Yeah, the difference between 7th and 16th is like a late 1st. So the sweetener better be pretty good.You're aware OTT/BUF talked Murray retained and 7th overall for 16th right?
I think mental toughness and a bit of defensive attention to details are the only thing stopping the leafs from being a high level contender in the playoffsIt takes a bit more than just experience and mental toughness to be a good playoff goalie. He was great earlier in his career when he was also a great goalie, but has fallen off a cliff in the playoffs since then. He's also very injury prone and unreliable
I think the sweetener needs to be at least as good as whatever we had to give up to move Mrazek. If it is, I am good with going from Mrazek to Murray.
Murray, like Gibson, is looking to return to form from 3 years ago. Gibson does not have the injury trouble and has carried a starter's workload, but he also costs huge assets, will come with a huge contract (both in term and dollars), and does not have anywhere near the kind of playoff success that Murray has had.
I don't think the idea is that Murray is our headliner, but rather as a part of a tandem with another reliable, but perhaps not "sexy", option. As I said yesterday, Dubas has probably seen what Campbell is asking for and it is simply too much for what he brings to the table. Kuemper is also likely looking at a ridiculous deal. And he has probably already sniffed around the trade market and the prices are either ridiculous or the guy doesn't want to come here. There simply is not much out there unless you want to go for a massive home run swing which is more likely to close our window than put us over the top. Murray is a massive home run swing which does not close our window if it doesn't connect, but may be less likely to be a home run than perhaps a Kuemper would be.
I don't "love" it, but I don't "love" any realistic option we likely have right now and I probably like this more than anything we can do outside of getting Varlamov.
I don't know if a deal can be done without retention.....unless you traded Kerfoot and Holl but got back top prospects and picks on top of Murray.
I really think that Kerfoot would hold a ton of value to Ottawa with his cap hit of $3.5 M but a $750k salary.
I think mental toughness and a bit of defensive attention to details are the only thing stopping the leafs from being a high level contender in the playoffs
Reimer, Andersen, Campbell all have been questioned on their mental toughness in the playoffs
Not saying Murray would be my target but at 3.2M + 2nd + maybe another mid pick for not much else he's not the worse big ticket bet to make
Think he's likelier to win a round and go deep for us then Blackwood or Talbot
Depends on price again. 50% retention and a very solid sweetener leaves the Leafs in decent shape. Just have to trade Kerfoot for futures (let's say) and they would be back up to over $10.5 million in cap space, or roughly where they are now with at least someone in net.Pure futures like a 1st round draft pick (reverse Marleau) would also work. But I think we live to regret bringing on Murray one way or another.
Depends on price again. 50% retention and a very solid sweetener leaves the Leafs in decent shape. Just have to trade Kerfoot for futures (let's say) and they would be back up to over $10.5 million in cap space, or roughly where they are now with at least someone in net.
LMAO why did he single out the Leafs. Did anyone even connect Gibson to the Leafs other than fans?
I'd almost want him double retained at 50% and have a 3rd team in there if we're taking a shot at Murray.Depends on price again. 50% retention and a very solid sweetener leaves the Leafs in decent shape. Just have to trade Kerfoot for futures (let's say) and they would be back up to over $10.5 million in cap space, or roughly where they are now with at least someone in net.
You're positive about this but as a Dubas fan, this is pushing me to the other side. I'll see what the deal is firstI'm ok with Murray at 50% as a 1B, but we'd obviously need to add someone more reliable as a 1A. A Talbot or a Varlamov.
I'd almost want him double retained at 50% and have a 3rd team in there if we're taking a shot at Murray.
There is no reason to believe he'd be any better than Mrazek was at thos point.
Murray (50%) + Formenton I wouldn’t be too upset wirh
Or let him be bought out and bring him to camp as a tryout.
There has to be another goalie in play or plan. Feels like It would be terrible to just run with Murray.Even an asset back with Murray doesn’t do a ton for me. Unless they have another goalie plan
I am hoping it has assets or something because that would be...very insane if not.I am in disbelief Dubas thinks Murray is any kind of an answer. It beter be 50% with a good asset attached and even than questionable.