I'm skeptical of both, because a riser could indicate hot streaks that aren't sustainable, while fallers are as you said.
I like consistency in prospects. I find that's something that translates well in the rest of their careers.
I'm aware of what's happened regarding D in previous drafts. But what's happened has no bearing on Reinbacher's talent or where he should have gone. David Savard is a big righty that eats minutes. Doesn't mean he should go top 5 in a draft.
Strange comparison with Savard who was never a top pairing dman and simply who never had this potential. Much respect for his career but he always was a second pairing, pk specialist at best.
Reinbacher upside is a stratosphere away from it. (Not a guarantee he reaches it but he has ainec top 1-2D upside.)
To put things into perspective,
Do you think Toronto would trade a 26YO Marner for a 34YO Pietrangelo? A piece they critically miss and can't simply find nor trade for.
If you answer yes to this question, which i think is a yes, it should put into perspective how Reinbacher(Pietrangelo) is not a reach relative to Michkov(Marner).
I know Marner and Pietrangelo are players that reached their upside and they are stylistically different but i use this as a comparison to highlights the importance and scarcity of this type of dman, therefore reinforcing my argument/opinion that Reinbacher was not a reach at 5.
I'm skeptical of both, because a riser could indicate hot streaks that aren't sustainable, while fallers are as you said.
I like consistency in prospects. I find that's something that translates well in the rest of their careers.
I'm aware of what's happened regarding D in previous drafts. But what's happened has no bearing on Reinbacher's talent or where he should have gone. David Savard is a big righty that eats minutes. Doesn't mean he should go top 5 in a draft.
Strange comparison with Savard who was never a top pairing dman and simply who never had this potential. Much respect for his career but he always was a second pairing, pk specialist at best.
Reinbacher upside is a stratosphere away from it. (Not a guarantee he reaches it but he has ainec top 1-2D upside.)
To put things into perspective,
Do you think Toronto would trade a 26YO Marner for a 34YO Pietrangelo? A piece they critically miss and can't simply find nor trade for.
If you answer yes to this question, which i think is a yes, it should put into perspective how Reinbacher(Pietrangelo) is not a reach relative to Michkov(Marner).
I know Marner and Pietrangelo are players that reached their upside and they are stylistically different but i use this as a comparison to highlights the importance and scarcity of this type of dman, therefore reinforcing my argument/opinion that Reinbacher was not a reach at 5.