NYR Sting
Heart and Soul
It's not a numbers-to-numbers comparison though. I'm not comparing the monetary terms of each deal. Though if you really want to go that route, Drury deserved a larger percentage of the cap than Callahan ever did because Drury was a 65+ point scorer in three of his seasons in the NHL. He was also a 30+ goal scorer on two separate occasions. Callahan has NEVER done either.
But again, it's not a numbers-to-numbers comparison. It's about the principle of it. Chris Drury got a contract he didn't deserve because of "intangibles". The money he got was way more than he deserved compared to similar point scorers in the league. He got it because of intangibles. It ended up being a massive waste of money. There were also major concerns about his health given the way he played the game. He had injury concerns. Yet he got more years than most other teams would have been willing to give. He got more money than he deserved and he got more years than he deserved. Why? Supposed intangibles. It blew up in our faces.
No, "intangibles" are not why Chris Drury was overpaid. Intangibles are the word posters around here use when goals and assists are about as deep of an analysis as they can conduct about a player. Chris Drury was overpaid because Glen Sather made the same mistake you're making right now: thinking that Chris Drury was a major point producer on his own, not the garbage man on a high-octane power play.
You know where Chris Drury spent the bulk of his even strength time while playing for the Buffalo Sabres? On the 2nd or 3rd line. You know who was on that Sabres power play surrounding Drury, who was planted in front of the net? An in-his-prime Daniel Briere, Thomas Vanek, Derek Roy in his prime, Jason Pominville, and even though he's a moron, a properly-utilized blast from the point from Ales Kotalik.
If Ryan Callahan EVER had the opportunity to be the garbage man on a PP with that kind of talent, he would be putting up 60 points, too.
He's already missing double digit games per season. How many will he be missing 4+ years from now?
No, he isn't. He's missed double digit games twice, once this season, and once 4 years ago.
Not to mention, his playoff performances in the past have been marred by nagging injuries he puts his body thru every year. This actually makes his situation *worse* than the Drury one. At least Drury had a few solid playoff performances to push his "intangible" narrative. Lastly, I think his type of game is getting less and less important in today's NHL. The Blackhawks have already proven that hits are perhaps the most overrated stats in the league.
Luckily, hits are a very small part of Callahan's value. And "intangibles" are only a narrative around here thanks to posters like yourself who continue to push it in lieu of discussing what Callahan actually does (or what Drury did, for that matter, when similar discussions were being held regarding him), which is play excellent defensive hockey, most of which has very little to do with hitting or even blocking shots. Those are two things he does very well, but neither represents the best of his defensive repertoire.