HF Habs: Trade Proposal Thread #84: Off-Season edition

Status
Not open for further replies.

Scriptor

Registered User
Jan 1, 2014
7,897
4,875
'' my dream is to win a cup ''

rumours he wants to join a team that has drafted 1st overall and have potential to draft top 4 again this year and are nowhere close to playoffs.

He says money is not everything then just sign 2m a year for 5 years in Colorado as their second center and farm those cups .

I kinda find this hilarious lol
I find it kind of hilarious that you can't make any leeway for common sense and thus find it kind of hilarious.

What Dubois is saying I that he is willing to make relative concessions in salary demands if it will lead to building a better team and increasing the odds of winning a Cup -- were not talking about Kariya who went to COL for one year at 1.2M in the hopes of winning a Cup.

I.e. Dubois accepts 8.75M for 8 years instead of demanding 9.5M and not signing if he doesn't get the whole thing. The front loaded nature of a contract and the bonus structure possible would make this more possible and attractive as the NET remaining will come closer to 9.5M on a regular contract structure by the end of the deal.

That's where money isn't the end all of agreeing to a contract.

MON has the advantage of signing Dubois as the eldest of the young core and, if they can't win a Cup in 6 years, by the time he is 30, they could help facilitate a trade to a team that is contending for a Cup. It's a win-win as Montreal would then give Dubois' salary to a replacement player turning 24, 25 or 26, maybe the player we draft with our own pick in 2023?

In the meantime, Dubois tries to win with his home town team...
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabzSauce

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,209
36,451
yeah i see what you mean. But isn't only in the cases of offersheets??.


Yeah, as it says the player needs to be on your reserve list at the deadline to extend by 8 years, but I have to imagine if the player is on your team after July 1st you should be good.



Also, the link for anyone who wants to hear Friedman on Marek's show

 
  • Love
Reactions: Benstheman

Benstheman

Registered User
Nov 20, 2014
7,238
3,447
Yeah, as it says the player needs to be on your reserve list at the deadline to extend by 8 years, but I have to imagine if the player is on your team after July 1st you should be good.



Also, the link for anyone who wants to hear Friedman on Marek's show


I wonder if Hughes and Brisson talked contract extension. I mean it's a big part of any deal going forward.

Also probably Habs want to know where they will stand with their two picks before negociating a package with the Jets.
 

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
23,303
14,038
A team can only sign a player to an 8 year contract if they were on their roster at the most recent trade deadline.
But if they trade for PLD this summer, and sign him before the season starts to a long term contract, why would they not be able to add the 8th year if he's under contract? I don't see them not being able to.
 

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,209
36,451
But if they trade for PLD this summer, and sign him before the season starts to a long term contract, why would they not be able to add the 8th year if he's under contract? I don't see them not being able to.
If they (Habs and PLD) want the extra year, they can get Winnipeg to put it in for pretty much a nothing add. Maybe a 5th.

Hf overvalued the sign and trade.

That said, if the Habs acquire him at the draft and wait until after July 1st it's gotta be fine. Or mauve even June 30th. Usually players become ufas on June 30th/ teams lose the ability to sign them 8 years at that time.

July 1st signifies the start of a new season, so if the player is on your reserve list as of July 1st if would logically make sense you could sign them 8 years if eligible
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
21,200
28,127
But if they trade for PLD this summer, and sign him before the season starts to a long term contract, why would they not be able to add the 8th year if he's under contract? I don't see them not being able to.

1679062844516.png
 

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
23,303
14,038
This makes sense but it's not pertinenet. It's seperating the 1 year deal and long term deal. What I'm saying is trade PLD and sign him to an 8 year deal when he's still RFA. Effectively wrapping the 1 year of RFA with the 7 UFA. So once his contract is up on July 1, you sign him to an 8 year extension. That's what I'm wondering can be done or not. If not, as TDC said above, just get Jets to do it for Habs and sign and trade for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ahmedount

Runner77

**********************************************
Sponsor
Jun 24, 2012
85,143
155,724
Jets are also stacked on the left its the last thing they need
In that case, try a set-up trade with another team where players from a position of excess might be a need for that team. Try and obtain assets that would be sought by Winnipeg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nico Cauzuki

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
21,200
28,127
This makes sense but it's not pertinenet. It's seperating the 1 year deal and long term deal. What I'm saying is trade PLD and sign him to an 8 year deal when he's still RFA. Effectively wrapping the 1 year of RFA with the 7 UFA. So once his contract is up on July 1, you sign him to an 8 year extension. That's what I'm wondering can be done or not. If not, as TDC said above, just get Jets to do it for Habs and sign and trade for him.

It says a team can only sign a player to an 8 year contract if they were on their roster at the most recent trade deadline.
It doesn't matter if he's rfa.

The habs are better off signing Dubois to a 7-year contract than 8 years (via Jets). At 32 years old, Dubois might not be worth that money anymore. He plays a physical game, and his body might not be able to keep up anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sterling Archer

Team_Spirit

95% Elliotte
Jul 3, 2002
39,523
21,548
From the main boards;

People joke and say it's alright for 6.5m (Huberdeau 10.5m 8yrs deals starts next season)

Biggest drops in production in NHL history, min 70 games both seasons:

Player1st year2nd year1st points2nd pointsDrop
Jonathan Huberdeau (on pace)2022202311555-60
Bill Barber1976197711255-57
Dennis Maruk1982198313681-55
Bob MacMillan1979198010861-47
Reggie Leach197619779146-45
Chuck Lefley197619778541-44
Phil Esposito1975197612783-44
Sergei Fedorov1996199710763-44
Mats Naslund198919908441-43
Pete Mahovlich1976197710562-43
Vaclav Nedomansky198019817432-42
Wayne Gretzky19911992163121-42
Joe Mullen1989199011069-41
Mike Modano200320048544-41
Andre Boudrias197519767838-40
Brian MacLellan198519868545-40
Bryan Trottier1982198312989-40
Jean Pronovost1976197710464-40

Unless he picks up the pace, Huberdeau is going to have literally the biggest year-over-year decrease in production in NHL history (minimum 70 games both years).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rapala and Runner77

ML16

Registered User
Aug 28, 2020
455
416
Montreal
Do you have any idea of what are the needs of Winnipeg ?

From what I gather, Winnipeg’s needs next season if they trade Dubois and wish to remain competitive before Scheifele, Wheeler and Helleybuyck all hit UFA status in 2024 would be:

- a C replacement for Dubois (unless the Jets opt to use Scheifele/Perfetti at C1/C2, in which case, they’d still need another top-9 forward, likely a C to push Lowry down to C4);
- a G2;
- a RHD.

Interestingly, the Jets have about 8M in cap space to bolster their roster next year. They can live without adding another RHD, but they have to budget at least 1M for a G2, so « only » about 7M available for Dubois (or Dubois’ replacement(s)).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZUKI

Captain Mountain

Formerly Captain Wolverine
Jun 6, 2010
21,130
15,266
From the main boards;

People joke and say it's alright for 6.5m (Huberdeau 10.5m 8yrs deals starts next season)

Man, I remember how many people on here last year were hot at bothered at the idea of signing Huberdeau to a massive contract this offseason.
 

Captain Mountain

Formerly Captain Wolverine
Jun 6, 2010
21,130
15,266
I don't remember anyone wanting to sing him for the contract Winnipeg gave him.

Calgary. He was also going to get a contract around there, if people that he was going sign an 8x7 contract then they weren't being realistic. but the issue was more that the worst team in the NHL signing a veteran to a UFA deal (which are never cheap) until he's in his late 30s was always a terrible idea.

And its not like it wasn't offered as an opinion, I remember the debate:

 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
19,988
18,179
Man, I remember how many people on here last year were hot at bothered at the idea of signing Huberdeau to a massive contract this offseason.
It flat out made me upset how many people were even playing with the idea of signing a long term expensive over 30 contract to a player coming of an unsually high career year like Huberdeau. Some players you just know when it’s a mistake before it happens and for whatever reason even employed GM’s that get paid a ton of money among other staff consistently fall into the same traps.
 

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,586
6,225
From what I gather, Winnipeg’s needs next season if they trade Dubois and wish to remain competitive before Scheifele, Wheeler and Helleybuyck all hit UFA status in 2024 would be:

- a C replacement for Dubois (unless the Jets opt to use Scheifele/Perfetti at C1/C2, in which case, they’d still need another top-9 forward, likely a C to push Lowry down to C4);
- a G2;
- a RHD.

Interestingly, the Jets have about 8M in cap space to bolster their roster next year. They can live without adding another RHD, but they have to budget at least 1M for a G2, so « only » about 7M available for Dubois (or Dubois’ replacement(s)).
They are no doubt also looking to dump Schmidt who has fallen off and would help free up the cap space to make a run at a UFA or pick up a salary

From a cap perspective Schmidt vs Dvorak and Edmundson @ 50% is pretty even. Having that as part of the Dubois deal might make it easier for Winnipeg to accept prospect/picks as the main value piece of the deal since they will have addressed those depth issues and still have the 7-8m to go out and get someone.

But for a crazy never going to happen proposal I would say a 3-way deal with San Jose that roughly looks like
MTL gets PLD
Winnipeg gets Erik Karlsson
SJ gets Florida's 1st, Calgary's 1st, +
 

The Great Weal

Phil's Pizza
Jan 15, 2015
54,900
70,348
We need to dump Armia in the offseason, he can be replaced by a minimum-league player or any of the AHL guys we got on the team. A guy like Pezzetta produces less but is 1000 times more impactful.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad