The Habs don’t need PLD.
Which we shouldn't be doing right nowWill be a big asking price
Why?
Yeah, if he wants to sign here in 2 years, that's a good time frame for the rebuild. No rush to trade assets and improve too fast before the next draft.Which we shouldn't be doing right now
Jets may have another Trouba on their hands. PLD has two more RFA years then UFA. If any team tries to trade for him, they will likely want to talk extension and if he and his agent show signs of not wanting to sign, he value goes down.
Trouba had 50th in his last season with the Jets. I think the return was Pionk and the 20th pick? If it's a similar situation, we can offer something like Dvorak and the Flames 1st and maybe the Oilers 2nd. Or we just wait for him to reach UFA.
I think PLD would be a good add to this core.
Yup, Fox and Trouba are good example. Jets got Pionk and the 20th pick for Trouba. Dvorak and Flames 1st or let them drown with trade talk with other teams cause he will refuse to sign with them. No team is going to dig and give full value when they know he will walk in 2 years.
My gut tells me his heart is in Montreal and he wants to grow with this core. I think he will be a good add.
Seems really low value. Maybe Anderson+Dvorak+26th. About 10M cap going out, PLD probably going to cost around 9M to re-sign so cancels out. Even then not sure if that's good enough to tempt them to move him to MTL versus a team that might offer younger/cheaper NHL ready futures. Hoping they get Trotz and he wants more depth/physical players that can help them win now:
Connor - Scheifele - Wheeler
Ehlers - Dvorak - Anderson
recoup draft capital moving Petry.
Dadonov - Suzuki - Caufield
Dubois - Wright - Gallagher (PLD/Wright can take strong side faceoffs)
Drouin - Poehling - Armia
Pitlick - Evans - Byron
Pezzetta/Dauphin
move Hoffman
I wouldn't go that far. They don't need full price Dubois. But if Gorton has another Trouba deal in him (and there is zero evidence Dubois is angling for Montreal, only that he wants to test free agency) then it makes too much sense.
Dubois is probably the very ceiling of what Slafkovksy can be and he's 24. If you can avoid moving Suzuki, Caufield, Guhle and Montreal's 2022, 2023 or 2024 1sts, then you do it. The Trouba analogue would be something around Dvorak and Calgary's 1st.
But again, there's no evidence that this is a Trouba situation.
Yeah, if he wants to sign here in 2 years, that's a good time frame for the rebuild. No rush to trade assets and improve too fast before the next draft.
For PLD, while I agree him wanting out of his second team already is not a good look, those two teams are Columbus and Winnipeg lol.
Maybe. It is also possible he was just trying to find his groove with a new team and new role.Agreed. The only way I would engage now is if the cost is low (Dvorak and Flames 1st) and PLD wants to play nice on a long term extension. As the Habs GM and if the Jets call you, you can find this stuff out.
Ever consider that he wanted out from Columbus and to go to Montreal but we didn't have a Laine to trade for him at that point?
Look at how uninspired he was in that Jets/Habs playoff round? Not saying this is the truth but there are some dots you can connect in the guessing narratives.
I agree with you.I think you are pessimistic in your projections.
Looking at the way a lot of draftees played this season, the way they have dominated in their respective leagues , i think that Habs will get more than 2 good players. Also, a team doesn't need to get all players to be "core"player. Players as Evans, Pitlick, Byron, Anderson, Edmundson are good at their respective role even if they aren't elite.
Guhle , Baron, Harris, Roy, Ylönen, Farrel, Mysak are all interesting projects because of the kind of skills they get; good hockey IQ, good reading of the play. I wouln't be surprised if they all make the NHL ( not all with the Habs of course.) Then you add the Mailloux,Xhekaj, Dobes , Primeau, Struble...they aren't as sure shut , but some of them could also ends in the NHL
He also strikes me as mercenary and entitled, as talented as he is.The Habs are not going to pursue Dubois especially when he says he's going to test UFA.
Winnipeg will trade him as a rental to a team.
Then the Habs can decide to bid on him as a UFA. There's literally 0 to be gained to trade youth and assets for a guy who's wanting to go to UFA.
The thing with the Jets is, they have Connor, Ehlers, Morrisssey, Poink and Hellebyuk, with an age range of 25 to 29. I don’t see them 100% targeting futures when trading away PLD, Wheeler and Flanders. We can likely get PLD without trading away picks. The west is weak, and they can have a quick turnaround. Assets like Anderson would be valuable to them. My offer would be Anderson (28), Dvorak (26) and a prospect like Farrell for PLD.
He’s 25 and can be re-signed.Completely useless. We’re rebuilding and he’s UFA in 2 years.
Being able to discuss locking him into a new contract would need to be part of any trade discussion before a deal is made. Otherwise, there is no reason to trade assets for PLD right now.Completely useless. We’re rebuilding and he’s UFA in 2 years.
Why would we give assets now and risk losing him in 2 years when we could sign him for free in 2 years?He’s 25 and can be re-signed.
Because, as I said before, there is risk he is traded to a big market and signs long-term. That team can offer 8 years. I would rather get him now, let him be part of the culture, and get a better 8 year deal when the time is right. For Anderson, Dvorak and a B prospect, I would do it every time.Why would we give assets now and risk losing him in 2 years when we could sign him for free in 2 years?
Also, he would have to be open to playing LW.Being able to discuss locking him into a new contract would need to be part of any trade discussion before a deal is made. Otherwise, there is no reason to trade assets for PLD right now.
Don't think it makes sense to move prospects/high picks but roster players like Dvorak/Anderson/Edmundson (hometown boy)/etc I can see making sense. Dubois is just an year older than Suzuki.Why would we give assets now and risk losing him in 2 years when we could sign him for free in 2 years?
The idea would be to trade for him with the understanding that he’s signing long term. Like the Habs did with Drouin when they got him.Why would we give assets now and risk losing him in 2 years when we could sign him for free in 2 years?
Right, roster players would indeed make sense. But I can see Winnipeg holding out for a bigger package(with a 1st) given that Dubois is still considered as a C by most, and you know the center is a premium positionDon't think it makes sense to move prospects/high picks but roster players like Dvorak/Anderson/Edmundson (hometown boy)/etc I can see making sense. Dubois is just an year older than Suzuki.