sampollock
Registered User
agreed, until he is traded or not . it is just opinions' by all of usWhy is it so obvious? Because he's not here yet? These type of trades take a while.
agreed, until he is traded or not . it is just opinions' by all of usWhy is it so obvious? Because he's not here yet? These type of trades take a while.
“The stories, all names, characters, and trade values portrayed or proposed on this site are fictitious. No identification with actual trades is intended or should be inferred.If Zegras is such a garbage player and highly paid to boot why would he cost Mailloux+1st?
I think Bolts know they won't go far anyways if they make the playoffs so why bother wasting assets. They got one of the worst prospect pools in the league.What are the chances of prying Isaac Howard from Tampa for a defenseman + with Sergachev out?
Why is it so obvious? Because he's not here yet? These type of trades take a while.
Who have we been rumoured to be linked too?No because he's not the profile of any player they've targeted. It's pretty clear what they value if you look at their draft record, their trade history, and who they have been linked to.
Nah, it's just exactly the same as the Dubois situation. Heavily flawed player that will likely be a net negative while on the ice, and off it too, that many of us do not want anywhere near the team. It's another 60 point soft player, although I'll grant that Zegras does have more untapped potential than Dubois did.Habs fans are apparently allergic to talented players until they see them play. Can’t blame them, last highly skilled forward we had was Kovalev, and we all know he was a defensive beast!
AWESOME declaimer....lol“The stories, all names, characters, and trade values portrayed or proposed on this site are fictitious. No identification with actual trades is intended or should be inferred.
HF assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. The information contained in this site is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness.
User names can be anyone or anything. HF does not verify who is a Champion, a Runner or whatever. Consume at your own risk and peril.”
Probably slim to none. They might be losing Stamkos next summer so trading a soon to be 20 years old good prospect would be counter productive. With Sergachev likely out for the year they should just forget the cup and move on.What are the chances of prying Isaac Howard from Tampa for a defenseman + with Sergachev out?
So far he was on the winning team at the WJC and crap teams on Anaheim. How do we know he isn't willing to put in the work to win?No because he's not the profile of any player they've targeted. It's pretty clear what they value if you look at their draft record, their trade history, and who they have been linked to.
Who have we been rumoured to be linked too?
So far he was on the winning team at the WJC and crap teams on Anaheim. How do we know he isn't willing to put in the work to win?
No because he's not the profile of any player they've targeted. It's pretty clear what they value if you look at their draft record, their trade history, and who they have been linked to.
They were in on PLD. They drafted Slafkovsky. They targeted Dach. Newhook isn't big but he plays an inside game. They were completely off on Michkov. They passed on guys like Tolvanen on waivers.
Because he hasn't and Anaheim has been wanting to get rid of him since they brought Verbeek on board. He was terrible this year and the question among every front office is whether he's a guy you can win with and the Ducks didn;t do a whole lot of winning with him in premium positions on the team.
Newhook has speed and character. But he plays small. So I interpreted the Newhook acquisition as a sign that they'll bring in a variety of players if they think they're good and available, not just big ones.No because he's not the profile of any player they've targeted. It's pretty clear what they value if you look at their draft record, their trade history, and who they have been linked to.
Wow, Mantha scoring at a 28 goals per 82 games this season.
Newhook has speed and character. But he plays small. So I interpreted the Newhook acquisition as a sign that they'll bring in a variety of players if they think they're good and available, not just big ones.
Montreal wouldn't even offer it.
If Zegras is such a garbage player and highly paid to boot why would he cost Mailloux+1st?
Why is it so obvious? Because he's not here yet? These type of trades take a while.
I'd do it. And I like Mailloux.I do think they would do it. 2 big question mark for at least a top 6 player
If we waste assets on this guy I'm gonna flipwhat goal scoring? He’s got 4 this year. His career high is 23. Caufield had 26 last year in 46 games. Zegras had 23 in 81. You guys make Zegras sound like he’s Mats Naslund or something.
Haven't heard anything about Verbeek wanting to get rid of him until recently.They were in on PLD. They drafted Slafkovsky. They targeted Dach. Newhook isn't big but he plays an inside game. They were completely off on Michkov. They passed on guys like Tolvanen on waivers.
Because he hasn't and Anaheim has been wanting to get rid of him since they brought Verbeek on board. He was terrible this year and the question among every front office is whether he's a guy you can win with and the Ducks didn;t do a whole lot of winning with him in premium positions on the team.
But were the other GM's asking about him?LeBrun being interviewed on BPM right now.
Saying that Habs are not calling teams about Matheson and Savard. However, doesn’t mean they won’t be traded.
He used the example of Lehkonen who also wasn’t on the market. But then, Sakic called Hughes for 17 consecutive days and his early “nos” turned into a yes.
Savard at 3.5M, with playoff experience and an extra contract year is in a different place than Tanev as he’s not merely a rental player. One thing is certain, based on all the contacts LeBrun has made with other GMs, Savard’s name has never been pitched by the Habs.
I can’t recall LeBrun saying anything about it.But were the other GM's asking about him?
Thanks. If he is available Hughes is likely going to let the other GM's initiate the discussion. If they ask if he is available he should reply asking what they are ffering.I can’t recall LeBrun saying anything about it.