LaP
Registered User
Mailloux is definitely not untouchable. In fact he would probably be one of the first prospect i would trade providing the returning player would not be older than 26,
I disagree, buyer is when you use your picks and prospects to get rentals. Barron was waiver fodder. That's more on the side of change of scenery trade.The Barron for Carrier trade is also being a "buyer", if another such opportunity arises there's no reason to wait for the offseason.
Yeah Carrier-Barron was a cap dump vs failing prospect trade. Not the most common trade type but it wasn’t a straight up hockey trade.I disagree, buyer is when you use your picks and prospects to get rentals. Barron was waiver fodder. That's more on the side of change of scenery trade.
Define buying?We ain't buyers, that is for sure.
If the Canucks trade Petersson, retention will be null or negligible.If Canucks are willing to retain 50%
Within striking distance of the last wildcard spot I bloody hope the Habs don’t foolishly “buy”.Define buying?
If Habs are within 6pts of wildcard at deadline none of the pending UFAs will likely be dealt - which in essence would be “think of them as deadline acquisitions”
Using picks and prospects to get pending UFAs.Define buying?
If Habs are within 6pts of wildcard at deadline none of the pending UFAs will likely be dealt - which in essence would be “think of them as deadline acquisitions”
Also wouldn’t be shocked if HuGo would look into acquiring a veteran backup + 13F IF the price tag is mid round pick
I’m sure HuGo will use mid round picks without hesitation to go after veteran backup + 13F if availableUsing picks and prospects to get pending UFAs.
Sellers: trading pending UFAs for picks and/or prospects.
What's Dwight King up to these days?I’m sure HuGo will use mid round picks without hesitation to go after veteran backup + 13F if available
I would hate to give up Logan until he proves he cannot play in our system. A big RD that can provide offense, with albeit marginal defense at this point in time, is still a solid commodity to have in the system.Mailloux is definitely not untouchable. In fact he would probably be one of the first prospect i would trade providing the returning player would not be older than 26,
As always, it depends what’s coming back. Any player is tradable but I certainly wouldn’t give him away at this point.I would hate to give up Logan until he proves he cannot play in our system. A big RD that can provide offense, with albeit marginal defense at this point in time, is still a solid commodity to have in the system.
It's fat Tony loves himPierre Mcguire showing why he is NOT an NHL GM...
... and why he IS on Tony Marinaro's show instead...
I like Evans but signing him for more than 2 years would block Beck, Kapanen, Hage, or even a center drafted in the first round this year. Unless they are able to trade either Gally or Anderson.
Evans,a first( Calgary pick), Mailloux and Dach forDespite what we Habs fans might feel about the captain, over their careers to this point EP40 has been a better player than Suzuki. The question for the Habs is therefore: IF he's healthy and his intangibles are not problematic, how badly do the Habs want to have a Suzuki-Pettersson 1-2 punch? It won't be the toughest top6, it won't be the quickest top6, but one could say it would be very intelligent and reliable by virtue of just those two alone.
So let's say the Habs really want him (and think he will recover from whatever has been ailing him) and let's say the Canucks want to build a tough playoff-style team in the spirit of Rick Tocchet and JT Miller and therefore want to get out from under that commitment to EP40.
EP40's cap hit really sucks but they won't want to retain on it given the OEL fisaco, so let's forget that. What can we give to VAN to get EP40 that won't derail our own team rebuild?
How about something like Evans + Xhekaj + Mailloux + Dach
Evans is worth a 1st round pick and is in high-demand by playoff teams this year
Xhekaj is a tough defender who'd be loved by any playoff team
Mailloux is a floundering though high-upside prospect with a big frame
Dach is a hedge for Van for a top6 NHL C with a short contract commitment for evaluation purposes
It's a lot of NHL roster talent going out the door. Is it not enough? Is it laughable? I think the caphit puts a big damper on his trade price. See how CBJ paid us to take Laine... We're not privy to their conversations and interests but I'm thinking in terms of what the Habs can afford to lose without derailing the rebuild.
They will have to take back a Gallagher type contract then,If the Canucks trade Petersson, retention will be null or negligible.
Hockey trade with a western conference team. Help both for the final push.If the Habs keep this level of play up, I see them being pretty quiet at the deadline:
I don't see them buying (in terms of trading high picks for UFAs or similar) just to sneak into the playoffs against a higher seed.
I don't see them selling if there is a chance this group can make it into the WC because it would send the wrong message to a team rallying/desperate for some winning.
Maybe a minor tweak here and there but other than that I'd say it's status quo (as long as the team remains healthy).
if they are in the mix they will likely sell and buy. Move guys like Dvorak (if possible) and acquire a better player. Unless they bring up Beck and/or add Demidov and they just sell the Dvoraks.If the Habs keep this level of play up, I see them being pretty quiet at the deadline:
I don't see them buying (in terms of trading high picks for UFAs or similar) just to sneak into the playoffs against a higher seed.
I don't see them selling if there is a chance this group can make it into the WC because it would send the wrong message to a team rallying/desperate for some winning.
Maybe a minor tweak here and there but other than that I'd say it's status quo (as long as the team remains healthy).
Crosby!Evans,a first( Calgary pick), Mailloux and Dach for