ULF_55
Moderator
No chance,he probably would prefer to go to a team who can get passed
the first round.![]()
Sounds like he wouldn't be a fit anyway.
Leafs are looking for a difference maker, not another passenger.
No chance,he probably would prefer to go to a team who can get passed
the first round.![]()
Lol... well then
Yeah or maybe he’s had some not favorable conversations with other GM’s and is a little frustrated.Thats a pretty direct answer. Don't really see that from Dubas. It'a almost like an anger response directed at Sandin.
I think he's just done messing around with the media. Plenty of great RFA's out there but ours are the only ones that usually seem to come up in offer sheet talk to drive up the price.Thats a pretty direct answer. Don't really see that from Dubas. It'a almost like an anger response directed at Sandin.
Hoping it happens tomorrow for some picks.I feel the Holl trade (when it happens) is going to be for an AHL player. Similar to Johnsson for Anderson a few years back. A cap dump
I think he's just done messing around with the media. Plenty of great RFA's out there but ours are the only ones that usually seem to come up in offer sheet talk to drive up the price.
Why not Tkachuk? why not Laine? etc..
Dubas has clearly set his price on a contract, Sandin has no leverage, take the deal or wait for this magical offersheet to come.
I'd rather we proactively move him than wait for an offersheet. I'd be fine with someone like Veleno or Poolparty coming back.
Don't know about you but I thought the debate on whether we lost McCann or Hollander and a 7th to Seattle was pretty interesting.![]()
I feel the Holl trade (when it happens) is going to be for an AHL player. Similar to Johnsson for Anderson a few years back. A cap dump
Just take the 2nd. round pick and move on.
Someone else can reap the benefit of the Leafs development.
Maybe Detroit?
Of course not. Why in the world would we do that?So would you do Tavares to Ottawa or Buffalo with 50% retention?
So would you do Tavares to Ottawa or Buffalo with 50% retention?
Of course not. Why in the world would we do that?
If they gave significant assets back, sure.