I was more thinking it might cost a 1st to land Laine, and not just a 2nd. But Columbus may take back Amderson to balance the salaries.
With what Huges did with the Chiarot and Monhan 1sts (Newhook and Hage), I don't want to lose that 1st. But if Hughes thinks Laine will be a redemption case and even better than Newhook, I'm ok with giving up a late 1st - especially of we get to move Anderson too. If Laone works out, that's enough of a good use of a 1st. If he doesn't moving Anderson's extra year of a contract out isn't that bad. Hughes could do a lot with an extra 5.5M in cap space in a year we should be contending (2026-27).
Bit yeah, you don't give up a 1st to get rid of Anderson. You do it if you believe Laine can turn it back around and be a core piece, a finisher for playmaker Dach to play with.
Caufield - Suzuki - Slaf
Demidov - Dach - Laine
Roy - Hage - Newhook
I think that Hugues would rather keep that 1st too.
Whether you ask the other team to retain money or you give back a contract that is considered negative value, you gotta pay the price one way or another.
I don't think that the Habs have to do neither, as they have enough cap space. Makes no sense to pay for cap space you don't need.
At full salary, i don't think Laine is worth much. Friedman and Seravalli both said that he has probably negative value, but if enough teams are interested, maybe that can up his value a bit.
I don't see Hugues giving up that 1st nor a valuable guy like Struble for Laine. He'd be a temporary stop gap while the young Fs are developing.
Even if he ends up working out in Montreal, i don't think the Habs would give him a extension beyond the 2 years given his history. It'd be too much of a risk.
I'm not sure they'd have enough cap space going forward to pay him anyway.
As for Anderson, like i said, the longer they keep him, the easier it'll be to get rid of him, either by trade or buyout. As long as they don't need cap space, they don't have to do anything.