as nails, he's also not as intelligent a player as say, Skjei, who IMO has a real future as a professional, its uncertain what sort of player McIlrath can be in the NHL. He can fight, can he handle the NHL in his own end?
Yzerman repeatdely said he will not trade St. Louis for Callahan. But you know better? It doesn't matter if he asked for a trade, it doesn't matter that he specifically asked to go to the Rangers. Yzerman doesn't HAVE TO accomodate him. He has one more year left on his contract. Is he going to protest and refuse to play? Yzerman can hold onto him until the contract expires if he felt inclined to.
The Rangers want St. Louis, they can wait until summer 2015 and sign him.
Furthermore, why wouldn't Yzerman demand a huge return? Because you want St. Louis for less, isn't a valid response.
There is NO real reason for Yzerman to trade St. louis, at all. Not for a rental. Not for an underwhelming return. Not while they're a real contender in the East, not while he's under contract for another year. NO valid real reason.
Take the Ranger goggles off and see things from the other team's point-of-view.
St. Louis, while having the right mix of size, grit, center depth, and offensive defenseman, that all REAL contenders have, is a pipe dream.
This team lacks core fundamental pieces. A- No legit #1 center. B- No legit offensive defenesman. C- No size and no grit to withstand a long playoff run.
But, i'm the dilusional one suggesting to add Stafford (don't give a **** if we don't it was a suggestion) and McGinn types to add size on the wings, scoring depth, and some guts.
Dilusions of grandeur that St. Louis puts us over the top of the likes of Boston, Pittsburgh(make all the jokes about their D and Fleury you want, he won a Cup and got to the finals twice), Anaheim, Chicago, STL, LA, SJ, even Tampa.