Couldn't do this quote with embellishment from last thread.
Pace is furious. Have to squeeze in around work...
The reason the Rangers are trading Callahan is because they don't want to risk losing him for nothing as a free agent...which is exactly what can happen with Moulson.
So, no, it doesn't make sense.
Correct, except that if they throw us a small add, we can flip Moulson if we want and get roughly equal value for Callahan's return.
A Sabes fan said IHO, they've been wanting something around Miller for Pysyk
What about this as a counter?
But maybe the favor is
Cally + Girardi + Brassard
for
Pysyk + Ott + Moulson + Grigorenko
------------
They get Cally, we happy end him back home for his service.
They get Girardi, they have enough RD so they can flip him for max
Brassard is also UFA, but addresses C need, would be cheaper than Ott.
Rangers get a 1RD to complement McDonagh
Ott a UFA, but first crack to resign, easier w/no Cally Girardi
Moulson ditto, but more likely to sell to the highest bidder, short term rental
And Grigo = new project
Thoughts..............