-It doesn't matter where teams draft someone. All it takes is one scouting dept to like a player for them to reach for him. Overall consensus was not for RB at 5. McKenzie's list, which is consolidated, had him at 8, and he rose there throughout the year. I personally would have been ok with him at 8, but at 5, there were better options.
And Eiserman’s on some lists at 2 and others at 14.
Two other clubs wanted him at 5th. And even if you’re saying 8th that’s a few picks away, hardly a reach.
-We might eke out some stars (small s), but I don't think anyone is a dominant gamebreaker. A McDavid, a Pastrnak, a Kopitar, a Kucherov, a Hedman, a Kane, a Draisaitl, a Chara. We don't have that up front or on D.
Again, Hutson just smashed the NCAA record for points. How in the world can we not see at least star potential there?
You’re talking about guys not even in the league yet or just starting their careers. Moreover, we have a pretty high volume of really good prospects, we have another high pick this year - we might wind up with multiple stars.
Do you think the Bruins knew they had a star in Pasternak? No they didn’t. He emerged over time. It’s the same with say… Slaf. We don’t really know what he’ll be yet.
Players who can singlehandedly take over and win you games. You NEED that. Cup winners almost ALWAYS have that. Do you really see any of our guys being that dominant? Do you see Suzuki being Kopitar? Do you see Reinbacher, who's having a terrible D+1 and was never that offensively gifted, being Doughty? Slaf might (MIGHT) become a Rantanen, but who's his Mackinnon?
The New Jersey Devils didn’t have a Mackinnon, neither did the Bruins… we don’t need a Mackinnon if we’ve got stars elsewhere.
There’s no way to know if the stars are here yet. But I reject your assertion that we don’t have star potential- we certainly do. But we have have to wait and see.
-I don't follow the posting career of everyone on here. Every time we get a new management, people generally go full cheerleader for a while and then ignore warning signs, wanting to hope for the best. This org under Gorton and Hughes seems more competent than previous regimes in general, but I think they're making mistakes and I think there are warning signs, such as nepotism, old boys club hires, not dealing with the medical evaluation problems more quickly, not properly tanking, prioritizing culture over talent (the Bergevin special), playing injured players instead of sitting them in lost seasons, etc.
Then don’t bring up cheerleading accusations if you don’t know who you’re talking to.
I argued for years we should rebuild. The way to do that is to stockpile talent. And the team has ‘tanked’ exactly as they should. We have two top fives in two drafts plus another top ten (in a top heavy) draft this year. We’ve also traded away vets and stockpiled picks and prospects. We’re doing exactly what I’d hoped we’d do.
I don't want baseline competence. I want THE BEST.
-There are plenty of teams with volumes of young talent. The Atlantic is going to be murderer's row for a while. Buckle up.
The only way to get the BEST is the lottery. You can’t count on that. What you can do is draft high for a few years and stockpile the best talent you can. That’s the way it’s always been done.
Btw, it’s entirely possible that we got the two best players in the 2022 draft. That draft might be one of the best we’ve ever had.
-I don't think we're in good shape yet. If we draft a really, REALLY good forward this year, I think we might save things. If we continue to f*** up and draft 8th or something, I don't think things will go well.
It’s been TWO years…
It’s not like we’re in the middle of a rebuild, we’re at the start. We won’t be in the playoffs next year either btw. We’ll have tons of young blueliners to use as currency… And we won’t see guys like RB and Hutson probably until 25-26.