Garry Valk
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 3,787
- 741
I suspect Laf would thrive here with Suzuki and Caufield. I hope this management team has the guts to try it.
I’d have done Anderson for Laf a year ago. Now? I think we go elsewhere. Not worth the downside.The issue there is the retention. Anderson at 50% is straight up more valuable than Lafreniere. Gambling on potential upside is worth considering, but for all his flaws Anderson is one of a few true power forwards in the league and if Montreal was to make the decision to offer him at 50% (which is incredibly unlikely) for 4 seasons, then his value would be massive.
To be fair to Laf he isn't our 1st overall pick.I just get the sense that Laf would come here and be the new whipping boy. LafatSlaf would become the new term here as both guys would get ripped
It is somewhat but it wont make them bulge. Lafreniere had more points than Anderson. And Anderson doesnt bring much more than tunnel vision speed and leadership.
I would go as cheap as possible for the gamble. Just dont think picks are enough. They need a RW, they have 3 LW and Laf is the 3rd one.
Other thing that could happen is to grad a RW for them in a 3 way.
Grab Boeser than ship them at 50%
Tage Thompson was like Lafreniere a few years ago -- a bust.
I remember him being so good at the WJC, I have to believe there's more in him.I suspect Laf would thrive here with Suzuki and Caufield. I hope this management team has the guts to try it.
The guy never develop since his junior days. Lots of talk about bad work ethics. I'm not sure they gonna sell him for cheap and prefer not to pay too much for a guy like him. If his name was Lafrenov, nobody would care.I remember him being so good at the WJC, I have to believe there's more in him.
The guy never develop since his junior days. Lots of talk about bad work ethics. I'm not sure they gonna sell him for cheap and prefer not to pay too much for a guy like him. If his name was Lafrenov, nobody would care.
Tage Thompson was like Lafreniere a few years ago -- a bust.
OR the city eat him alive like JD.I suspect Laf would thrive here with Suzuki and Caufield. I hope this management team has the guts to try it.
I think Mercer will eventually take Holtz's spot on the top line and force him to play on the 3rd line and he just doesn't play a 3rd line grinder style. He might be work keeping this year for "depth" but it seems like a waste.I mean at that price I would be interested we need another potential top 6. I don’t think jersey would be though. There going for it we’re not
Would the Habs have any interest in Holtz?
It's currently looking like he'll start the season with Hischier and Meier. That means he can't just be good he has to be great in order for him being on that line to be making any sense. Especially when Mercer has already proven he can hang with the big boys and be adaptable and still succeed on the 3rd line.
It feels like he's just a square peg trying to fit into a round hole. His hockey IQ isn't high enough to figure out where Jack hughes wants him to be and he's not a heavy enough forechecker to hang with Hischier.
Habs playstyle seems to fit Holtz more and him being on a Slaf/Dach line where those two do the heavy lifting and the puck is on Holtz stick the least amount of time sounds pretty good to me.
Thoughts on the price would be between the Calgary 2025 1st round pick or montreals 2025 2nd +3rd or 4th.
Same here, but it just doesn’t fit capwise for the Rangers.I would do Anderson for Lafreniere but I'm not retaining any salary on the Donkey.
So was Dach.Tage Thompson was like Lafreniere a few years ago -- a bust.
not really Dach showed promise in the bubble for the Hawks but that big wrist injury slowed him downSo was Dach.
There’s also the expectations factor - Lafreniere was expected to be a game changing 1OA, Tage Thompson was not. Sure Buf wanted to show they received something of equivalent value back in ROR trade but there wasn’t this hockey-wide expectation that he was crowned a game changer.Tage Thompson was like Lafreniere a few years ago -- a bust.
There’s also the expectations factor - Lafreniere was expected to be a game changing 1OA, Tage Thompson was not. Sure Buf wanted to show they received something of equivalent value back in ROR trade but there wasn’t this hockey-wide expectation that he was crowned a game changer.
If expectations were managed, and Lafreniere was looked at from the prism of ceiling being a good player w size & skill that would be another matter IMO…which is how Slaf should also be looked at
He’s “confused” under two coaches now, and he’s dogging it even more frequently. And I’d much rather have Anderson, who is a vastly more valuable player right now and fills a need, than giving up solid assets for magic beans. We’ve finally got rid of the last guy we did that with, no need to take that same road again.We have the habit to overate our players. Anderson is not more than a 3rd liner in any team that want to be serious. Mid to late 1st picks as well.
Lets funnel the age and let them grow together.
Lafreniere is confused, like Caufield was with Ducharme.
Harris + 2ndSo, how much would you trade to acquire another Slaf,?
Harris + 2nd
Slaf is entering yr 2 ELC, Lafreniere is exiting ELC and closer to UFA - market value is predicated on contract status + production - growth trendDidn't know you held Slaf in low regard.