Rumor: Trade Rumor/Speculation Thread XXVII: Viva la St.Louis! [Mod Warning post #1]

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Brown also captained a much better team, and has always been on a team with far more offensive talent than Callahan.

Fair point, but I still think Callahan's play in the playoffs have been underwhelming overall compared to Brown, who always impresses me when the game is tight. Well, aside from the Olympics when he kneed that player like an idiot.

And I don't think Callahan's play will continue to decline. In fact, I don't think it has declined all that much to begin with. I've stated the NUMEROUS mitigating factors that have to be taken into account when considering Callahan's production this season time and again. Production, I'll add yet again, that is 5 points behind Rick Nash's in an equal number of games played.

Eh. His dip in numbers can be explained, but I still think his overall game has declined. He can still be disruptive on the forecheck, but not to the extent that he has been in the past.

Nash also has 19 goals to Callahan's 11. Both have missed time with injuries, although Nash's was more serious. That's a fair point to bring up, but Nash is a 35-40 goal first liner, and is the better ES player production-wise. I do think Callahan's production would be up with more PP time, but we've had a bunch of other players step up and challenge his spot when he went down.

He has missed significant time in only 2 seasons. Playing 75 games in a season does not equate to missing significant time.

Missing significant time isn't the only barometer for gauging injuries. Playing with the torn labrum last year is worthy of bringing up, mainly because I think that decision will haunt him for years to come. And he played 75+ games in 10-11, only to break his ankle blocking a Chara slapshot right before the playoffs started.

It really all adds up, IMO. These injuries make his body more fragile in the long run, I'd say.

He doesn't look like the same player this year. I don't argue that. I argue that this is enough cause to proclaim that he is a declining player, because it clearly isn't. We've heard so much lately about the wonderful career of Teemu Selanne and how it is sadly coming to an end. I remember 10 years go, people thought Selanne was done. He was 33 years old, and he scored 16 goals and 16 assists in 78 games in 03-04. No, Callahan is not Teemu Selanne, but like Selanne, he is just one of so many other players that have had down seasons. A down season scoring-wise does not always equal decline.

As I said prior, I think there were signs of decline in Callahan's game last season, not just this season. Seriously, playing with that injury could potentially alter the rest of his career for the worst.

Your point regarding Selanne is fair, but, as you said yourself, Callahan isn't Selanne. Callahan is more comparable to a Graves, Drury, Peca type player, players who were all-out heart and soul players in their prime, a prime that was short lived.

Again, NUMEROUS factors that play into his performance this season. So numerous that it simply isn't reasonable to claim that he's a declining player. Way too many variables at play.

Well, I'd say that:

- Injuries
- Lack of PP time
- Zuccarello

Are the biggest reasons why his numbers have dropped off this year. Zuccarello having the year he is having is what has put him on the block as well, IMO (along with his upcoming UFA status).

Zuccarello will be here for the long haul, IMO. He's a special little player, and there is more upside there.

I love you too, dude, but respectfully, I think the judgment that has been clouded is yours. You've succumbed to the same thing everyone around here always succumbs to: this impatient, irrational flock mentality. I've been in the minority before. I was in the minority when the Rangers hired Glen Sather, traded for Eric Lindros, signed the likes of Holik and Gomez and Redden, drafted McIlrath instead of Tarasenko, among many others. I don't mind being in the minority. Most of the time, I come out smelling like roses.

I've been an advocate of looking to move Callahan since the summer, although I wasn't as vocal since it would have been considered extremely controversial at the time.

With this move, I am more thinking about the future than anything, because IMO, he will either plateau or decline from this point on. Quite frankly, I'd rather lose him for nothing as a free agent than sign him to the contract his is asking for. I could swallow 6x6, but I would NOT be happy with it, although, if he proved me wrong, I would happily eat crow.

I think where we most disagree is what we each think Callahan will be in the upcoming seasons. Personally, I think his numbers will continue to drop or at worst plateau, while becoming less effective physically. Do you really blame me for thinking that, with the way he has played this year, and the decline of similar players in the past?


That's where we disagree. I think he has represented everything this franchise hasn't been for longer than you've been a fan of it. No, he's not Hank. But he's far and away the closest to him.

I'm not saying his contract demands are ideal. I'm not saying a 6 year contract would be ideal. He'll be overpaid, and he probably won't be that great by the end of the contract. I'm saying, that in the grand scheme of things, it really isn't going to make much of a difference, except to cut a hole in the franchise's history where one shouldn't be. A franchise with a history that is lacking in many regards.

Winning a championship is a lot easier when you have a player that plays the way Callahan does, and replacing that sort of player is SO MUCH harder than people around here seem to believe.

I mean, I guess this is a fair line of thinking, as I wasn't around for the dark days, but I just dislike the idea of paying for the past in a sport like hockey. If Callahan were a durable player, I'd give him the 6x6 easily. And Sather is giving it to him now! That contract is more than fair. There is really no one to blame here but Callahan for being unreasonable; and Sather isn't the only one who thinks that, it seems. Doesn't seem like many teams are interested in acquiring Callahan because they don't want to give in to his contract demands, and they don't want to just have him a rental.

