Toggle sidebar

Rumor: Trade Rumor/Speculation Thread XXVI: G Staying Put.

  • Thread starter Thread starter *Bob Richards*
  • Start date Start date
  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
JPP4121 said:
Im not a big believer in Nash come crunch time. If I could get equal value for him, I would trade him. Im not a rush to trade him, but if I can get equal value and it fills a need on the team, I would move him.
Click to expand...

agree with this. personally I wish we had never gotten rid of gaborik. I would trade Nash for Gabs in a heartbeat
 
NYR Viper said:
Everyone missed the point. Do you see how he maximized his assets and filled their holes immediately?
Click to expand...

Maximized assets by trading assets most teams don't trade, yeah sure.

Most teams don't trade Thomas Vanek and Ryan Miller. Those players will get back those returns.

A Rangers equivalent would probably be Brassard for Derek Roy + 2nd. No point.
 
And, let's be honest, the Vanek acquisition by the Islanders was a moronic trade for the Isles who thought Vanek would put them over the top and instead it screwed up chemistry, got them a player they can't sign, and lost important draft picks.

The real story is how bad the Islanders made out in that deal.
 
haohmaru said:
And, let's be honest, the Vanek acquisition by the Islanders was a moronic trade for the Isles who thought Vanek would put them over the top and instead it screwed up chemistry, got them a player they can't sign, and lost important draft picks.

The real story is how bad the Islanders made out in that deal.
Click to expand...

That's what I keep trying to explain, but nobody seems to read my posts :(
 
Punxrocknyc19 said:
how legit is this???



MARTIN ST. LOUIS MAY BE A RANGER THIS WEEKEND

NY would send Ryan Callahan, a depth forward or prospect and a 3rd round pick to Tampa Bay for Martin St. Louis. A conditional pick could come back to the Rangers if the Lightning re-sign Callahan or make it to the Eastern Conference Finals.

http://fulltiltnyr.com/martin-st-louis-may-ranger-weekend/
Click to expand...

014944bf103c6ef4095941dcbc331c08976e64d9372adb492e6eca04d10253b1.jpg
 
fulltilt pulling the ***************.. wait and wait and try to guess from highly reported rumors that a deal is about to go down.

trying to get lucky and look like they broke it.. all that is.
 
NYR Viper said:
Why do you have to just do one or the other?
Click to expand...

I understand what you're getting at. You don't have to be one or the other. But if we remove Callahan from the lineup, and don't upgrade that position, what are we doing? Weakening ourselves for a playoff run?

That's not going for it.
 
Lundsanity30 said:
so we sign our 2nd best dman to keep us a contender, and you don't want MSL because of it?.. I"m confused.
Click to expand...

if MSL costs a future "maybe", a "nobody" prospect like Ryan Bourque, and Ryan Callahan (who doesn't want to be here, and is not resigning for anything reasonable), you do that trade all day
 
NYR Viper said:
Do you really think downgrading from Ott to Stewart is a big downgrade? Worth 2 picks + prospect to downgrade from Miller to Halak?
Click to expand...

No, but St. Louis must have.. In both cases..... Thus having to include picks to entice the Sabers into the "downgrade" at their respective positions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom