Rebuilding means building. Acquiring ROR would’ve meant the Habs didn’t need to huddle around a trash can fire like hobos and hope to win a reliable centre
Rebuilding is indeed building.
The key piece for Buffalo was Poehling and the Habs blew the player evaluation...... yet again.
In our current situation we have a glut of NHL players who will not factor in be relevant in our future success (if/when it happens). The Jets need present day NHLers and also futures
So there is zero harm in shifting our NHLers and some of our excessive number of picks/prospects away for players/assets that will factor into our future success. It’s as easy and simple as that.
I largely agree. The question is what to give that isn't going to be needed later.
To me the answers include one center not named Suzuki, prospects without the plausible potential to be top 6 F or top 3-4D or starting G, and excess vets that might be useful on the ice but are excess to our rebuild.
By definition this also means NOT including any 1st or 2nd round picks.
So, I'm prepared to offer a package that includes:
A*. Exactly one center - Dach or Dvorak or Evans
B. Any prospect except Slaf, Nesar, Guhle, Barron, Hutson, Farrell, Roy, Dobes
C. Pitlick or Pezzetta, Byron or Drouin
D*. At least one other vet NHL winger except Caufield or Anderson or Dadonov
E. Any NHL D except Edmundson or Matheson i.e. Savard or Wideman
F. Monty or Primeau
G. One 3rd-4th round pick
H. One 5rd round or later pick
Of course not 8 assets but must include* one of A and one of D.
If shopping within these parameters does not work for Winnipeg, they can keep Dubois as a depreciating asset.
My logic is founded upon an evaluation that Dubois is a 2nd line C/LW. If I saw him as a 1C, i would add into the mix of options a first/second round pick or Dadonov or Anderson, and also Farrell, Roy and Allen