Goalfield13
In Bilbo We Trust
- Aug 31, 2021
- 2,482
- 3,598
If VAN trades EP over JT Miller, they are a bunch of morons.
Miller has a NMC, not Pettersson, they may not have a choice. Their core player is Hughes, who he sides with may also be important (no idea who that would be)If VAN trades EP over JT Miller, they are a bunch of morons.
NMCs can be waived, my friend, and reports suggest he would waive for NYR, who actually make good trade partners for them. I don't see them winning a trade with EP, and it could be a disaster for them.Miller has a NMC, not Pettersson, they may not have a choice. Their core player is Hughes, who he sides with may also be important (no idea who that would be)
For sure it Can be waived but if he only waives for NYR then NYR has all the leverage. It would likely also imply Zibanejab would go back which VAN may not be very interested in.NMCs can be waived, my friend, and reports suggest he would waive for NYR, who actually make good trade partners for them. I don't see them winning a trade with EP, and it could be a disaster for them.
Brock Nelson... a centre
thoughts? of a trade
They must have liked something about the way he played before signing him to a massive contract or else someone in the organization had a terrible lapse in judgement.VAN doesn’t like how he plays and they might want to get out from under than massive cap hit… basically, the assumption is they have cold feet.
They don’t want to rebuild though, so what can they do?
Even without any playoff situation, they might not move much unless they get high picks (1st/2nd rounds) and only Evans would bring that back and the current rumors is that Habs want to keep Evans and he want to stay.I might be wrong, but it feels like with the team doing well right now, HuGo might take a wait and see approach for a while. Trade talks may only pick back up closer to the deadline, where they'll know if this is a playoff situation or not.
NMCs can be waived, my friend, and reports suggest he would waive for NYR, who actually make good trade partners for them. I don't see them winning a trade with EP, and it could be a disaster for them.
That's always a question, but the rangers are ready for change, and I see them as a team that can and will part with key pieces that will interest vancouver instead of picks/prospects other teams would offer.Miller is open to waiving for the Rangers but who's going the other way? What player on the Rangers is going to waive to go to Vancouver?
That's always a question, but the rangers are ready for change, and I see them as a team that can and will part with key pieces that will interest vancouver instead of picks/prospects other teams would offer.
Laf and Schneider were discussed. I think a deal around Laf and EP would make sense.No way Zibby waives his NMC. And he's signed till 38 I believe. Even if he waives, doubt the Canucks want anything to do with that declining contract. Would be Huberdeau round two (Flames/Panthers trade with Tkachuk)
Who else? Trocheck? Also has a NMC but turns to 12 team NTC after this year. Age 31 with 4 years left.
If the Canucks trade either of Miller or EP... they will want a proven center in return no doubt in my mind! Rangers want to make moves but their multiple NMC/NTC they have for several players is a major factor.
Laf and Schneider were discussed. I think a deal around Laf and EP would make sense.
They will not get an equivalent C back in a trade for either one regardless. There will be a hole. This will not end well for VAN no matter what.That does not keep the Canucks competitive. Their center depth is not good with Miller/EP now and without one of them, it's much worse. Canucks need to get a proven center in return
Except if Laf Can play center it seems hard to imagine. Else I agree it could make sense value wise if you are high on LafLaf and Schneider were discussed. I think a deal around Laf and EP would make sense.
They will not get an equivalent C back in a trade for either one regardless. There will be a hole. This will not end well for VAN no matter what.
Like I said, I don't see a good C coming back either way. If they want value NOW to help for THIS season, NYR are the best fit. They would be better served going for a trade in the offseason instead.Except if Laf Can play center it seems hard to imagine. Else I agree it could make sense.
VAN still loses that trade with Buffalo. EP is too good for that package, IMO. After you trade that for EP, you are stuck with an ageing Miller. Franchise ruined. EP should not be dealt unless you do it in the offseason and get a great package back.Sabres might have the best offer but that is for EP... Cozens and Byram.
Do you now see why they are considering trading one or the other?
Dach
Matheson
Best of our 1st in 2025
One of Kapanen/Roy/Mailloux
Should be a package of interest for them.
Like I said, I don't see a good C coming back either way. If they want value NOW to help for THIS season, NYR are the best fit. They would be better served going for a trade in the offseason instead.
VAN still loses that trade with Buffalo. EP is too good for that package, IMO. After you trade that for EP, you are stuck with an ageing Miller. Franchise ruined. EP should not be dealt unless you do it in the offseason and get a great package back.
Beck and Hage are going nowhere for me.Agreed. All depends on what other teams offer and if that center is better than Dach. However, I think Dach has more value than what you see on HF boards. Problem is it needs to be supported with other very good parts and if one of picks is 11-15 range, that is a serious add.
Dach
* Replaceable center that still has value and stands to improve as he heads towards age 25+
* Still RFA after his current deal.
Habs 1st or Flames 1st:
* One or both of these picks will be 11-18 range.
* Anybody saying that trading these picks will "ruin" our future is just wrong.
Beck or Mailloux:
* I would avoid trading Kapanen and Hage
* Beck or Mailloux is a good A- or B+ prospect dangle. Both of these kids are not small and have good development grades.
Newhook and Matheson on the Table:
* I value these two but if the Canucks want both or one, sure.
EP has a NMC that kicks in July. Something worth mentioning. With Miller having a NMC, it makes it difficult to trade him for the best value they can get. EP is like the Subban situation if they move him. NMC clock is ticking but will draw interest from lots of teams.
Beck and Hage are going nowhere for me.
If we add an early 10's pick, the other piece we add can be a B prospect or a 2nd rounder.
Brock Nelson... a centre
thoughts? of a trade
I like him, but he's UFA. I don't think we should be picking up UFA players unless it's a sign & trade. He's also 33. NYI are only 4 pts out of a playoff spot, so I don't see them trading him unless they fall out further.
Standings are crazy tight in East.
Thank you for your kind comments. All I can say is that as I’m now working on my third marriage, I have obviously been wrong more than just one time.I've always enjoyed your takes/scouting, clear and present danger!
Thing is, i think other team Scouts also read your takes. so we aren't getting anything for Mailloux!! Ughh.. we gotta just hope you're wrong, just this one time..
I would be asking Santa for something else.seems posters want EP
let's see if KH delivers him for you