I would indeed.. laff will be a force on the top line with a suzuki - and while he may nit score as many as CC, he brings the much needed size we so desperately need.You would actually trade a potential 35-40 goal scorer for an unproven player ?
I would indeed.. laff will be a force on the top line with a suzuki - and while he may nit score as many as CC, he brings the much needed size we so desperately need.You would actually trade a potential 35-40 goal scorer for an unproven player ?
Didn’t Hughes specifically state Habs wouldn’t be “targeting a star player like Malkin”these insiders are a joke Malkin to Montreal makes 0 sense
Didn’t Hughes specifically state Habs wouldn’t be “targeting a star player like Malkin”
"Most of the time, when I think about the free-agent market, Kadri will be available, Malkin will be available. I don't anticipate the Montreal Canadiens being in that market for the five-star free agents that will be available."
Yep, he specifically named Kadri/MalkinDidn’t Hughes specifically state Habs wouldn’t be “targeting a star player like Malkin”
Suzuki gonna make nearly 8M$. If Price is not out on LTIR, they have to cut some salaries. And someone has to replace Petry. They won't play three rookies on the blue line.Incredibly overblown... Check cap friendly for next year .
Also Petry is getting traded and the habs aren't adding much.
Suzuki gonna make nearly 8M$. If Price is not out on LTIR, they have to cut some salaries. And someone has to replace Petry. They won't play three rookies on the blue line.
Weber will be dealt for sure to Arizona.They dont have to cut any Salaries. They will be able to sign rem and romy and only have Harris and one of ghule/barron as rookies on the blue line without getting rid of anyone and weber on LTIR.
On top of that, the likelyhood of Petry and at least one other bad contract being moved this offseason is quite high
I go low on trade return so don't over estimated I find it better to have more in the end than I expected. No doubt a first for either of them are low balling. Imagine prospects plus a first be involved. Usually Hughes methodI'm pretty sure that if we get futures for both Petry and Dvorak (1st/2nd rd picks), some of it will be used to acquire young-ish players that fill needs before the 23-24 season.
Or, hear me out, draft Wright and sign PLD < 7M as a UFA to play the gritty LW on the first 2 lines if he still wants to come when we're trending up.Imagine Dubois signing only one year in Winnipeg. It's a real possibility. Maybe the guy doesn't like it there... most of us would not, right?
He stated many times he'd like to play in Montreal and reunite with friends and family.
IF he signs that contract before the draft or MTL gets info about it, would you trade our #1 pick for Laffy on draft day?
Wright is what NYR needs and pretty sure they'd consider it with their LW versus center depth. Picking up Wright wrongs the possibilty of PLD... as we'd already be too stacked at center.
Point is signing PLD next year is GREAT asset management. It will cost no assets while getting localstar Laffs in the process.
18m$ of it is going on LTIR....Habs have a cap "situation" themselves !
I disagee. This is loser thinking. I would always aim for the ultimate star player even if the chance of finding one is less than 1%.By the late 1st round, a 3rd line player is most likely what you will get. They have <30% chance of making the NHL by that point.
Kadri will be a huge mistake by the team signing him. He's good but his stats this season are not Kadri in the next 5 years without the AVS.Yep, he specifically named Kadri/Malkin
Kadri will be a huge mistake by the team signing him. He's good but his stats this season are not Kadri in the next 5 years without the AVS.
Happy that Hugues said no big ufas , so forget Bergeron Malkin Letang Forsberg Kadri
none of it is happening which is the good decision.
Im scared about Letang .... with Petry almost gone , i sure hope that Hugues dont give Letang big $$$$Kadri will be a huge mistake by the team signing him. He's good but his stats this season are not Kadri in the next 5 years without the AVS.
Happy that Hugues said no big ufas , so forget Bergeron Malkin Letang Forsberg Kadri
none of it is happening which is the good decision.
Russian players are dramatically undervalued in the NHL and it's a god damn shame because if NHL teams tried maybe 15% more to integrate Russian players (with better scouting, translators, cultural support, etc) they would benefit from a goldmine of talent.I disagee. This is loser thinking. I would always aim for the ultimate star player even if the chance of finding one is less than 1%.
