Martinez was at his best when he was sheltered as a good puck moving dman on the third pairing.
He's been dreadful as his minutes and responsibilities have increased. He is one of the weakest defenders on this team, his play in his own end has been unacceptable. I'd rank Forbort way ahead of Martinez.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is nothing Martinez does to justify his contract.
Martinez was at his best when he was sheltered as a good puck moving dman on the third pairing.
He's been dreadful as his minutes and responsibilities have increased. He is one of the weakest defenders on this team, his play in his own end has been unacceptable. I'd rank Forbort way ahead of Martinez.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but there is nothing Martinez does to justify his contract.
I wonder of Amart will be exposed if he isn't traded.
Would suck to lose him for nothing but it would free cap space if taken.
Ladue not on ice this morning
he makes what a mid pairing defenseman makes. I wouldnt be against trading him because there are younger guys that we can put in his position and the Kings need to shed salary, but to say he's failed to be a top 4 dman on this team is laughably absurd
Why in the world will be expose him? If we simply want cap space, we can trade him for a ton of picks or a combination of prospects and picks.
Why in the world will be expose him? If we simply want cap space, we can trade him for a ton of picks or a combination of prospects and picks.
How is it absurd when he's consistently been one of the worst in the lineup? He can't handle top 4 minutes. Look at his plus minus on this team. He played his best hockey when he was behind Doughty, Muzzin, Voynov and Mitchell.
With two of those four gone and his responsibilities increased, Martinez's play has been putrid. What's laughably absurd about that? The numbers and facts and the eye test all indicate this. He's been awful in his role as a top 4. He's paid like a top 3 but he certainly hasn't played like one.
I don't know what you're seeing in his play that can disprove these statements, but go ahead and try. And please, don't post his game winning goals from 2014 as evidence.
Trade him where? Every team's fan base thinks they will be able to trade away their #4 before the draft. The market will be brutal for D men because most teams have the exact same problem.
The fact that you provide these numbers that show that McNabb has a higher GF% shows how meaningless these stats can be.
Has the team performed better since Martinez has been given more responsibilities? Doesn't appear to me like that's the case. He's in over his head in an elevated role.
Like another poster astutely suggested, Martinez is incapable of carrying a workload. He's a good compliment behind a solid top 4. This season, he is being exposed.
He's also been injury prone throughout his career, is turning 30, and makes too much. This team has to shed contracts, and having two immovable ones in Gaborik and Brown will have to force others out and as a result, Alec Martinez might have to be a casualty of these cost cutting moves.
Muzzin/A-Mart are still strong possession players, it's just every mistake they have made this year seems to end up in the net.
It's really bad year to make mistakes with Quick out.
Muzzin/A-Mart are still strong possession players, it's just every mistake they have made this year seems to end up in the net.
It's really bad year to make mistakes with Quick out.
lol! Asks for proof, uses opinion to slap down proof
Yep. Amongst the best CF% and expected GF% in the league...but were at least for a little bit the literally worst GF% pairing. Might still be with those horrid numbers. And they're clear as day mistakes, just terrible reads off one another. And as Sutter said, you then get caught trying to do too much, to be the hero, which compounds it.
Anybody following this? http://lakingsinsider.com/2017/02/21/february-21-morning-skate-notes-ladue-doesnt-skate-faceoff-art/
Suspicious circumstances around LaDue today. I think a trade is going down....
Possible, since Nolan is unlikely to be activated today.
Or could be illness, or personal issue LaDue doesn't want reported.
Not really. If AMart is an upgrade over an NHL team's current top 6 defense then they can acquire AMart and just expose one of their worst defenseman.
From Jon Rosen
Paul LaDue was not on the ice, nor was he seen in the Kings’ dressing room. Earlier correspondence with hockey operations elicited a “not sure†answer when it was asked if there is anything he’s currently “dealing with,†and Darryl Sutter declined to offer any update. Given this, it’s probably safe to assume he’s not playing tonight. I have another email in and will share additional details should or when I receive them. LaDue logged 17:56 in the 1-0 loss to Anaheim on Sunday – his highest TOI since joining the team – and was on the ice with Peter Budaj pulled, according to the play-by-play log.
Something's gotta be up... we wouldn't send him down seeing as how we would have no spare defenseman...unless there's an illness or personal issue.
I'm not going to deny he played his best hockey on the bottom pairing, but that's hardly a revelation since he's not a bottom-pairing defenseman. That's like finding out Doughty would kill it as a #3.
From 2014-2015 thru 2015-2016:
-GF% 56.94--best amongst all regular d-men except McNabb. +25, behind only Doughty. (24th in league int hat time)
-SCF% 55.69--behind only Muzzin and Greene
-Rel Zone Start Ratio--had the hardest zone starts of anyone not named Regehr, -7.83. (49.77 ZSR), while having a Zone FINISH ratio of 51 (most other d-men go negative). So despite starting more shifts in the D-zone, he finished a higher proportion in the Ozone by a higher percentage than anyone (only Drew and Muzzin were positive amongst regulars IIRC and by a much smaller margin probably affected by their starts). This illustrates his play-driving strength (and you saw this on the Cup winning go...oh, you don't want to mention that )
-PPG--0.4, behind only Doughty and Muzzin
1:58 per game SH AND PP
If that's not an all situations 2nd pairing d-man, you have lofty expectations, my friend. If you want to compare him to another 2nd pairing d-man around the league, I'm happy to use that as an illustration, as well.
We were spoiled having him as a secret weapon on the bottom pairing, no doubt. And he's obviously having an off season. Doesn't make him a bad top-4 guy. He's a dynamic d-man who can skate the puck with the best of them.