mapleleafs34
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2011
- 1,129
- 1,373
1. I disagree on every trade being a loss. As a rule of thumb for me if a trade is unanimously loved on the Leafs board it's probably a trade the opposing team wouldn't accept.
2. Hill outperformed Campbell in GSAx last year and has outperformed Campbell in GSAx/60 since Campbell's been a Leaf. Wedgewood also outperformed Campbell last year and throughout his entire Leafs tenure.
Sure. Sounds like we're both in agreement that they aren't in a rush to shed Varlamov's cap hit.
I suppose I value Kerfoot, who is also an impending UFA, less than you do. I personally think Hill is a good bet based on his underlying numbers and San Jose has incentive to move him due to their goalie situation. Campbell's career high in games was 31 before this season.
Who do you think is a realistic option in goal for the Leafs next year?
I don't see Kerfoot getting above a 3rd round pick in trade. We'll see what happens with him.A 50 point versatile position forward who is owed 750k in real dollars after his signing bonus is paid? With teams struggling financially, that nearly 3 mill difference in pay Vs cap is definitely valuable for a productive player.
I think if the leafs gamble on goaltending, they target Blackwood. Young, big athletic goalie, who has some history of productivity in a starters role on a weak team and has RFA control after expiry. Support him with a 1 year deal on a reliable starter like MAF.
If Kapanen got a mid 1st and a B level prospect (at the time), Kerfoot will definitely get more than just a 3rd…I don't see Kerfoot getting above a 3rd round pick in trade. We'll see what happens with him.
Hill is 7 months older than Blackwood, he's bigger and cheaper. Blackwood is a fine target but he's actually been bad the last 2 years. Hill has outperformed him each of the last 2 years in GSAx and was almost identical in GSAx/60 in 2019-20. I do like that he's RFA on expiration though.
I also like Fleury but don't see him coming here. I'd gladly be wrong. The other established starters on the market are Kuemper and maybe Husso. I'd imagine Fleury stays in MIN, Kuemper in COL and Husso to EDM. Campbell is obviously still an option but his reported salary demands are now exceeding 6M which is ridiculous.
I think they have much differing value. Kapanen had perceived upside - he was traded at 24 and had a 20 goal season under his belt. He was/is seen as one of the fastest skaters in the NHL. He had 2 years remaining at 3.2M and RFA on expiration - so a minimum of 3 years of control whereas Kerfoot has 1.If Kapanen got a mid 1st and a B level prospect (at the time), Kerfoot will definitely get more than just a 3rd…
Some of these goaltending suggestions are horrifying. I hope there's an actual plan beyond hasbeens and reclamation projects.
Valeri Nichushkin - 5 years @ 5 million per
To Toronto: Boris Katchouk
To Chicago: Petr Mrazek + Nicholas Abruzzese
I think Dubas will need to go big, but there definitely isn’t many options. Varlamov seems like the best option out there that won’t break the bank and we’d potentially be able to get the Islanders to retain a bit of his salary. By the sounds of it, Campbell is heading to Jersey and Husso to Edmonton.There aren’t many feasible options out there. Hoping for a pie in the sky big fish is bound to lead to disappointment
If Kapanen got a mid 1st and a B level prospect (at the time), Kerfoot will definitely get more than just a 3rd…
There aren’t many feasible options out there. Hoping for a pie in the sky big fish is bound to lead to disappointment
Why does Nichushkin take a discount over his projected market rate (6.3M) to come to Toronto? Colorado could easily re-sign him at 6.3M.
I don't see why Chicago downgrades from Katchouk to Abruzzese and takes on Mrazek.
I think Duclair is a good trade and stash candidate.
Florida has some good rookies on the roster so they might not want to use LTIR.
DeSmith would be a fine option and won't cost 5M. He's projected to get 2.7M on EvolvingHockey. He was arrested in college for assaulting his girl friend (link). I can't find any evidence of him being charged but the Leafs usually stay away from this stuff.If Leafs are going to $5mm * 4-5 years then I think there are options, including Campbell.
DeSmith, Husso, Campbell.
If they're willing to risk it for players who look to have fallen off, but some are blaming the team, like Gibson, why not go after cheaper versions of the same excuse, example Martin Jones.
If you give an excuse for player X, you really should give them same excuse to player Y when their situation is similar. "He'd be good if he was on a good team." Flyers
And if one hope and prayer is costing 6.5 for 5 years , and the other 2.5 which hope and prayer for 2 years...
Cough *Marchment* cough......One year wonders shouldn't be landing long term deals based on that one year, their career should be a consideration.
Nichushkin has never scored like this before.
Valeri Nichushkin Hockey Stats and Profile at hockeydb.com
Statistics of Valeri Nichushkin, a hockey player from Chelyabinsk, Russia born Mar 4 1995 who was active from 2011 to 2024.www.hockeydb.com
One year late bloomers in contract years are huge risks.
Love him on the Leafs, but not sure who he is (is he a 10-15 goal guy or the 25 goal guy).
Wanted him for years.
We'll revisit this in 3 weeks.One year wonders shouldn't be landing long term deals based on that one year, their career should be a consideration.
I don't think I would take Fleury on anything much higher than league min, and wouldn't pencil him as anything higher than a backup (until if/when he can win a larger role)Blackwood & Fleury would be the most ideal goaltending duo IMO
We'll revisit this in 3 weeks.
Blackwood & Fleury would be the most ideal goaltending duo IMO
I'm not claiming he'll be worth it. I'm claiming that Nuke will get a big contract.Actually, the re-visit should be at the end of his contract, not the beginning.