We did have someone as regularly injured as Norris, tho.We didn’t had a Josh Norris to trade for
Hence contingency plans
Contingency for what? You're stuck until the Rantanen trade goes through, you can't load up on the side because if the main trade fail, you're f***.
Which one?Because there is more than oneWe did have someone as regularly injured as Norris, tho.![]()
Half of your post isn't even about the team, but i'm the one who's mad. Oh the projectionWell, for one, I did say IF Rainmaker replaces Matheson, and IF Laine is not seen as a good fit. You can ignore conditions all you want, but you're still ommiting them.
You're also precluding Habs will make the playoffs when they could easily have an off-year with too many injuries, but yeah go ahead and reduce away if it can raise your ire. Maybe go buy a punching bag?
Not expecting them to make the playoffs as their schedule is not easy.
But I do expect them to stay in the battle for a spot for at least the next two weeks.
I do not care where they finish for a draft choice because I maintain they won’t draft in the first round this summer; they will trade both picks. Tis the summer to rumble.
Arguably even worse. Marc Bergevin was saying how there are no deals to be made. Tulsky acknowledged how there were deals to be made, but he didn't plan proper time management for it.Some Marc Bergevin excuse nice![]()
A guy that has a subscription toSo now that Kent acknowledges we need a 2C in public, what does that make Dach?
A winger? Tradebait?
It was stupid. Should have just kept Rantanen if the other trades he was looking at were gone by the time a contract was reached. And should have given a deadline for Dallas to sign him,That's a pretty brutal self own...
If I'm the owner of that team, I'm not keeping that guy employed long
It's Hughes who didn't want to sell him. Brandon Tanev got a 2nd round pick.I thought armia was for sure gone to the west - teams gonna regret not picking this dude up.
? contingency planning means you have plans in place for a number of possible scenarios, so that you can act quickly and decisively as the environment changes.
IF...Then
For as many scenarios as required to be confident you can avoid the worst case scenario.
Half of your post isn't even about the team, but i'm the one who's mad. Oh the projection. Maybe you should go and cool off.
good question - he did mention he played well on suzuki's wing.So now that Kent acknowledges we need a 2C in public, what does that make Dach?
A winger? Tradebait?
A liability.So now that Kent acknowledges we need a 2C in public, what does that make Dach?
A winger? Tradebait?
Please tell me how it's obvious when he said that PRIOR to the 4-nations they were talking of selling, and after those 5 games they decided not to? Frankly, we are almonst saying the same thing. You keep saying how he is consistent, I'm just saying that those 5-game stretch aren't enough to decide which way to go. Boston is 2 points down for us. But they are 2-6-2 in the last 10 games. So...they decide to sell. I mean....I guess Boston did go the direction they went ALSO based on a few games too? It happens? Whether I agree or not...it's just a matter of opinion. But isn't it also obivious that while Hughes did decide to stay put because of the last stretch, that Boston did decide to go the other way for the same reason?The effort they are being "rewarded" for, isn't the 5-game post 4 nation's effort, it's the whole season. That's pretty obvious, no?
A rookie gm’s huge mistakeSo now that Kent acknowledges we need a 2C in public, what does that make Dach?
A winger? Tradebait?
So now that Kent acknowledges we need a 2C in public, what does that make Dach?
A winger? Tradebait?