HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #86: 2023-2024 Season

[Kosseca]

With guys like Anderson and Armia, I'm ready to take back equally bad contracts in terms of term and cap hit, and for a worse player, as long as we get a future in the deal.

So my NYR Anderson trade is:

To NYR: Anderson (50% retainted) + ?
To MTL: Kakko + Barclay Goodrow

Rangers get to camp dump Goodrow, plus Anderson's size and Speed for the playoffs at 2.75M AAV on the cap.
We get Kakko. Plus Goodrow can fight and take away from the amount Xhekaj fights. Though Xhekaj seems to be doing well now. Or Goodrow can just be sent to Laval.

I dont think you can retain on Anderson. contract is too long and Kakko+Goodrow = Anderson cap hit. Goodrow's contract is bad so the + would be minimal in my view

 

[Rapala]

I could use a cherry blossom but they don't have those in Texas

Still one of the best.
I find their recipe is close to the original and most other chocolates have suffered the same fate as many of our processed food stuffs.
Quality has been thrown out the window for profits.
Cherry Blossoms have only shrunk.

 

[Adam Michaels]

 

[morhilane]

Whatever happened to Ryan. He was more highly touted in Minor Hockey than his big brother and was drafted 1st overall in the O. Does anyone have any insight as to why his development slowed?

Ryan had a lot of big injuries since he was drafted, missed a lot of games.

 

[McGees]

12 years married. 19 years together. Trying to take her up on that offer doesn't work anymore.

Wow exact same numbers for me

 

[Colezuki]

Wow exact same numbers for me

maybe you two are married to each other

 

[26Mats]

I dont think you can retain on Anderson. contract is too long and Kakko+Goodrow = Anderson cap hit. Goodrow's contract is bad so the + would be minimal in my view

The retention on Anderson plus Goodrow's contract are roughly equivalent to what we are currently stuck with for Anderson. So, we're just swapping Anderson, who doesn't fit in MSL's system, for Goodrow, who could fill a 4th line role well. Then we add Kappo. For sure, the only reason we swap Amderson for lesser player Goodrow at essentially the same cap hit, and lose a retention spot for the next 3 years, and give up another asset, is if you believe Kakko can become something.

 

[Kosseca]

The retention on Anderson plus Goodrow's contract are roughly equivalent to what we are currently stuck with for Anderson. So, we're just swapping Anderson, who doesn't fit in MSL's system, for Goodrow, who could fill a 4th line role well. Then we add Kappo. For sure, the only reason we swap Amderson for lesser player Goodrow at essentially the same cap hit, and lose a retention spot for the next 3 years, and give up another asset, is if you believe Kakko can become something.

if the retention was for a yr or two, that would work, but this year + 3 ? I dont think you can do that.

 

[26Mats]

if the retention was for a yr or two, that would work, but this year + 3 ? I dont think you can do that.

If Dach wasn't yet a Hab and Dach was the young player coming our wa yin the deal instead of Kakko, would you be willing to retain 3 years on Anderson to get the deal done to bring in Dach?

 

[morhilane]

I suspect this year is going to go down as the trade deadline with the most extensions and the least trades in NHL history. We aren't even seeing the AHL level players on NHL contracts to boost affiliates teams trades.

The market must be crazy expensive or the contender GM extremely cheap...maybe both...for it to have no velocity.

 

[BLONG7]

I don't think he sells Anderson 20 cents on the dollar.................just a terrible terrible year for a 20 goal guy. I think the reset button gets hit next year, and we see Anderson come back to the player he can be.
That said, wouldn't mind see him traded either, I just don't see Hughes doing it, when he does not have any leverage....

 

[Le Barron de HF]

I suspect this year is going to go down as the trade deadline with the most extensions and the least trades in NHL history. We aren't even seeing the AHL level players on NHL contracts to boost affiliates teams trades.

The market must be crazy expensive or the contender GM extremely cheap...maybe both...for it to have no velocity.

Those happen on deadline day usually.

 

[LaP]

 

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

So what are you saying those are not Ranger scouts at Hab games but mafia hitmen?

100%.

He's there to "make a splash"

Get rid of some "dead weight"

 

[Kosseca]

If Dach wasn't yet a Hab and Dach was the young player coming our wa yin the deal instead of Kakko, would you be willing to retain 3 years on Anderson to get the deal done to bring in Dach?

Fair point. Never looked at this that way.

 

[LaP]

Holy *** Briere is crazy. That's 3 millions a year for 4 years to 30 years old Seeler. That's brutal. This contract wont age well at all.

 

[red devil]

 

[Mcdonaldz]

That would be an easy yes but Tkachuk is worth a lot more then Caufield.

Caufield, a first, Harris ? Farrell ?

 

[sampollock]

PHILLY sign your d men, that helps KH alot

 

[red devil]

 

[Boss Man Hughes]

Caufield, a first, Harris ? Farrell ?

Not a chance. Caufield and a 2nd is the most they should go. Unless we are talking Matt.

 

[red devil]

 

[Boss Man Hughes]

So Ottawa is going for the perpetual rebuild.

 

[LaP]

So Ottawa is going for the perpetual rebuild.

Tarasenko is UFA. Was probably not going to resign.

 

[morhilane]

Those happen on deadline day usually.

Trade per day should have started to pick up by now, actually since last week, and this include a few AHL players (and player's rights who don't want to sign with a team -aka NCAA - like Thrun last year). It's been like that for the last few years.

The cover from 7 days to 4 days (yesterday for this year) before the deadline in amount of trades:
- 2024: 1
- 2023: 18
- 2022: 7
- 2021: 7
- 2018: 8

Today should have at least 3 trades to just be a normal "deadline is in 2 days" day. Looks like we have 1 at least.