jaric1862
Registered User
- Jan 14, 2014
- 4,307
- 2,080
Yeah and Jack Campbell has a .937 save percentage. I don't know what to tell you if you think that's sustainable.
It's one of the best dcorps in the league, yes.
Yeah and Jack Campbell has a .937 save percentage. I don't know what to tell you if you think that's sustainable.
It's a good regular season d core. It's not going to win you a championship.
Cool! They also have the third best team save percentage in the league.
The point is that defence is the thinnest position on the roster. The Leafs are in a very tough spot if one of Rielly, Muzzin, or Brodie go down, as they don't really have any other guys at that position who can play top 4 minutes against tough competition. We've seen this the last two playoffs when Muzzin went down.
Our other goalies have combined for an .891 SV% as well. I doubt that is sustainable with the defense we have had either..Yeah and Jack Campbell has a .937 save percentage. I don't know what to tell you if you think that's sustainable.
You can attach all the advanced stats you want Zeke. How were MTL’s advanced stats? They still made it to the finals. Advanced stats are only one part of it. The other part is what players and analysts who have actually participated in the Stanley Cup finals have said is important and contributed to their win. That is grit, that is intensity, that is a commitment to playing as tight as possible every night and winning battles. Advanced stats are important in building a team but as we know they actually mean f*** all when it comes to winning a championship. Anyone who’s won a Stanley cup will tell you that straight up.
EDIT: also you keep pointing to our defensive numbers yet we haven’t won shit. So the numbers mean absolutely nothing to me lol. Also with context, we know that scoring goes down in the playoffs. So naturally our GA would go down.
Our defense has been great in the playoffs, by normal stats or advanced stats. I don't know what to tell you.
Hate to be pedantic, but we didn't actually make the playoffs 2 years ago. Also with the small sample size nature of this, you do have to take the opponent into consideration, and neither Habs nor CBJ were high-scoring teams. Not to mention that they adapted an extra defensive style to counter our firepower.
Zeke when are you going to realize that advanced stats mean nothing if it doesn’t translate to wins? It’s def one part of the puzzle. Im not denying that. But another part is actually being able to do things on the ice that advance stats doesn’t show. That is why despite us having good advanced stats we do not win. It’s the little battles we lose in front of the net, it’s not giving our goalies clean looks at in coming shots. It’s not forechecking hard, it’s losing puck battles on the boards and turning over the puck. Those things don’t show up on your fancy stats.
again, I showed you goals against.
those aren't fancy stats.
and what about goals against? We still lost
we didn't lose because of defense.
what did we lose because of then?
They are essentially getting the same salary in three players as they are paying for Chychryn I think this is absolutely something they would wantAren't the Yotes a budget team rebuilding and thinking about the future? I don't see players like Holl, Ritchie & Dermott (or players of that ilk) being attractive to a budget team that's rebuilding. Makes sense for the Leafs as they unload salary, but not so much for the them.
Muzzin is the current 2nd pairing LHD behind Rielly, Sandin is the 3rd pairing LHD, who should replace Muzzin on pairing #2 when Muzzin moves on and he looks primed to do it. I don't think there is a short term or long term concern for the 2nd pairing on the left side and having both Muzzin and Sandin provides depth right now.
I think getting Chychrun means they lose Sandin in trade to Arizona and Muzzin in trade to make financial room for Chychrun. They would also be hard pressed to get good assets back with them needing to shed that contract after bringing in Chychrun. They would also need to add significantly to Sandin and would lose other prime trade chips, that could be used on an area of weakness, not an area of strength.
They are essentially getting the same salary in three players as they are paying for Chychryn I think this is absolutely something they would want
For starters, our high end forwards couldn't create offense.what did we lose because of then?
I imagine they would want good players though.They are essentially getting the same salary in three players as they are paying for Chychryn I think this is absolutely something they would want
That wasn't the entire deal he didn't quote the entire deal the deal also included Robertson Niemela and a 1stHoll, Ritchie & Dermott for Chychrun is about as likely to happen as me winning the lottery. Actually I like my odds better.