stan the caddy
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2011
- 2,360
- 281
I voted for trade him for small package, but that's not really a fair choice as we don't know what the other offer was on the table. The poll makes it sound like we would be trading him for scraps.
No matter how you slice it, we would have been better off long term by trading for younger players and/or picks, rather than trading away picks for a player who may not be here for more than 1.25 years. We wouldn't have been better off THIS year, but it can't always be about this year, especially when THIS year we are nothing more than a bubble playoff team.
Yes, it is. Based on what other rentals were going for, it's completely unreasonable to think they would have gotten much.