I would never use a 1st round pick for a 3rd liner. I have seen the same story too many times already: Chipchura, Leblanc, Urquhart, Poehling, McCarron, De la rose, Natinnen I would rather use our best chances to find the next Kucherov, Kaprizov, Gaudreau or Kuznetsov. Stop it with these 3rd line talks, it reminds me so many bad memories of Trevor Timmins and this obession to avoid truly talented forwards. I wanna puke.
seeing their 5k stadium that would probably have 200 fans, and not even their logo, a weber contract is a financial must for that team. I would even say it might be one of the keys to their survival, with weber cap hit, that bring them to floor and his actually salary of 6mil for 4 years, they save about 25.5 million in actual cash vs cap floor. that is beyond huge for themWeber will be dealt for sure to Arizona.
This isn't a loser thinking, it's statistic based on years of NHL drafts results (chance probability, I remember one about quality but I can't find it anymore). Most late 1st round, if they make it to the NHL, are going to top as bottom 6/pair players regardless of their projection at the draft. The first half of the 2nd round has a better track record than 25-30 to produce NHLers actually.I disagee. This is loser thinking. I would always aim for the ultimate star player even if the chance of finding one is less than 1%.
I would never use a 1st round pick for a 3rd liner. I have seen the same story too many times already: Chipchura, Leblanc, Urquhart, Poehling, McCarron, De la rose, Natinnen I would rather use our best chances to find the next Kucherov, Kaprizov, Gaudreau or Kuznetsov. Stop it with these 3rd line talks, it reminds me so many bad memories of Trevor Timmins and this obession to avoid truly talented forwards. I wanna puke.
Leblanc's, for example, wasn't drafted to be a third line center. He was drafted to be a second line center. The Habs changed their minds afterwards due to Lefebreism.I disagee. This is loser thinking. I would always aim for the ultimate star player even if the chance of finding one is less than 1%.
I would never use a 1st round pick for a 3rd liner. I have seen the same story too many times already: Chipchura, Leblanc, Urquhart, Poehling, McCarron, De la rose, Natinnen I would rather use our best chances to find the next Kucherov, Kaprizov, Gaudreau or Kuznetsov. Stop it with these 3rd line talks, it reminds me so many bad memories of Trevor Timmins and this obession to avoid truly talented forwards. I wanna puke.
None of the players I listed were drafted to be on the 3rd line. Maybe Chipchura.. but they were considered safe prospect with higher floor and none of the stayed with the habs. They become AHLer or went on the have ok career.Can the Habs actually place both Price and Weber on LTIR?
Leblanc's, for example, wasn't drafted to be a third line center. He was drafted to be a second line center. The Habs changed their minds afterwards due to Lefebreism.
I was correcting a specific point but I agree. For the first three or four rounds the Habs should focus entirely on upside, as bottom six forwards and third pairing dmen are available for cheap on the UFA and trade markets all the time.None of the players I listed were drafted to be on the 3rd line. Maybe Chipchura.. but they were considered safe prospect with higher floor and none of the stayed with the habs. They become AHLer or went on the have ok career.
I want us to be more agressive and aim the players who are oozing talent but are dropping for a reason. Like Russian factor, like being below 5'7 or having not played a prominent role yet on a team, being from an unconventional route. You see the pattern. Focus on the upside instead of their 'floor'.
You just answered yourself. Focus on the russian and the smaller players.This isn't a loser thinking, it's statistic based on years of NHL drafts results (chance probability, I remember one about quality but I can't find it anymore). Most late 1st round, if they make it to the NHL, are going to top as bottom 6/pair players regardless of their projection at the draft. The first half of the 2nd round has a better track record than 25-30 to produce NHLers actually.
The 4 players you named dropped in the draft. Three had the "Russian Roulette Factor" attached. Gaudreau dropped because of size, but DeBrincat only dropped to the 2nd round. And after DeBrincat, Caufield only dropped out of the top 10. This year, Savoie will be dropping too, but probably not to the end of the 1st round.
The Russians will drop thought. The question is how many teams want to gamble on Miro's cancer on top of him being Russian and getting refused entry to US/Canada a few years ago. He's a top 10 talent in the draft thought.
Skinner 2.0Kadri will be a huge mistake by the team signing him. He's good but his stats this season are not Kadri in the next 5 years without the AVS.
Happy that Hugues said no big ufas , so forget Bergeron Malkin Letang Forsberg Kadri
none of it is happening which is the good decision.