Jaynki
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2014
- 5,871
- 6,054
A good subjective argument that may be valid in a discussion like should we draft him or Wright? It does not make it an intelligent argument to cap his ceiling as a 3M player or a 3rd liner.Which level of hockey except no-NHLer COVID olympics where even many European stars sat out did Slaf show he was an impact player at? Sean Farrell played three less games than him and was only a point behind at the same olympics.
Its again not looking in the right direction,Even pre-seasons, practices, scrimmages, etc, Slaf has never shown any elite skill. Huberdeau was a guy who rose from 2nd round to 3rd overall in a couple of months because we was undeniably talented. I guarantee Slaf would have never sniffed the top 5 if there hadn't been so many league shutdowns during COVID.
True.Anyway, Slaf's play means he's not even close to getting a raise in the near future.
But he played 50 games and there is still 150 remaining until the end of his ELC. So i think we should take a measured approach here and see.
32 teams out of 32 would pay him 6.3M on a 1 year term and for the price of a late 1st to steal him from us. I guarantee it with same vigor you guarantee he would not be a top 5 pick if it was not of Covid.There's no team in the league that would even give him the Kotkaniemi contract right now out of his ELC.
I would not say its something fixed already.He is absolutely going to be bridged at this point.
Even if you dislike the player and think he is a bust, you are still betting against a 19 years old who is in his windows of maximum growth and he may turn things on a dime. It happens just so frequently with young players age 19-23.
The vast majority of 19 years old who played NHL in their D+2 have ended top of the line-up player in their career. Slafovsky is trending in that category whatever subjective perception you have of the players. There is still a possibility he bust tho don't get me wrong, but the best odds are that he ends up somewhere between a top 6 forwards and a star. Also, please note that its irrelevant if you think Slafkovsky is CHL caliber and he should not be in the NHL. The cold hard fact is that he is an NHLer in his D+2.
Otoh, the vast majority of NHL players are on the decline at 30 years old and the decline can be drastic and on a dime too. Huberdeau has the worst contract of the league and he already has showed big sign of decline. The best odds right now are not for him to become his former self who set records, its for him to continue his steep decline rapidly and be an absolute heavy burden.
We should absolutely, absolutely refrain on capping a 19YO NHLers ceiling or already betting on stagnation. Its short sighted.
Last edited: