Why would a team trade a pick for Riikola when he was just on waivers and they could have got him for free? I don't think you get anything for the Lafferty's, Jankowski's, Sceviour's either.
I don't want to see Riikola traded anyway. I think the plan in the offseason should be to move Petts or Matheson if one of them isn't taken in the ED. Then give POJ a shot at 3LD and if he doesn't take it, you have Riikola as insurance.
Because if you're a team who wants a bit more depth for your playoff run but won't be keeping it in the big show, grabbing Riikola off of waivers means you then have to send him through yourself and hope another team doesn't grab him, while trading for him once he's been through means you can stow him safely.
I don't think it'd be that hard to find alternate insurance in the off-season either, particularly if its true that Friedman is more comfortable on his left than his right.
Erod has killed offense all year with dumb plays and passes. TB has been so much stronger and has better decision making. I will admit I didn't watch Erod in Buffalo so I dont know what he is like in form. But he is a big downgrade on TB right now.
I don't see a huge difference. Blueger is better at holding onto the puck to keep the play alive which makes a big difference but in terms of pure making plays, Rodrigues is just as capable of spotting and delivering the killing pass - and has set up a bunch of high grade opportunities recently. Blueger will set up more shots, but there's not such a big difference in how many really dangerous plays they make.
I guess if you include puck retention as part of playmaking then, yeah, difference. But I wasn't doing so there.
Why? I believe that even old, vile-smelling dogs with skin disorders deserve a forever home as Good Boys.
I mean, a couple of months of this? Of course I want this.