HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #86: 2023-2024 Season

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
55,269
71,016
It potentially means he's not a part of the long-term plans - for better or worse. Great if he sucks and we can move on, a bit worrisome if he performs and we have to try and re-sign him (which is not entirely a bad thing given that it means he performed well). The nice part is that we'll still likely have a lot of cap space when both Dach (RFA) and Laine (UFA) are talking extension. If we're a competitive team with cap space and he likes it here, we'd just need to be confident in what we've built. I think there's going to be a pretty small market for him given the contract and injury situation.

I also think the Jackets should trade him in the off season and attempt to get his value back up for the rest of the season. They run the risk of him entering Monahan/pure cap-dump territory, but it might also mean a much bigger payout. Might also work better for MTL given our aspirations to reach bottom-5.
I just don’t see the point of wasting assets if you’re not envisioning him as part of the future. You want him to become that consistent 40 goal guy in the 6’5 frame. I’m not too worried about how much he would cost (in fact he will likely be cheaper than what he currently makes), it’s moreso that he wouldn’t want to be here. I know we aren’t the Sens level pathetic but Chychrun wants out despite looking like he might stay. Sens won’t be getting the same value as they paid if they flip him so they just lost assets. With Laine and his poor effort consistency in a hot market, I could see him wanting out unless we are a lock for the playoffs before he needs a new contract.

I don’t think it will ever become a Monahan/cap dump scenario as they won’t be desperate to get rid of him by adding assets. Flames did it so they can sign Kadri and be competitive, Jackets won’t be competitive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee

Canadienna

Registered User
Jan 27, 2015
13,036
18,432
Friedman saying on 32T that Monahan's "baseline" value is lower than a 1st, but a bidding war or team looking to extend could change things.

Also said he wouldn't be a fit as a 2C on a contender.

Probably both fair comments, but I feel like he's always down on Habs players.
 

Egresch

Registered User
Jul 10, 2022
1,060
1,466
Honestly, I would prefer any of CBJ Russians Chinakhov, Voronkov, Marchenko over Laine. IMO, they all have untapped potential while Laine might be a guy on decline.
 

Guy Larose

Registered User
Jan 25, 2018
2,421
3,456
Friedman saying on 32T that Monahan's "baseline" value is lower than a 1st, but a bidding war or team looking to extend could change things.

Also said he wouldn't be a fit as a 2C on a contender.

Probably both fair comments, but I feel like he's always down on Habs players.
It's funny when they say stuff like that because it means he won't be wrong in the end. He's right whatever pick they get for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canadienna

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,411
156,699
While no player is sacrosanct, you trade away a player with Matheson's elite mobility at your team's peril.
His focus also has elite mobility — it’ll go from 100 to zero and back, within seconds.

This is a guy you don’t want on first pairing or playing 27 mins + per game. He could be so much better if properly managed but on a team with so many young players, it’s clear that he won’t be properly deployed.
 

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,280
20,596
Quebec City, Canada
Pierre McGuire says on Tony's podcast, habs should not trade Mike Math but extend him.

I say trade him if Kent can get good trade back
Matheson has two years left. He can't be extended before summer 2025. Why talk about extending him now since we don't know what will happen until then. Matheson wont be traded until the last year of his contract.

Rutger McGroarty​

Wont happen. But if it does you take the offer and run as fast as you can to have the traded approved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77

c3z4r

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
6,279
3,378
in the world
Friedman saying on 32T that Monahan's "baseline" value is lower than a 1st, but a bidding war or team looking to extend could change things.

Also said he wouldn't be a fit as a 2C on a contender.

Probably both fair comments, but I feel like he's always down on Habs players.
When was the last time, if ever, that Friedman has accurately called out a Habs trade?
 

Adriatic

Registered User
Feb 27, 2004
6,767
4,662
Love adding talent but we can't forget about toughness. We're too soft and too nice up front. I would love to add a player or two than can play with some nastiness to spark the team at times.
 
Last edited:

Ranger12

Registered User
Jul 29, 2021
73
69
Love adding talent but we can't forget about toughness. We're too soft and too nice up front. I would love to add a player or two than can play with some nastiness to spark the team at times.

Move Xhekaj to the wing like some have suggested.

The next Wendel Clark...lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: calder candidate

Milhouse40

Registered User
Aug 19, 2010
22,566
25,695
Friedman saying on 32T that Monahan's "baseline" value is lower than a 1st, but a bidding war or team looking to extend could change things.

Also said he wouldn't be a fit as a 2C on a contender.

Probably both fair comments, but I feel like he's always down on Habs players.

Monahan is 100% worth a 1st if he's healthy and play.....but his multiple long injuries in each of the last couple of year is still a red flag for every buying team.

Because of that, I think a conditional 1st round pick is the best outcome here
If he stay healthy it's a 1st, if not it's a 2nd.
 

eklund the clown

Registered User
Dec 28, 2010
2,295
2,591
The Kings would have to eat at least half of Dubois contract for 8 years just to get rid of him.I am not even sure i would take him at that price let alone give anything up to get him.He seems to be a lazy hard to please whiner wherever he goes.What would be any different here?Wasn't it said that Hugo never tried to acquire him in the 1st place.?
 
  • Like
Reactions: McEsenpi

vokiel

#DanzeMolsonMix
Jan 31, 2007
18,703
4,269
Montréal
If you add Matheson to Monahan, I think theyd at least listen. They get a top 4 offensive dmen in his peak at cheap money and a 2-3 C that they can resign if they want
It doesn't matter, Leonard is an unsigned NCAA prospect with lower than a year in the Caps corp structure. No trades involving him should happen, unless he goes crazy.

We passed for Rainmaker... That's all..
 

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
17,739
12,061
Are you sure? Cause I'll bet he doesn't even watch those. He's too busy looking in the mirror working on his hair.
It looks like that after he has worked on it?????????////

It doesn't matter, Leonard is an unsigned NCAA prospect with lower than a year in the Caps corp structure. No trades involving him should happen, unless he goes crazy.

We passed for Rainmaker... That's all..
Well Leonard doesn't look that good. reinbacher should be the better choice.

Edit: Leonard did nothing at the beginning of the season. He has picked it up though.
 
Last edited:

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
23,349
14,113
Friedman saying on 32T that Monahan's "baseline" value is lower than a 1st, but a bidding war or team looking to extend could change things.

Also said he wouldn't be a fit as a 2C on a contender.

Probably both fair comments, but I feel like he's always down on Habs players.
If Monahan was a Leaf, starting price would be a top 10 pick, a previous top 10 pick and the trading GMs first born child, to start with.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad