Pretty darn good since 2005? You mean signing Gomez, Drury, Redden, Kotalik, Brashear, Rupp, Boogaard, should I keep going? How about the 3 coaching changes? The guy doesn't have a clue, every move is made in a vacuum. His "vision" is laughable. ... This is not a contending team and Sather has not been on a roll. There are people on these boards who could have done a better job than him since he began. ... He's atrocious and you said it yourself, he's there for LIFE. Which is completely on the owner.
Good rant. I always think of when they drafted Staal as the real beginning of this 2nd phase. I could be off, maybe its 2006 rather than 05. Hank & Cally were earlier if not mistaken, but for some reason i think of Staal.
There's no getting around the all-time disaster that Sather was.
It was, IMO, arguably the worst run by any executive not just in hockey, but in any sport, maybe of all-time. That's how ugly, confused, rudderless, whatever word you want to insert, insert it.
He sucked as bad as you could suck.
No argument from me there, ever.
But since then? I gotta be fair. He resisted lots of opportunities for quick fixes by holding onto the young guys we now have, weeding out the rest and trying to keep the best. Gord Clark said 3 years ago this next wave of guys, Step, Kreider, Hagelin, McIlrath, even McD who they snagged were the real rebuilding program come to life, the best of the bunch. They look as good as any young group of players in the game to me, though we never get credit for it anymore.
How good does Zuc look? Even his coach didnt want him, so Sather ditched the coach and brought Zuc back. It's complicated.
But Sather's managed some minimal success in the meantime, but I think everything (post 2006 or so) has been geared towards right now. Gotta see what happens with this group next 2-3 years.