HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #86: 2023-2024 Season

Status
Not open for further replies.

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
15,342
17,147
Here's my 3-step plan for the next 6 months:

1. Trade Monahan, Allen and Savard between now and the trade deadline. Should give us a couple nice picks or prospects in return.

2. Trade Matheson at the draft. Love him but his value will never be higher.

3. Depending on who we draft, acquire a young-ish winger with size to complete our top-6.

Potential targets:
Kakko, Laf, Necas, McCann...

Trade bait (in order of preference)
-One or more of Barron/Harris/Mailloux/Xhekaj
-One or more of Farrell/Roy/Mesar/Heineman
-Any 1st/2nd/3rd round pick acquired at the TDL (or CGY's)
-Newhook

*Steps 2 and 3 could also be linked if Matheson is traded for a forward with comparable value*
Multi year contracts (Matheson & Savard) are off season moves not trade deadline
 

NekkiChiconey

Registered User
Mar 17, 2016
850
1,136
Lisbon
Name a specific player or return for Matheson you would think "will never be higher" and that you would accept.

Matheson for Kakko, for example?
If it was Kakko, I would ask them to add. McCann from Seattle would be a good comparable. If we're talking futures, I would expect either a high first (top-15) or a late first (25-ish) and legit prospect.

Multi year contracts (Matheson & Savard) are off season moves not trade deadline
Mostly because teams don't want to retain on multi-year contracts but I think we could afford it for Savard (for the right return obviously). Savard at 1.75M for 2 playoff runs suddenly becomes very attractive to a contender.
 

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
15,342
17,147
If it was Kakko, I would ask them to add. McCann from Seattle would be a good comparable. If we're talking futures, I would expect either a high first (top-15) or a late first (25-ish) and legit prospect.


Mostly because teams don't want to retain on multi-year contracts but I think we could afford it for Savard (for the right return obviously). Savard at 1.75M for 2 playoff runs suddenly becomes very attractive to a contender.
Team organize their cap hit constructs in the offseason when they know which players are potentially available is UFA etc. Teams that deal for upgrades at deadline don’t want the asset burden past the given season - what a team needs at this deadline may not be a need for next season
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,815
10,796
Nova Scotia
Here's my 3-step plan for the next 6 months:

1. Trade Monahan, Allen and Savard between now and the trade deadline. Should give us a couple nice picks or prospects in return.

2. Trade Matheson at the draft. Love him but his value will never be higher.

3. Depending on who we draft, acquire a young-ish winger with size to complete our top-6.

Potential targets:
Kakko, Laf, Necas, McCann...

Trade bait (in order of preference)
-One or more of Barron/Harris/Mailloux/Xhekaj
-One or more of Farrell/Roy/Mesar/Heineman
-Any 1st/2nd/3rd round pick acquired at the TDL (or CGY's)
-Newhook

*Steps 2 and 3 could also be linked if Matheson is traded for a forward with comparable value*
I'd like to acquire Riley Heidt from the Wild. They ever get a deal on him. I hope Wild needs one of our vets at deadline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NekkiChiconey

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,968
37,323
Why would Lafreniere be available?
He's still pretty meh.

The hype of being a 1st overall pick would still carry value and they could get a nice return, or a good rental.

Could try and tell him they've given him prime opportunity and sign him long-term for depth. Give him 4 years at 3, or less
 

BaseballCoach

Registered User
Dec 15, 2006
21,276
9,605
If it was Kakko, I would ask them to add. McCann from Seattle would be a good comparable. If we're talking futures, I would expect either a high first (top-15) or a late first (25-ish) and legit prospect.

Agree Kakko 1-one-1 is a joke.

McCann is not enough. 1st pairing defender for middle-six forward, nah.
 

Deus ex machina

Registered User
Sep 12, 2023
656
545
That list is a big nothing. The "sellers" are teams who are at the bottom and not necessarily teams with extra goalies who have shown they can play in the NHL outside of the Habs (Columbus isn't trading Elvis and Martin was a waiver pick-up who isn't an upgrade for the buyers for example). While the buyers don't include teams outside of the playoffs who really need goalies to make it outside of Edmonton.

In other words, there is a lot less sellers with quality stock and a lot more buyers.
Someone said that Columbus is looking to trade Elvis actually. I think it's Friedman.
 

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
23,359
14,133
Allen will never get you a first.
Apparently Hughes has a known price that no one has bitten on yet. It’s not a 1st but 2nd, 3rd or an equivalent prospect wouldn’t be surprising. Lots of good teams with VERY bad goaltending, with oilers at the top of the heap followed by Toronto and Jersey. Suspect he’ll stand pat until desperation sinks in and take advantage to get close to his asking price, like a good GM would do.
 

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
23,359
14,133
Why would they do that?
They aren't making the playoffs that they need to start trading picks.
Better question is why would Matheson, a no. 1 D who’s on pace for 62 points and plays in all situations only get two 2nds, which is what Habs paid to get Newhook for, who as a forward is t close to that production??
 

Nicko999

Registered User
Jan 23, 2008
8,133
2,136
Montreal
He's still pretty meh.

The hype of being a 1st overall pick would still carry value and they could get a nice return, or a good rental.

Could try and tell him they've given him prime opportunity and sign him long-term for depth. Give him 4 years at 3, or less
Laf is improving slowly. On pace for 50 pts this year. It's not like he plateau-ed or something.
Would be our 3rd best forward.
 

McGees

Registered User
Jun 15, 2016
13,785
27,393
Better question is why would Matheson, a no. 1 D who’s on pace for 62 points and plays in all situations only get two 2nds, which is what Habs paid to get Newhook for, who as a forward is t close to that production??
I don’t remember writing that and the context tbh. But Matheson value is hard to gauge since he can put up points but also be an absolute disaster defensively.
 

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,482
156,988
Apparently Hughes has a known price that no one has bitten on yet. It’s not a 1st but 2nd, 3rd or an equivalent prospect wouldn’t be surprising. Lots of good teams with VERY bad goaltending, with oilers at the top of the heap followed by Toronto and Jersey. Suspect he’ll stand pat until desperation sinks in and take advantage to get close to his asking price, like a good GM would do.
Allen’s 2nd contract year is likely putting downward pressure on a return. A difference maker in facilitating a deal might be including a D, for a team that has the need.
 

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
23,359
14,133
Allen’s 2nd contract year is likely putting downward pressure on a return. A difference maker in facilitating a deal might be including a D, for a team that has the need.
Allen is an anchor for us but a better option than guys like Skinner or Samsonov and desperation makes GMs do desperate things. In any case, I’m sure whatever Habs get in return will be the best offer available.

I don’t remember writing that and the context tbh. But Matheson value is hard to gauge since he can put up points but also be an absolute disaster defensively.
He’s not that bad defensively. He’s even on the PK1 which isn’t saying much but for a team looming for offensive Dman, he’s fill the slot no problem. Also, Habs aren’t trading him anytime soon so this arguamwnt is moot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,482
156,988
Allen is an anchor for us but a better option than guys like Skinner or Samsonov and desperation makes GMs do desperate things. In any case, I’m sure whatever Habs get in return will be the best offer available.
If they can just get back the cap space Allen takes up, it’s already a win!
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,815
10,796
Nova Scotia
Apparently Hughes has a known price that no one has bitten on yet. It’s not a 1st but 2nd, 3rd or an equivalent prospect wouldn’t be surprising. Lots of good teams with VERY bad goaltending, with oilers at the top of the heap followed by Toronto and Jersey. Suspect he’ll stand pat until desperation sinks in and take advantage to get close to his asking price, like a good GM would do.
Wonder if Hughes retain half for a first?
 

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
23,359
14,133
Wonder if Hughes retain half for a first?
I would. One more year but Habs only have one more retention spot if memory serves correct. If they get another or two in the off-season it’s a no brainer for me. Still need to move Dvo IMO unless they don’t plan on back filling the 3rd line center role. Don’t think Evans can do it and Beck is too far away from it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

Deus ex machina

Registered User
Sep 12, 2023
656
545
If they can just get back the cap space Allen takes up, it’s already a win!
And do what with it?
They have potentially about 10M of unused cap space right now. They'll probably have plenty next season too.

I think it's more about freeing a roster spot and getting an asset.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuGort

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,482
156,988
And do what with it?
They have potentially about 10M of unused cap space right now. They'll probably have plenty next season too.

I think it's more about freeing a roster spot and getting an asset.
Attempt more Monahan-type trades.

Of course, there is a logjam to sort out but the point was that even if not getting a high return for Allen, it’s still a net positive. Cap room can always be bartered.
 

Deus ex machina

Registered User
Sep 12, 2023
656
545
Attempt more Monahan-type trades.

Of course, there is a logjam to sort out but the point was that even if not getting a high return for Allen, it’s still a net positive. Cap room can always be bartered.
They weren't able to do one this season so far. They'll probably have enough cap space for that next season even with Allen.
With the flat cap era coming to an end, i think there'll be less of those types of trade anyway.
They're pretty rare as it is. Teams don't want to give up assets for that unless really desperate.

And that phase of the Habs rebuild is almost over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boss Man Hughes

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,482
156,988
They weren't able to do one this season so far. They'll probably have enough cap space for that next season even with Allen.
With the flat cap era coming to an end, i think there'll be less of those types of trade anyway.
They're pretty rare as it is. Teams don't want to give up assets for that unless really desperate.

And that phase of the Habs rebuild is almost over.
It’ll be great just to get rid of him. Hughes needs to correct that mistake contract of his.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad