I only hope that Vancouver is getting Lindholm and then give him a bad contract extension so it messes up negotiations with Petterson.
Nobody will claim him. He's gonna be an expensive 7D for a couple of years then get bought out.Should we waive Holl?
If we are out of the playoff race, Perron, Ghost, and possibly a goalie will be the players for sale. Stevie may very well entertain offers for Sprong and/or Kane too.It's not a matter of if or when it's what moves will Yzerman make? If we make the playoffs then we have cap space to spend, which I have no doubt in my mind he will do something. If we are out of the playoff race then who does he sell? If we are in the playoff picture I can see him trying to make significant adds.
All indications are that he's a rental.
Anyways, trade details:
Lindholm traded to Canucks by Flames for Kuzmenko | NHL.com
Center can become UFA; forward had 21 points for Vancouver, which also sends 1st-round pick, 2 prospects to Calgarywww.nhl.com
I would way rather go for Buch than GuentzelI'd call Dubas and ask the price on Guentzel. Sign him to an extension, 5 years at 8 million and it makes this team instantly a perennial playoff contender. Two top lines of :
Debrincat - Larkin - Kane
Raymond - Compher - Guentzel
Albert Johansson, Berggren or Soderblom, Kasper, 2025 1st
That feels like a bit of an overspend if they aren't looking to re-sign the guy. Guess they had to spend extra to send Kuzmenko the other way.
I think they end up losing to edmonton. Feels like whoever comes out of the east will beat edmonton in the finals this year. Bookmark this if I'm right lolTotal overspend without an extension.... or maybe it's their backup plan to re-sign him if Pettersson asks for too much money and they have to trade him.
Either way, they're all in now. I'm just not convinced that the team is built for the playoffs. If the Canucks get into the Cup finals, it will actually give me some more confidence about the makeup of the Wings roster, so it'll be interesting to watch.
I think they end up losing to edmonton. Feels like whoever comes out of the east will beat edmonton in the finals this year. Bookmark this if I'm right lol
parade has already been planned...The West is a total crapshoot. As Boston demonstrated last season, regular season dominance doesn't mean much in the playoffs.
My guess is that the Wings will beat the team coming out of the West anyways. I'm always right, so plan the parade!
That's the trick with Laughton. He'll never get to play against us if we trade for him. For his career he has .79 points per game against the Wings and a .37 points per game against every other team in the league. Over 10% of his career goals are against us.I wrote it in the trade boards, but thought I'd add it here to ask you guys what you think. By no means do I think this is an even trade (it could be?) but if Yzerman were to go after Scott Laughton (feisty, scrappy guy imo that I would like), would you guys like a deal in the neighborhood of:
Maatta+veleno
for
Laughton
Who adds, what is the add? Just trying to add a space for edvinsson without making a crazy move while getting meaner in the process down the middle. Everytime we have played PHI, I noticed Laughton without trying to look. He either scored, was a part of it, and was always in the thick of the scrums.
edit: Laughton has term left in his deal, so I assume we add more; however, phi is in rebuild mode and taking on two players where one is RFA and the other has one year left that you can flip next year at the deadline if needed. People have also said that he is one of the main reasons their PK is really good this year as well.
I wrote it in the trade boards, but thought I'd add it here to ask you guys what you think. By no means do I think this is an even trade (it could be?) but if Yzerman were to go after Scott Laughton (feisty, scrappy guy imo that I would like), would you guys like a deal in the neighborhood of:
Maatta+veleno
for
Laughton
Who adds, what is the add? Just trying to add a space for edvinsson without making a crazy move while getting meaner in the process down the middle. Everytime we have played PHI, I noticed Laughton without trying to look. He either scored, was a part of it, and was always in the thick of the scrums.
edit: Laughton has term left in his deal, so I assume we add more; however, phi is in rebuild mode and taking on two players where one is RFA and the other has one year left that you can flip next year at the deadline if needed. People have also said that he is one of the main reasons their PK is really good this year as well.
St. Louis offered a 1st and 2nd round picks last year for Laughton and Philly turned it down. Sounds like they wanna keep him unless someone over pay.I wrote it in the trade boards, but thought I'd add it here to ask you guys what you think. By no means do I think this is an even trade (it could be?) but if Yzerman were to go after Scott Laughton (feisty, scrappy guy imo that I would like), would you guys like a deal in the neighborhood of:
Maatta+veleno
for
Laughton
Who adds, what is the add? Just trying to add a space for edvinsson without making a crazy move while getting meaner in the process down the middle. Everytime we have played PHI, I noticed Laughton without trying to look. He either scored, was a part of it, and was always in the thick of the scrums.
edit: Laughton has term left in his deal, so I assume we add more; however, phi is in rebuild mode and taking on two players where one is RFA and the other has one year left that you can flip next year at the deadline if needed. People have also said that he is one of the main reasons their PK is really good this year as well.
Laughton isn't going anywhere
the Flyers reportedly turned down a 1st+2nd for him in the offseason
his points have gone down kind of significantly compared to last year. What was offered last year won't be offered this year.St. Louis offered a 1st and 2nd round picks last year for Laughton and Philly turned it down. Sounds like they wanna keep him unless someone over pay.
This is the exact and only reason we got dbc so what's your point.That's the trick with Laughton. He'll never get to play against us if we trade for him. For his career he has .79 points per game against the Wings and a .37 points per game against every other team in the league. Over 10% of his career goals are against us.
Ahhhh no thank youTo Det:
Rasmus Andersson
To Calgarty:
Det 1st round pick 2024
ASP
Justin Holl
DBC only has 2 more goals against the Wings than Laughton does.This is the exact and only reason we got dbc so what's your point.
Pick a different kid (not Ed).To Det:
Rasmus Andersson
To Calgarty:
Det 1st round pick 2024
ASP
Justin Holl
To get a top line d man that can play even strength against top competition that also plays on the pp and pk. Would be a perfect partner for Edvinsson. ASP might have a bit more offence in him but Andersson is better everywhere else. He makes under 5 mil for the next two years.Ahhhh no thank you
I would certainly hope that Rasmus, at 27yo is better than an 18yo in all-around play.To get a top line d man that can play even strength against top competition that also plays on the pp and pk. Would be a perfect partner for Edvinsson. ASP might have a bit more offence in him but Andersson is better everywhere else. He makes under 5 mil for the next two years.
points man THE POINTSDBC only has 2 more goals against the Wings than Laughton does.