We will see what happens. My stance is clear. If Callahan continues to be what he was from 08-09 to 11-12 post new contract, I will gladly eat some crow, regardless of the team he is playing on.
 
Let me ask you guy a question. Off season comes and the only option is to sign stastny or vanek would you sign one or go forward to the season minus cally and richie assuming they are both gone ? And lets say theres no trade options on the market
 
Why should Callahan see that? Sather offered him 2 million dollars and a few more years more than he's worth.

In an ideal world, as a member of this team, Cally should be able to see how much Girardi does for this team and realize that he shouldn't get 1-1.5m more per year. Realistically, I know that's not how these things work and I don't expect Callahan to sign for less.
 
In an ideal world, as a member of this team, Cally should be able to see how much Girardi does for this team and realize that he shouldn't get 1-1.5m more per year. Realistically, I know that's not how these things work and I don't expect Callahan to sign for less.

I bet Callahan is salivating over the fact that Sather was dumb enough to give him that offer and I bet he thinks he can get even more.
 
Let me ask you guy a question. Off season comes and the only option is to sign stastny or vanek would you sign one or go forward to the season minus cally and richie assuming they are both gone ? And lets say theres no trade options on the market

I would absolutely sign Vanek if he's interested. I still think that a Richards buyout isn't as forgone a conclusion as most may think. Vanek brings us that dangerous right handed shot that's been missing since Shanahan retired.
 
Dorsett has disappointed me greatly. Was SO happy when we acquired him last year, I though he could become another Prust for us. He is just not as versatile, though. Prust wasn't much bigger than Dorsett, but he was stronger and much tougher to knock off the puck.

Plus one. Not that he is completely useless, but I had hoped for more of a Chris Neil type of precense...
 
I would absolutely sign Vanek if he's interested. I still think that a Richards buyout isn't as forgone a conclusion as most may think. Vanek brings us that dangerous right handed shot that's been missing since Shanahan retired.

Agree. I wouldn't be surprised if Richards is still here next season. Replacing him through UFA or trading will be expensive. I get the "if he retires early" issue. But I think we will, and should, keep him non the less. Trade Callahan for picks/prospects. Use the cap space in the off season to sign Vanek if possible.
 
Can anyone name a physical, top-six forward 6' or under who maintained his level of play to a reasonable standard from ages 30-35?

I can certainly name a few who haven't:

Bfpnj6aCIAAulOl.png

Easily 31, where did you get those names from? Isn't Cally 6'1? He is no midget.

Jamie Langenbrunner turned 30 in 2005. Then posted 4 of his 5 best years in following 5 years.

http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=8742

Chris Kunitz turned 30 in 2009. He has since then had his best years, yes he is playing with Crosby but he is as good now as he was for Anaheim.

http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=8523

Pascal Dupuis is another player in that catheogry.

Jarome Iginla had maybe his best years between 30-35.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/player.htm?id=8462042

Shane Doan had his best years between 30-35.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/player.htm?id=8462038

Jason Arnott had by far his best years between 30-35.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/player.htm?id=8459429

Knuble had his best years post 30. Lankow (5'10) had his best years post 30. Roloston had his best years post 30.
 
How does Vanish and Richards on the team work? $26.5M invested in Hank,Nash,McD and G. Vanek will get at least $7M and Richards is at $6,666,667. $40M invested in 6 players. Add the other current commitments for next season. $14.4M in 6 players. Stepan,Hagelin,Dorsett,Staal,Klein and Talbot. That's $54M in 12 players. $70M cap. How does that work? Zuccarello,Brassard and Kreider are arbitration eligible. They will cost more than $10M to re-sign them. 15 players. 9 forwards,4 D and 2 goalies. Fill out the roster. Leave room to run the team.

I am very grateful to have seen the Rangers win the Cup in person because we will never see this organization win a championship. Now with the way Dolan and Sather run this team. :shakehead
 
A guy like Vanek would come at the expense of Brassard. Brassard will end up with about 50 points this season, well over what I thought he would get. Those are good 2nd line numbers. It all depends on if the front office thinks he can sustain that pace for the next couple seasons. He's a group III in 2015. The Rangers may look to trade him in a package for something or they may walk from arbitration this summer if he's awarded more than the brass feels he's worth.

The Rangers have good center depth right now, you don't toy with that. However, this situation blocks a guy like Miller from breaking out into a 3rd line role. Moore or Boyle should both be brought back.

Girardi is the first move of this deadline and offseason. It's an important next 4-6 months. The Rangers may feel they need Richards' leadership. Brassard is setting himself up to get a raise. He may become too rich for the Rangers to hold onto. I'd trade him in the offseason if they get a good offer.
 
