Toggle sidebar

HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #85 - Offseason Editon

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Garry Valk said:
Not sure about that, the three goalie thing has a lot more to do with losing Primeau than anything else.
Click to expand...

It's part of it.. Monty wants to stay in Montreal, but Montreal is weary of small sample sizes and paying goalies based on spotty track records.

If they can't find a move for Allen, they may sell Monty as a rental.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garry Valk
Andy said:
Let's get completely nuts:

Monahan
Montembault
Harris

for
1st round pick
2nd round pick
Holloway
Bourgeault
Ceci (cap dump)

Pay up dumb oilers.
Click to expand...

It would be a big risk for the Oilers to go with Montembault...

And how good are Holloway and Bourgault. They made names for themselves at lower levels, but will it translate to the NHL? I'm only giving up Monahan for young playes I believe in...

But if Monteambault is asking for too much money and/or term, he is the one who should be moved. We don't want to be locked into a bad contract and we can roll with Allen and Primeau until we find the goalie of the future.
 
Andy said:
Let's get completely nuts:

Monahan
Montembault
Harris

for
1st round pick
2nd round pick
Holloway
Bourgeault
Ceci (cap dump)

Pay up dumb oilers.
Click to expand...

Would take the risk in keeping Monahan till the trade deadline. If hes healthy, with the type of production hes showing, we could trade him for a first and a better prospect than those two
 
eklund the clown said:
No team in their right mind will take on Huberdeau contract
Click to expand...
Only team that might make sense according to their internal logic would be the Pens, like they went for EK.

I would consider this an horrible move, but they're the emblematic team of going all in and whatever happens happens afterwards.
 
It would be so nice for us to target Will Cuylle in a Monahan trade! Rangers are thin in center line, and deep on the wings and they are win now. Cuylle could replace Anderson while being potentially better and than trade Anderson.
 
Andy said:
Let's get completely nuts:

Monahan
Montembault

for
1st round pick
2nd round pick
Holloway
Bourgeault
Ceci (cap dump)

Pay up dumb oilers.
Click to expand...
I'm down trading Monahan for this package. Decent assets picked up + it improves our lottery odds and hopefully means one less competitor by preventing Oilers to keep s*cking.
 
Gallagher, Anderson, 1st CGY for Huberdeau and Wolf

Allen (50%) for Bourgeault 2nd Foegle/McLeod
 
Kwikwi said:
Gallagher, Anderson, 1st CGY for Huberdeau and Wolf

Allen (50%) for Bourgeault 2nd Foegle/McLeod
Click to expand...
No way we're letting go of CGY's 1st, it's already tracking like a lottery pick. And if we ever dangle it, it won't for a horrible contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morhilane
WeThreeKings said:
No. There is 0 good about having Huberdeau eating near 11m of our cap when he's a broken down husk of a man just as we are trying to compete.

Not to mention we are giving up the best asset in the deal.
Click to expand...
you dont like 2 times best ahl players in a row Dustin Wolf?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarioLeMoose
Takeru said:
No way we're letting go of CGY's 1st, it's already tracking like a lottery pick. And if we ever dangle it, it won't for a horrible contract.
Click to expand...
The pick is in 2025 since the rule is that to be in 2024, Calgary pick needs to be between 20-32. So no chance it is involved this year.

nhlfan9191 said:
Not at the price of taking on the worst valued contract in the league for the next decade.
Click to expand...
We give bad contracts too. Anderson and Gallagher are not good value contrat. And 2 for 1, it take a spot for a kid in the lineup.
 
I think Buffalo should go for a goalie as well, Levi belong in the AHL right now and Comrie is injured and he's not a reliable backup.

They should go for Allen for a 2nd round pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings
Kwikwi said:
The pick is in 2025 since the rule is that to be in 2024, Calgary pick needs to be between 20-32. So no chance it is involved this year.


We give bad contracts too. Anderson and Gallagher are not good value contrat. And 2 for 1, it take a spot for a kid in the lineup.
Click to expand...
It’s worse then Gallagher’s contract and twice as long. And the cap hit is so high that it would completely cripple us when we’re in what should be our competing window. There’s no GM in the league that would go near Huberdeau’s contract. It’s about as bad as it gets in the cap era.
 
Garry Valk said:
Not sure about that, the three goalie thing has a lot more to do with losing Primeau than anything else.
Click to expand...
Why would they care about losing Primeau to waivers if they had what they deemed to be a true #1 in Monty? And that’s assuming Primeau even gets claimed at the beginning of the season, I’m not sure that he would have been.
 
Kwikwi said:
The pick is in 2025 since the rule is that to be in 2024, Calgary pick needs to be between 20-32. So no chance it is involved this year.


We give bad contracts too. Anderson and Gallagher are not good value contrat. And 2 for 1, it take a spot for a kid in the lineup.
Click to expand...
I know, my point was I don't see CGY turning it around next year when they're already off to a bottom 3 start this year.
The more optimistic scenarios at the time of the trade had them imploding next summer, they're already well ahead of schedule and have to resign their 1C and 2/3 of their D corps.
No way they'll be a much better team next year, I assume they'll have to start rebuilding and selling as soon as this year's deadline.
 
nhlfan9191 said:
It’s worse then Gallagher’s contract and twice as long. And the cap hit is so high that it would completely cripple us when we’re in what should be our competing window. There’s no GM in the league that would go near Huberdeau’s contract. It’s about as bad as it gets in the cap era.
Click to expand...
Legit. For me Wolf is appealing. Huberdeau is managable. He is a ppg player for the next 4 years. After hes going to be a nightmarish topic.

Anderson and Gallagher had 32pts/69g 14pts/37g last year Thats less than Huberdeau horrible 55 points season.

Unless we give Huberdeau money to Nylander. There are not much possibility on the market. (which we wont have because we are stuck with bad contracts)

Takeru said:
I know, my point was I don't see CGY turning it around next year when they're already off to a bottom 3 start this year.
The more optimistic scenarios at the time of the trade had them imploding next summer, they're already well ahead of schedule and have to resign their 1C and 2/3 of their D corps.
No way they'll be a much better team next year, I assume they'll have to start rebuilding and selling as soon as this year's deadline.
Click to expand...
a pick next year is ready in 5-6 years.
 
Kwikwi said:
Legit. For me Wolf is appealing. Huberdeau is managable. He is a ppg player for the next 4 years. After hes going to be a nightmarish topic.

Anderson and Gallagher had 32pts/69g 14pts/37g last year Thats less than Huberdeau horrible 55 points season.

Unless we give Huberdeau money to Nylander. There are not much possibility on the market. (which we wont have because we are stuck with bad contracts)


a pick next year is ready in 5-6 years.
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter when it's ready, point is it has extremely high odds of being a vastly more valuable asset than frickin Wolf along with one of the absolutely worst contracts in the NHL atm in terms of duration/cap hit.

Moving on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom