Sterling Archer
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2006
- 23,317
- 14,052
Not at all. Though there are several other GMs who wish we won't, as long as he goes to them.Am I the only one that wants to keep Anderson?
Not at all. Though there are several other GMs who wish we won't, as long as he goes to them.
If they want a first, then Evans instead of Dvorak, prospect is fine other than our firsts, Hutson, Harris but Mailloux ok.Would you do Dvorak + FLA 1st (top10 protected) + Sean Farrell + Byron?
That may very well be true, but I feel like that kind of package has more value to the Habs in their rebuilding mode than keeping and playing Anderson.Not me. Anderson has higher value than Toffoli and is more rare to acquire.
I want to trade him because he's valuable right now and I would like to give the playing time to guys like Gallagher and Armia - resurrection projects.Am I the only one that wants to keep Anderson?
Dealing Dvorak instead of Evans works better for the salary cap, though. If the Habs have Suzuki, Dach and PLD, then Dvorak becomes an expensive luxury.If they want a first, then Evans instead of Dvorak, prospect is fine other than our firsts, Hutson, Harris but Mailloux ok.
Armia or Hoffman or Savard in addition to Byron.
It allows either Dach or PLD to play wing. I'd prefer to deal Dvorak or Dach but then no first rounder.Dealing Dvorak instead of Evans works better for the salary cap, though. If the Habs have Suzuki, Dach and PLD, then Dvorak becomes an expensive luxury.
HAve we decided whether we want PLD yet?
No?
Ok I’ll check back in in 40 more pages
We're seeing the same arguments against trading for Dubois that we saw against trading for O'Reilly. O'Reilly is obviously the better player but the philosophy behind those arguments were wrong then and they're wrong now.
HAve we decided whether we want PLD yet?
No?
Ok I’ll check back in in 40 more pages
I agree exact same arguments.
When RoR was traded in 2015 the habs had just gone to conference finals and were a competitive team actively in need of a center.
Right now we’re rebuilding and the team is a field of ruin.
Oh fella, you realize we're talking about when the Sabres dealt O'Reilly, yeah?
If they want a first, then Evans instead of Dvorak, prospect is fine other than our firsts, Hutson, Harris but Mailloux ok.
Armia or Hoffman or Savard in addition to Byron.
Ok so you’ve decided we’re talking about 2018, just as we had finished 3rd last, should have started a rebuild but Bergevin kept going for his improvisation re-tool nonsense that led to the disaster we are in today ?
Good comparison, trading for PLD would probably make as much sense today as trading for RoR or Drouin would have make back then.
That's exactly the kind of philosophy that I'm talking about. It's idiotic. YOU DON'T ACQUIRE GOOD PLAYERS BY ORDER. YOU ACQUIRE THEM WHEN THEY'RE AVAILABLE. We're not talkjng about 37 year-old players here!
Trading Sergachev for Drouin (he was 22!) wouldn't have been a problem if Drouin didn't suck so hard and Bergevin had decimated his roster's defence. Would you actually still go to bat and say that the Habs shouldn't have acquired a winner of the Conn Smythe trophy when he was available so they could lose harder?
The Canadiens almost got 100 points the following year after having traded their star forward and captain!
Well back then RoR was seen as a drunk driving toxic loser yet it’s pretty easy any team should have traded for him in hindsight. Not that he would have won the Smythe as a hab but whatever.
Still he was a risk that made sense for the Blues because they had a solid core with cup aspirations. We don’t. If it’s not PLD we’ll throw 8 millions at some other second liner when our future core is ready it wont be no big loss.
The St.Louis Blues had missed the playoffs the season before acquiring O'Reilly. LOL.
If they want a first, then Evans instead of Dvorak, prospect is fine other than our firsts, Hutson, Harris but Mailloux ok.
Armia or Hoffman or Savard in addition to Byron.
Well they should nitpick for sure, but it shouldn't be things like "we're rebuilding!" it should be discussions about whether management thinks PLD could last in this market with the media pressure, etc.I find the argument against acquiring PLD because we are rebuilding to be funny. Yes, the 60 point centre that turned 24 a few weeks ago is really going to throw things into disarray. The team that hasn’t developed more than one top 6 centre at a time the last 30 years should really nitpick
LOL you are losing it Weeksy, SJ twitter broke it 25 min ago lol:
Well they should nitpick for sure, but it shouldn't be things like "we're rebuilding!" it should be discussions about whether management thinks PLD could last in this market with the media pressure, etc.
Holy shit I wish people would delete Weekes off Twitter.
He posts these huge *BREAKING NEWS* stories with terrible video clips 30 minutes after the ACTUAL TEAM HAS ANNOUNCED THE MOVE. It's insane.
He's the absolute worst.