Again, all logical thoughts.
I now it is also more team specific So it isn’t always clear because what one team needs may not match what the perceived top players provide.
I don’t want to get into a discussion on this point but I would suggest Mintyukov was more impactful than DelMaestro and Morrison was a better centre at the OHL level and carried an OHL MVP from the previous season, so from my perspective, I think the 67’s acquired the best two player punch. Although, if we were to stretch it out longer, Othman, Beck and the combination of Hayes and White were the overall most impactful moves and I guess that was proven with their Championship win. I only point this out because I am trying to frame the argument that the Sting didn’t acquire the best players. Maybe the best players for them, but if we use the best players for them argument, that means they needed specific players as opposed to jsut outright snagging the best to put them over the top. They needed those two players to give them a Chance. The claim I am making is if you are going to trade a player like Martone, you have to be the clear leader prior to the trade. You are making that deal to seal the deal, not position yourself better. I think that is the clear distinction I am trying to make when I criticize the trade.
Martone is one of the most impactful players in the OHL right now as a 17 year old. Of course most knew he would likely be that player but many said the same about JVV and JVV is not on the same plane right now. I would accept the argument that you never know what the player would turn out to be but you know exactly what DelBel and DelMaestro were. I can also accept the argument that if that wasn’t the right time for the sting, what was the right time for that franchise? I can get behind the reasons why they did it. I feel like a more disciplined GM wouldn’t have done it, nor should they have done it.