- Jun 24, 2012
- 86,607
- 161,678
So apparently, Dreger on TSN690 this morning said Habs have interest in Xavier Bourgeault of the Oilers, their 2021 1st round pick (22nd OA).
No way we're letting go of CGY's 1st, it's already tracking like a lottery pick. And if we ever dangle it, it won't for a horrible contract.
They'll use their last retention spot to get Bourgault or a 1st. What better would we hope to get with that retention spot?They won't use their last retained spot to get Bourgault. Boutgault and a 1st for Allen and something else maybe.
Bourgault and Edmonton's 1st are not equal. Edmonton's 1st could be a very high pick. I am sure they would do that. Bourgault is not enough. Bourgeault and a 2nd maybe. They may be able to use their cap space at the deadline for a 1st+.What would go the other way?
Primeau? Allen 50% retained? Montembault?
A D prospect like Engstrom, Bogdan, Trudeau, or Struble?
Harris, Kovacevic, or Savard 50% retained?
Is the Calgary 1st tracking as a lottery pick?
Because it's tracking to be Florida's 1st so far as I can tell.
They'll use their last retention spot to get Bourgault or a 1st. What better would we hope to get with that retention spot?
How are they going to use a retention spot for a 1st at the deadline?Bourgault and Edmonton's 1st are not equal. Edmonton's 1st could be a very high pick. I am sure they would do that. Bourgault is not enough. Bourgeault and a 2nd maybe. They may be able to use their cap space at the deadline for a 1st+.
That makes more sense then a pick close to 30If we make any deal with the Leafs to save their window from closing, I'm asking for Easton Cowan. As I was following Mailloux play last year, I had an opportunity to watch Cowan repeatedly. In my opinion, with his great skating ability and creativity, this kid projects to be a strong NHLer. Cowan should be a lock for Team Canada at the upcoming WJC. The Leafs stole him at 28th OV at the 2023 draft.
Bourgault and Edmonton's 1st are not equal. Edmonton's 1st could be a very high pick. I am sure they would do that. Bourgault is not enough. Bourgeault and a 2nd maybe. They may be able to use their cap space at the deadline for a 1st+.
It just feels like we’re trying to convince ourselves that these Oilers assets are desirable. Why do we want another 6’ winger (weighing less than RHP) ?
Because he’s an asset they’ve put years into.Why would they care about losing Primeau to waivers if they had what they deemed to be a true #1 in Monty? And that’s assuming Primeau even gets claimed at the beginning of the season, I’m not sure that he would have been.
Even if the 1st is protected then it moves to an unprotected 2025 1st which might also be a high draft pick and even if it isn't it's supposed to be a deep draft.How are they going to use a retention spot for a 1st at the deadline?
Edmonton is not trading their 1st unprotected.
I would be interested in Holloway or Bourgault but only at B prospect value.It's sad, but I think that draft picks are the only tradeable assets I'd want Hughes to acquire out if Edmonton.
It's sad, but I think that draft picks are the only tradeable assets I'd want Hughes to acquire out if Edmonton.
Draft picks and maybe someone like Lavoie that can be a good C at the AHL level.
Even if the 1st is protected then it moves to an unprotected 2025 1st which might also be a high draft pick and even if it isn't it's supposed to be a deep draft.
Your right about the retention spot. Other than retaining on Anderson there probably isn't much use for it at the deadline unless they want to reduce Monahan's hit to next to nothing.
I would be interested in Holloway or Bourgault but only at B prospect value.
And What about Campbell's contract?At least Gallagher can still play a bit and his contract is nowhere near the silly Campbell one..Campbell
Foegele
Gallagher
Allen
EDM a real goalie while ditching Campbell and Gally bring a veteran presence in the room/Foegele spot while salary balances without any retention.
MTL solves the menage à trois situation, bury him in the AHL and gets Gally contract out of the way for some kid next 4 years.
Add some picks/prospects to even out and its a clear cut win-win imho
There aren't any good goalies available. Maybe Boston and Nashville have 2. And they should want the equivalent of 2 1sts for one. Holland is probably too gutless to do that. More likely to go for a lesser goalie like Allen + a B prospect for a 1st.Is it just me or is anyone skeptics that Oilers would want any of our 3 backup goalies to add to their 3 backup goalies?
If I’m Oilers I’m trying to get a goalie who can win a cup, not be another backup.
Pearson will get you something.I think we have to accept that Allen, Montembault, Savard, Anderson, Dvo, and Pearson aren't good assets right now. That may change in the 40 or so games that will be played by TDL. But right now, they're not valuable assets on the trade market.
They should be pushing for Saros.Is it just me or is anyone skeptics that Oilers would want any of our 3 backup goalies to add to their 3 backup goalies?
If I’m Oilers I’m trying to get a goalie who can win a cup, not be another backup.
Pearson will get you something.
Savard retained is still a very attractive asset to many teams at the deadline.
Allen and Monty will get you what a goalie gets you, not much.
Dvo and Anderson shouldn't have any value, but you hope that the big brain hockey guys value their intangibles enough to make a foolish offer. I wouldn't expect them to move until they're on the last year of their deals though.
They should be pushing for Saros.
There are none available, and even less that can fit on the Oilers's cap space without sending Campbell the other way which is a very big dissuading factor for any team to trade with the Oilers.Is it just me or is anyone skeptics that Oilers would want any of our 3 backup goalies to add to their 3 backup goalies?
If I’m Oilers I’m trying to get a goalie who can win a cup, not be another backup.
We are already stuck with Gally 6.5m x4 years, I exchange that any day of the week for Campbell 5millonsx4 buried in the minors. Foegele is just as effective until trade deadline and our youngsters will need rosters spot at some point.And What about Campbell's contract?At least Gallagher can still play a bit and his contract is nowhere near the silly Campbell one..
Allen isn't a bad option for them but I think there might be better if they are willing to give up more. For example a Markstrom for Campbell + a 1st could make sense for both Edmonton and Calgary. Oilers get a legit NHL starter, and Calgary gets a jump on their rebuild. Markstrom has a full NMC so who knows if he'd willing to go, but you'd assume yes since Calgary is likely tanking for the next few years. Could be a win a win.Is it just me or is anyone skeptics that Oilers would want any of our 3 backup goalies to add to their 3 backup goalies?
If I’m Oilers I’m trying to get a goalie who can win a cup, not be another backup.
Not sure Markstrom is a legit starter. Fades away when the stakes are high.Allen isn't a bad option for them but I think there might be better if they are willing to give up more. For example a Markstrom for Campbell + a 1st could make sense for both Edmonton and Calgary. Oilers get a legit NHL starter, and Calgary gets a jump on their rebuild. Markstrom has a full NMC so who knows if he'd willing to go, but you'd assume yes since Calgary is likely tanking for the next few years. Could be a win a win.