Of course it effects me, who else does it effect. Im just saying it.
Callahan surely has to come down from 7million 7 years if that is in fact with his asking for. but I've said it befre I give them both 6y 36 m deals.
Their loyalty seems to be each other, and isn't that what you want? Do you want the players on the team to be loyal to each other or to you the fan? I want the team I watch to be a team. And you don't get a closer knit group then when guys are willing to go to bat for them.
Pledge your loyalty to the jersey ok, but don't pledge it to ownership/management just bc it seems their interests suits your interest as a fan of the team.
The money being suggested is for callahan is absurd. I don't know if thats what he ends up signing for. So I have no idea if that is a number that is in conversation or has simply been put out there as the official top range.
I don't want management to throw elite level money at them to get a deal done. I want both of the players to be reasonable and I want management to be reasonable and deals to be made.
Cally and G could very well decide they are teaming up in Buffalo. I believe G's family is from toronto. Buffalo and Toronto are fairly close. Just watching the Bs and Sabres and Michaletti was talking about how the sabre owner wants to spend spend spend. Maybe G is willing to take a little less here if that means cally's staying but he's not taking less if he's not.
I don't know man. In the same way that Ive seen whats been coming for the last couple years, coming. If cally and G leave now I know whats coming going forward from that. The rangers aren't going to replace them and Staal gonna leave. And all of the sudden the Rangers have huge gaping holes.
Let's say that we can both disagree about this without having to question each other's allegiances to the team. I'm a big fan obviously, as I'm sure you are since we're both here talking about dealing maybes in detail.
Personally, I want the players for this team to be loyal to the team above all. If they're all good buddies, that means nothing to me unless it translates to good things for the team. Conversely, if they all hate each other off the ice but get 50 wins and a deep playoff run, their dislike for one another means nothing to me.
As for my own loyalty, like any fan, I like the team and I'm also attached to certain players. Having said that, the team is more important to me than any specific group of players. Maybe that's because of the way I got interested, as it seems that your attachment to this wave of homegrown guys is related to how you got interested in them.
I think everyone wants a reasonable deal to be made. The problem is, everyone defines what's reasonable differently. Callahan apparently thinks ~7 million for 7 years in reasonable. Sather apparently thinks ~6 for 5 years is reasonable. I think Sather happens to be closer to being right in that case, though I'm not a fan of the guy's contract decisions overall.
I think it's easy to assume that Callahan is playing a game of some sort because he's been the fearless leader for a while, but it seems from literally every indication that he isn't budging off of his demands, and the Rangers are so sure of this that they're aggressively shopping him. If that's the case, and again it appears to be from all indications, he's got to go.
I think you're being overly pessimistic assuming that them leaving is going to lead to huge holes. Sather has said he's going to deal them if they don't sign by the deadline. The past few years seem to have broken from the template of lazy, old, overpaid veterans coming here to retire, whether it's because Sather somehow learned something or because the other guys int he office are started to get their voices heard. If G is moved for Vaatanen (sp?) and a forward prospect, and Callahan is moved for either deal we've heard (for MSL with a + going that way, or for Stewart with a + coming back) the holes really aren't that bad. Staal is another story all together IMO.