Boss Man Hughes
Registered User
- Mar 15, 2022
- 17,739
- 12,061
Who cares? Points were irrelevant. It's what they showed in their short audition.Hutson got less points in two games than Ryan Poehling got in his first game.
Who cares? Points were irrelevant. It's what they showed in their short audition.Hutson got less points in two games than Ryan Poehling got in his first game.
*Roy and Dach are uncertainties in terms of health.
*Talks about adding Laine.
Some people are born with the innate faculty to make absolutely no sense.
The bottom 6 may as well be a blender depending on who performs and who doesn’t.I'd prefer switching up the bottom two lines.
Roy-Newhook-Armia
Dvorak-Evans-Gallagher
Anderson is injury replacement or gets the Laval treatment - to rekindle the fire.
I think that is likely.Savard was not getting traded last deadline unless an overwhelming offer was made. At least a 1st round pick. He probably will be at this deadline if he is marketable.
That doesn't matter (KH didn't sign this deal) you just can't resign him or any other player to bigger deal, and if we do it as to be worth upsetting that balance.If we trade Anderson + for Laine, I'm 100% in. Columbus need to retain salary for 2 years though because Laine can't be pay more than Suzuki.
What is this silly premise that we can't pay anyone more than Suzuki? I love Suzuki but if we get Mcdavid,or some other superstar do you honestly think they will take less money because Nick Suzuki is on the team?That doesn't matter (KH didn't sign this deal) you just can't resign him or any other player to bigger deal, and if we do it as to be worth upsetting that balance.
I rather acquire Laine at a discount and paying is full salary than having to give up more value for them to retain...
I am telling you guys that the pairing of Mailloux with Xhekaj was excellent last season in Laval. That is a legitimate NHL future pairing.If Mailloux is better then Struble and Barron in camp, Struble will be sent down and Barron kept as 7 (or 8th) D.
I can see us carry 8D and 13F
Matheson-Guhle
Hutson-Savard
Xhekaj-Mailloux
Harris
Barron
It’s a nice problem to have.
If Mailloux is better then Struble and Barron in camp, Struble will be sent down and Barron kept as 7 (or 8th) D.
I can see us carry 8D and 13F
Matheson-Guhle
Hutson-Savard
Xhekaj-Mailloux
Harris
Barron
It’s a nice problem to have.
You might do that too at age 20 if you had a legit chance at a one million dollar salary within a year or so.Blind and delusional, there solved it for you.
1 - Why would Hutson sign a contract when he could have stayed in college?
2 - So who do you send on PP2 instead of Hutson? Barron?
He ain't Reinbacher or Mailloux, that's for sure.3 - Quinn Hughes was not Quinn Hughes after 2 games. No amount of AHL time will make him more ready for the NHL. He ain't Reinbacher or Mailloux, let him evolve where the talent is.
Possible yes, but where Mailloux has options. May have to let him season a bit moreIf Mailloux is better then Struble and Barron in camp, Struble will be sent down and Barron kept as 7 (or 8th) D.
I can see us carry 8D and 13F
Matheson-Guhle
Hutson-Savard
Xhekaj-Mailloux
Harris
Barron
It’s a nice problem to have.
You might do that too at age 20 if you had a legit chance at a one million dollar salary within a year or so.
Maybe, but there is also Guhle or Xhekaj or even Mailloux if he makes the team.
He ain't Reinbacher or Mailloux, that's for sure.
They can skate backwards way better than Lane.
They can defend better than Lane.
Mailloux has offensive skill as well as size and truculence.
Reinbacher has more experience against men.
Both are much faster than Lane.
Hutson is slippery and very creative but an NHL top-4 D needs a lot more than that. It will take him a while to acquire those additional skills. Let's be patient. I'd be happy for him to win the Calder Cup this year
lol at people thinking Hutson won’t make the team from training camp.
I will say something though. He will sit a certain amount of games because he is not physically ready to play 82 games.
he might not make it out of camp only due to the number of bodies on D. we carried three goalies last season until KH was happy with the trade return that made itself available. good thing is it's a lot easier to showcase defensemen for a trade than it is a goalie so that situation would probably resolve itself a lot more quickly.lol at people thinking Hutson won’t make the team from training camp.
I will say something though. He will sit a certain amount of games because he is not physically ready to play 82 games.
Sorry, were you saying something?Zegras... nah
Necas... nah
McGroarty... nah
Laine... nah
Joshua Roy... yup that's the one and if anyone in the top6 goes down to injury (a super rare occurrence, as we know) we can always slot in Sean Farrell. No need to acquire anybody. We have Michael Hage and Ivan Demidov coming in the future. Let's just sit tight while the Habs once again score the least number of goals in the Atlantic Division and are out of the playoff race by Christmas. It's called PROGRESS.
Joshua Roy for the Calder Trophy 2025. It'll happen, he just needs a clear path and ZERO internal competition for his spot. Better not put a hockey player under any pressure to perform. This is called good development.Sorry, we’re you saying something?
Still waiting on you to answer that basic question. Odd that you seem to be doing everything you can to avoid it.
Yeah,Joshua Roy for the Calder Trophy 2025. It'll happen, he just needs a clear path and ZERO internal competition for his spot. Better not put a hockey player under any pressure to perform. This is called good development.
Laine is a headcase with a high caphit, that's why we shouldn't acquire him... or Zegras, or Necas, or Rutger McGroarty who is none of those things. I'm definitely not a tankist wink wink.
Just realised... by "basic question" you mean a senseless point projection? I've already responded, I don't do that. Move from that BS.
Let me know when you can respond to the ultra-simplified breakdown I made for you. I even numbered and named the premises. Link to post #2,879Yeah,
That’s what I figured.
I’m done with you. If you want me to take you seriously, make more serious posts.Let me know when you can respond to the ultra-simplified breakdown I made for you. I even numbered and named the premises. Link to post #2,879
I said I want to add someone to the Top6... plenty of other commentators agree with the notion. We're having fun speculating about the fit of possible additions -- as we have done since the season ended and the rumours of Zegras et al. came up. Who's screaming? Nobody. Get a grip.I’m done with you. If you want me to take you seriously, make more serious posts.
You come in, scream that our top six sucks and when challenged in it, won’t tell us how you think they’ll produce. This reveals your dishonesty in terms of how you post here.
I’ve exposed it and that’s satisfaction enough for me.
Carry on with your ‘sky is falling’ nonsense.
In his second NHL game too.I watched the video @Lafleurs Guy posted of Hutson's shifts against Detroit. I forgot how impressive he was. So much poise, confidence, and ability to create and find open ice.
Haven't seen a habs d-man do that since Subban and Markov.
The only one of the above four players that I personally would be interested in the Habs acquiring would be McGroarty. I don't think Carolina is interested in trading Necas anymore after all their UFA defections, Laine I have discussed before (too in jury-prone to take the risk based on what Columbus will probably want), and Zegras would be adding another offense-only forward when the team already has Caufield and Demidov soon.Zegras... nah
Necas... nah
McGroarty... nah
Laine... nah
Joshua Roy... yup that's the one and if anyone in the top6 goes down to injury (a super rare occurrence, as we know) we can always slot in Sean Farrell. No need to acquire anybody. We have Michael Hage and Ivan Demidov coming in the future. Let's just sit tight while the Habs once again score the least number of goals in the Atlantic Division and are out of the playoff race by Christmas. It's called PROGRESS.