people mad at hughes for keeping Armia, Dvorak and co, what are the realistic expectations on the return? A couple middling picks? Anyone who thinks were getting back anything to help us out is delusional. Our biggest trade chip was resigned, and we clearly lack the pieces required to pick up a Cozens or similar impact player.
You don't need players back to make an impact. You need those assets acquired to trade to make an impact.
Dvorak, Armia and Savard now have 0 value.
That 2nd round pick you get for trading Armia now allows you to trade up, or you have it to take a gamble on a player like Kakko at a much more reasonable price than what you paid for Newhook, or Dach.
You have an extra 2nd so you can overpay to land a good player who's available.
What's the point of bringing Armia, Savard, or Dvorak back ? So you can take another run to be just outside the playoffs?
Furthermore, you could have used those assets attained and made a hockey trade so you're rewarding your team AND building for the future.
Kent Hughes didn't make a trade because he didn't want the team to be upset.
Now, I'll give him keeping Dvorak who wins faceoffs and does pretty much nothing else you couldn't easily find and given his contract even at 50% retained he's still not worth much, but the others would have returned a 2nd each, which is more than fine for a return.
Given that it's Winnipeg who supposedly had the most interest and went out and acquired similar players, the Habs could have asked for 2nds in 2026, 2027 and got a roster player luke Kupari, or Stanley back so they wouldn't be hindering Laval.
If Winnipeg was only offering a 3rd and Heinola for both then ok, keep them, but given the prices being paid that wasn't happening.
It's not a huge disappointment, but it's just another smaller disappointment that's starting to build up. No one is going to be great, but he's trending more towards mistakes than good plays.