Ken Campbell said Vancouver turned down the Pens offer for Kesler.

Rangers have a few assets but they're blocked. Klein blocks McIlrath. Kristo? Fasth? Lindberg? When do these guys play? They're trade bait at this point.

Neil Smith knew how to build a good team but he didn't know how to build a Cup winner. Keenan went to the Cup three times and lost all three. Vigneault was a game away from the Cup when Luongo melted down. Sather thinks it's 1987. Does Sather listen to Vigneault ever?

This is Vigneault's team. Not Sathers. Vigneault knows what he needs to beat Boston or Chicago.

If Vigneault says they are better off keeping Callahan and Girardi, then it's Sather's job to work and be flexible.

AV said Del Zotto sucked. Good call. AV gave Kreider big minutes. Great call. AV put Mac on the PP. Another great call. AV formed the lines. All good calls. AV played Talbot when Lundqvist stunk. Good call.

Vanek? Statsny? That's Sather talking. But look at it from his standpoint. Who replaces Callahan and Richards next season?
 
Penguins have offered Sutter, a 1st, a 3rd and either Despres/Dumoulin for Kesler, from @RobRossi_Trib: http://t.co/VbJVCTxAQg

If Vancouver turned that down, it could take Brassard, McIlrath and a 1st and 2nd to get it done.

Torts would want Stepan. If they re-sign Callahan and trade for Kesler they will likely go back to back years without a 1st rounder.
 
Good, that's a lowball deal from Shero. I would think they would put him on Crosby's wing rather than make him 3rd line center. They've been quiet otherwise, they may be the dark horse to rent Vanek. He would make Pittsburgh's top 6 even scarier.

Back to the Rangers, you have potential Callahan replacements in Fast and Kristo, the former more likely than the latter if he could stay healthy. Richards would be a bit more difficult to replace from within. Even though Brassard is playing well, I'm still not sold on him taking on that 2nd line center position and sustaining his production from this year.
 
Richards is on pace for a 58 point season. A cap hit of nearly $7M should give the Rangers more than 58 points. The Rangers need more production for that kind of money. If you look at the numbers,Richards is on pace for worse year than last season. He was on pace for 60 points in the lockout. 34 points in 46 games. 15 goals and 28 assists in 61 games this season. His point totals are dropping every year. 91 to 77 to 66 to 60 to 58. $57M in the first 6 years of the contract. $9.5M AAV. Not even close.

40. 2020.

There are no good options with the Rangers. Its the best bad option. 1994 Forever.
 
The Pens have lost four of six and have a murder schedule to close the season. The deadline ends before a West Coast swing. With Letang out, they need a puck mover. Dan Boyle has asked for an extension in San Jose but will likely go to UFA.

The Pens play in San Jose the day after the deadline. If they don't pony up for Kesler, it wouldn't shock me they get Boyle (who has a limited NTC)
 
Richards is on pace for a 58 point season. A cap hit of nearly $7M should give the Rangers more than 58 points. The Rangers need more production for that kind of money. If you look at the numbers,Richards is on pace for worse year than last season. He was on pace for 60 points in the lockout. 34 points in 46 games. 15 goals and 28 assists in 61 games this season. His point totals are dropping every year. 91 to 77 to 66 to 60 to 58. $57M in the first 6 years of the contract. $9.5M AAV. Not even close.

40. 2020.

There are no good options with the Rangers. Its the best bad option. 1994 Forever.

6.6 million for leading the team in scoring. He's doing his job. 1.6 million more than Ryan Clowe.

Rangers have three centers on pace for 50+ points. Three centers combined for an under 15 million cap hit.

Not ideal but not catastrophic. They won't win a Cup without a dominant center.

He's getting bought out. He wasn't that big of a disappointment.
 
So if he gets dealt is it back to Cally for Stewart and a pick but now buffalo? Lol

What if his agent was allowed to them and worked an agreement out?

This likely gets done Monday or rues since nyr plays Wednesday
 
When they asked Bartlet about AVs new found optimism regarding Cally resigning, he said it was 'news to him".

If you've been dangling Callahan for months, isnt that just what you want teams to think in the stretch of the deadline race, that he's so vital you're upping your offer and want to keep him?

Not buying it; and definitely dont agree with paying a 34 yr old Callahan $6.5m. Not when - at worst - you can probably still get a Stewart (and maybe Buffalo's No. 1, which'd be a high pick, though I think they have several) or MSL or who knows what else is out there. Boyle shifted back to the middle yesterday, eh? Hmmm... Sather reportedly has his nose in every deal LOL;
So dont be surprised if you're surprised.
 
6.4 million in 2020 could be the league average.

The issue isn't what Callahan does on the ice. It's what that 6 million does to everybody else who's due a contract.

If Nash, Richards and Callahan - - 20 million in cap hit -- vanished and we're replaced by MZA, Miller and Fasth, how much of a difference will it make in the standings?

10 points? 5 points?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad