Speculation: Trade and Free Agency Talk - 2022-23 Edition - Postseason Success can't be a Myth!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Obvious Fabertism

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2009
6,696
4,058
MN
It was also ELC and full career of Leddy vs a Burns at full UFA age and price. Burns obviously the superior offensive player but dollar value per year has to skew Leddy. Fully punting a first round pick 6 months after picking him and watching him have a wildly successful career is devastating.
 

ThatGuy22

Registered User
Oct 11, 2011
10,750
4,422
Burns was just at a different level, if you take away his best 5 seasons he is still kind of better than Leddy.

That trade is kind of ugly now but Burns didn't really blow up until 4-5 years after moving out west, just a late late bloomer.
Burns doesn't become Burns in MN.

It was that year playing Wing with Thornton that caused his offense to explode, and that confidence translated when he went back to D.
 

thestonedkoala

Going Dark
Aug 27, 2004
28,654
1,712
The Leddy + Johansson trade made sense if they believed Barker could bounce back, because Fletcher was under the gun to get the team back to the playoffs. He didn't take into account that the NHL style changed and Barker was a terrible defensemen.

Michalek for Westrum and Wood was horrendous.
 

Digitalbooya

By order of the Peaky Blinders
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2010
28,148
8,017
Wisconsin
The part that gets me is if you draw modern day comparables here is what I see:

Burns: Fiala for 1st+Faber (+roster forward)

Barker: Dumba+Lambos for nothing

Plus, wasn’t the Burns trade basically a choice between keeping him or keeping Koivu? Think of all the “Koivu isn’t a 1C” and “is Koivu a good captain” conversations we would have missed out on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victorious Secret

thestonedkoala

Going Dark
Aug 27, 2004
28,654
1,712
The part that gets me is if you draw modern day comparables here is what I see:

Burns: Fiala for 1st+Faber (+roster forward)

Barker: Dumba+Lambos for nothing

Plus, wasn’t the Burns trade basically a choice between keeping him or keeping Koivu? Think of all the “Koivu isn’t a 1C” and “is Koivu a good captain” conversations we would have missed out on.

Burns mentioned that the Wild never talked to him about an extension. The trade was a bit of a surprise.

I'd say the Barker trade is more like Goligoski + Lambos
 
  • Like
Reactions: Digitalbooya

DANOZ28

Registered User
May 22, 2012
7,110
475
nearest bar MN
The Leddy + Johansson trade made sense if they believed Barker could bounce back, because Fletcher was under the gun to get the team back to the playoffs. He didn't take into account that the NHL style changed and Barker was a terrible defensemen.

Michalek for Westrum and Wood was horrendous.
its the gms job to get fair value or win a trade. ps burns was rumored to want alot of money the wild didn't have at the time.
 

thestonedkoala

Going Dark
Aug 27, 2004
28,654
1,712
its the gms job to get fair value or win a trade. ps burns was rumored to want alot of money the wild didn't have at the time.
It's the GM's job to improve their team. Fletcher was hired to get the team to the playoffs and if that means giving up a potential prospect for a now player, you do that. Leddy could have been a massive bust. He was an unknown quantity. Barker was a known quantity. They banked on it wrong, but the philosophy was sound.

Never heard that rumor; only heard Burns was willing to take less to say with the team.
 

Al Lagoon

Registered User
Feb 22, 2012
3,553
712
Burns was also drafted as a wing, recently converted from dman, and then flipped and flopped throughout his career in Minnesota, and also in SJ. Special case Burns is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thestonedkoala

thestonedkoala

Going Dark
Aug 27, 2004
28,654
1,712
Burns trade was salvageable if we took the right guy at #28.

Didn't have that same chance with the Leddy one.
Burns was a knee jerk reaction by Fletcher. The return was decent if Setoguchi had continued to be a 20-30 goal scorers or if Coyle would have developed into a power forward.
 

TaLoN

Red 5 standing by
Sponsor
May 30, 2010
51,422
25,218
Farmington, MN
Burns was a knee jerk reaction by Fletcher. The return was decent if Setoguchi had continued to be a 20-30 goal scorers or if Coyle would have developed into a power forward.
The team couldn't afford both Koivu and Burns because of the cap committed by Risebrough to Backstrom.

It wasn't knee jerk, it was reality. They had to choose, they chose the center.

Further cap maneuvering got us both Parise and Suter, which was pretty savvy maneuvering actually.
 
Last edited:

thestonedkoala

Going Dark
Aug 27, 2004
28,654
1,712
The team couldn't afford both Koivu and Burns because of the cap committed by Risebrough to Backstrom.

It wasn't knee jerk, it was reality. They had to choose, they chose the center.

Further cap maneuvering got us both Parise and Suter, which was pretty savvy maneuvering actually.

Backstrom's contract was a problem, but it was a known problem when Fletcher was hired as GM. He was also coming off a pretty good season, but Backstrom's contract coupled with Koivu's contract really doomed Minnesota on signing back Burns. However, Minnesota didn't even really approach Burns to get his numbers. I say it was a knee jerk reaction, because Minnesota didn't even try to talk to Burns and see what his numbers were at.
 

Minnewildsota

He who laughs last thinks slowest
Jun 7, 2010
8,889
3,092
Backstrom's contract was a problem, but it was a known problem when Fletcher was hired as GM. He was also coming off a pretty good season, but Backstrom's contract coupled with Koivu's contract really doomed Minnesota on signing back Burns. However, Minnesota didn't even really approach Burns to get his numbers. I say it was a knee jerk reaction, because Minnesota didn't even try to talk to Burns and see what his numbers were at.
That's not what knee jerk means, but ok. I guess we're changing the definitions of words.

I thought Fletcher was a god. And by god, I mean completely average GM while he was here.
 

thestonedkoala

Going Dark
Aug 27, 2004
28,654
1,712
That's not what knee jerk means, but ok. I guess we're changing the definitions of words.

I thought Fletcher was a god. And by god, I mean completely average GM while he was here.
It was a knee jerk reaction that Wild thought they weren't going to be able to sign back Burns (which may or may not have been the correct assumption) and traded him without talking to him.

Also the definition is this:
(of a response) automatic and unthinking

This is the very definition of what they did with Burns. It was an automatic response to a possible cap crunch if they were to sign Parise and Suter and they didn't really think it through.
 

north21

Registered User
May 1, 2014
1,281
468
MN
Kessel on the cheaper than expected would have been ok, lots of team swill regret passing him up at 1.5.
 

BagHead

Registered User
Dec 23, 2010
7,175
4,036
Minneapolis, MN
Kessel doesn't want to play anywhere where there might be pressure to win.
I'm not so sure about that. It may be that he enjoys the desert, and this keeps him there while putting him on what should be a playoff team instead of a bottom feeder. If all he wanted was no expectations, he could have joined a far worse team.

But you may be right. He may be after the Vegas lifestyle while still earning an NHL salary. Hard to know why a man does what he does sometimes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thestonedkoala
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad