Don’t want to give up Beck until we know what we have. I do understand that we have to give to get but would rather deal from a position of strength (LD) and try to acquire another first rounder that can be flipped.
Obviously, there is the delicate balance of accommodating what Winnipeg wants. It’ll be a slow dance and it’s impossible to know what will be enough for a deal to happen.
I definitely understand the reticence to include Beck, as I feel it myself, but, precisely because you have to give to get, I reluctantly include him in a trade proposal that I think is more realistic, albeit more difficult to concede.
Unless you are going from our position of strength and giving up Guhle, I don't think it remotely moves the needle for WIN.
I already include Harris in the proposal, to convince WIN after the FLA 1st runner and Beck, but Harris as a main element?
WIN would go, Harris who?
Matheson? Maybe, given how he iOS currently playing.
Hutson cours also be quite enticing, but I wouldn't hand him over to WIN.
Xhekaj, because of the rare blend of player he is? Maybe, but I also wouldn't part with him.
If Matheson + 1st FLA + Dvorak, for example, will cut it, GO! Yo also clear 4.875M for three years in Matheson's case and 4.45M for two years in Dvorak's case - 9.325M in total, plenty to extend Dubois and have some left over for the IR, IMO.