JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK
Twenty f*ckin years
- Oct 8, 2010
- 80,069
- 17,709
Brown also captained a much better team, and has always been on a team with far more offensive talent than Callahan.
Fair point, but I still think Callahan's play in the playoffs have been underwhelming overall compared to Brown, who always impresses me when the game is tight. Well, aside from the Olympics when he kneed that player like an idiot.
And I don't think Callahan's play will continue to decline. In fact, I don't think it has declined all that much to begin with. I've stated the NUMEROUS mitigating factors that have to be taken into account when considering Callahan's production this season time and again. Production, I'll add yet again, that is 5 points behind Rick Nash's in an equal number of games played.
Eh. His dip in numbers can be explained, but I still think his overall game has declined. He can still be disruptive on the forecheck, but not to the extent that he has been in the past.
Nash also has 19 goals to Callahan's 11. Both have missed time with injuries, although Nash's was more serious. That's a fair point to bring up, but Nash is a 35-40 goal first liner, and is the better ES player production-wise. I do think Callahan's production would be up with more PP time, but we've had a bunch of other players step up and challenge his spot when he went down.
He has missed significant time in only 2 seasons. Playing 75 games in a season does not equate to missing significant time.
Missing significant time isn't the only barometer for gauging injuries. Playing with the torn labrum last year is worthy of bringing up, mainly because I think that decision will haunt him for years to come. And he played 75+ games in 10-11, only to break his ankle blocking a Chara slapshot right before the playoffs started.
It really all adds up, IMO. These injuries make his body more fragile in the long run, I'd say.
He doesn't look like the same player this year. I don't argue that. I argue that this is enough cause to proclaim that he is a declining player, because it clearly isn't. We've heard so much lately about the wonderful career of Teemu Selanne and how it is sadly coming to an end. I remember 10 years go, people thought Selanne was done. He was 33 years old, and he scored 16 goals and 16 assists in 78 games in 03-04. No, Callahan is not Teemu Selanne, but like Selanne, he is just one of so many other players that have had down seasons. A down season scoring-wise does not always equal decline.
As I said prior, I think there were signs of decline in Callahan's game last season, not just this season. Seriously, playing with that injury could potentially alter the rest of his career for the worst.
Your point regarding Selanne is fair, but, as you said yourself, Callahan isn't Selanne. Callahan is more comparable to a Graves, Drury, Peca type player, players who were all-out heart and soul players in their prime, a prime that was short lived.
Again, NUMEROUS factors that play into his performance this season. So numerous that it simply isn't reasonable to claim that he's a declining player. Way too many variables at play.
Well, I'd say that:
- Injuries
- Lack of PP time
- Zuccarello
Are the biggest reasons why his numbers have dropped off this year. Zuccarello having the year he is having is what has put him on the block as well, IMO (along with his upcoming UFA status).
Zuccarello will be here for the long haul, IMO. He's a special little player, and there is more upside there.
I love you too, dude, but respectfully, I think the judgment that has been clouded is yours. You've succumbed to the same thing everyone around here always succumbs to: this impatient, irrational flock mentality. I've been in the minority before. I was in the minority when the Rangers hired Glen Sather, traded for Eric Lindros, signed the likes of Holik and Gomez and Redden, drafted McIlrath instead of Tarasenko, among many others. I don't mind being in the minority. Most of the time, I come out smelling like roses.
I've been an advocate of looking to move Callahan since the summer, although I wasn't as vocal since it would have been considered extremely controversial at the time.
With this move, I am more thinking about the future than anything, because IMO, he will either plateau or decline from this point on. Quite frankly, I'd rather lose him for nothing as a free agent than sign him to the contract his is asking for. I could swallow 6x6, but I would NOT be happy with it, although, if he proved me wrong, I would happily eat crow.
I think where we most disagree is what we each think Callahan will be in the upcoming seasons. Personally, I think his numbers will continue to drop or at worst plateau, while becoming less effective physically. Do you really blame me for thinking that, with the way he has played this year, and the decline of similar players in the past?
That's where we disagree. I think he has represented everything this franchise hasn't been for longer than you've been a fan of it. No, he's not Hank. But he's far and away the closest to him.
I'm not saying his contract demands are ideal. I'm not saying a 6 year contract would be ideal. He'll be overpaid, and he probably won't be that great by the end of the contract. I'm saying, that in the grand scheme of things, it really isn't going to make much of a difference, except to cut a hole in the franchise's history where one shouldn't be. A franchise with a history that is lacking in many regards.
Winning a championship is a lot easier when you have a player that plays the way Callahan does, and replacing that sort of player is SO MUCH harder than people around here seem to believe.
I mean, I guess this is a fair line of thinking, as I wasn't around for the dark days, but I just dislike the idea of paying for the past in a sport like hockey. If Callahan were a durable player, I'd give him the 6x6 easily. And Sather is giving it to him now! That contract is more than fair. There is really no one to blame here but Callahan for being unreasonable; and Sather isn't the only one who thinks that, it seems. Doesn't seem like many teams are interested in acquiring Callahan because they don't want to give in to his contract demands, and they don't want to just have him a rental.
We will see what happens. My stance is clear. If Callahan continues to be what he was from 08-09 to 11-12 post new contract, I will gladly eat some crow, regardless of the team he is playing on.