Toronto Maple Leafs: Who Would Replace Kyle Dubas?

What if Bruins lose in the next round.
Then im more likely to exit and blow it up. The question is how close are we to a cup.

You are assuming Bruins would win it all. Let’s say TB three-peat last year, would that make the Leafs in the same level as Cup Champs?
Id worry about the mental block, like i do now. But last year gave me some hope where i was very down and defeated on the prior 2 losses.
 
Theres too much variety to simply say cup or bust when youre in the best division in hockey with 3 of the top 5-7 in the league and a powerhouse Bruins team looking to make a final run.

Add in some added cap flexibility expected with Muzzin, Kerfoot and Knies expected to step into a middle 6 role.

If they show poorly i understand and want changes, but theres a scenario where that becomes questionable
Who expects Knies to step into a top 6 role?
 
And how long will that take ? If they fail again, he will have wasted 5 years of 16,34,88 and 91.
I'm saying 'next regime' cause everything Dubas has shown has told me he thinks he's right and only luck has been the factor in their 1st round losses. He's way too stubborn to change the course cause the primary factor in his decisions is being smart and being right.

I am honestly torn about what should be done with Dubas after this year. I mean he's got a great track record in the regular season and the team has set team records for points. On the other hand, his roster construction is specifically designed for regular season success and not for playoff success. It's possible that he gets let off the hook on a technicality:

"Hey my team set all kinds of records and I never missed the playoffs once in my tenure...disregard the fact that the playoffs are a different beast altogether and the very team I put together can both be great in regular season, and lack heart & will for a long playoff run."



RageCage.gif


Some of it has been his fault, but its disingenuous to act like there hasnt been some shitty circumstances.

Marleau wasn't his fault, he never signed that contract. Everyone knew when that contract was signed the Leafs would somehow have to dump him in the final year (SJS weren't even willing to give him 3 years...).

Amirov got brain cancer, not much you can do about that.

He traded a 1st for muzzin which was a solid trade and really needed at the time because again, Lou's best attempt at fixing the D was giving Zaitsev a 7 year deal.

Trading for Foligno was pure desperation because of the illusion that the North division would be a cake walk.

Obviously having to trade back 10 spots to dump Mrazek is solely on him, but I think they made that move because they could still get a player they value at a similar level back in the draft. And really in terms of value per pick, there wasnt much loss (late 1st, early 2nd is practically the same chance of drafting a successful NHLer).

Hes done more than fine for where they have drafted.

And really, theres only 1 player from those 1sts that hes moved that has been a regular NHLer (Jarvis) and again, you might not agree but imo it was not his fault at all that they had to shed that pick to get rid of Marleau. He is not the one that signed the contract.

That trade showed that there were chinks in Dubas' armor, he could have had Hall for a 2nd but took a guy on the decline with a 1st plus. Not a good trade the second he accepted it, the second I saw Foligno put on the blue and white, and especially when we realized he was damaged goods.
 
Then im more likely to exit and blow it up. The question is how close are we to a cup.


Id worry about the mental block, like i do now. But last year gave me some hope where i was very down and defeated on the prior 2 losses.
To me, it always come down to the question, can our core do it collectively. Since they got the talents but is it just a mental thing or the right mix or they are just great players but not winners or a combination of the above.
That’s a more important question.
I could be wrong but MM won the Memorial Cup but didn’t do that well in the WJC and did okay in the WC. Willie was really good in the WJC and if wasn’t for McD and Team Canada, he would have led the Swedes to Gold and be MVP of the tournament. Willie also won MVP in the WC.
JT won countless stuff but the one like World Cup of Hockey, he was not a core piece then but did play an important role in Sochi until he got injured.
Don’t recall AM winning WJC or leading team USA in WJC.
Now I am not pointing finger at who is not a winner and should be traded….but it is something that needed to look at.
Having said all that, I still believe the boys can do it collectively bc Gio chose to stay with this team and I am 100% sure Gio wants to chase the Cup and he can join any top teams in the summer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: usernamezrhardtodo
Well balanced? Dont think so...they have 4 very talented players...
Absolutely well balanced. They have a lot more than 4 talented players. They are good offensively, good defensively, and have good goaltending. That's the definition of well balanced.
Yeah, most of us lived through the early rebuild day to day following the lead up to the 2015 draft and got all the angles of the Hunter-Marner (and Hofford) connection as it happened so you can't really re-write that story.
Yeah, you can't rewrite that story. We all lived through 2015. We all know the connection between Marner and Hunter, but we all also know that he did not make a unanimous decision on a franchise-defining 4th overall, and that there were internal discussions about who to draft, which would include co-GM Dubas. I don't know why you would think that Hunter is the only person in the world who liked Marner. It's not like he was some diamond in the rough. He was a lottery pick that was one of the most dynamic prospects drafted in the cap era.
 
Last edited:
Brian Burke, Jim Rutherford or any other shithead dinosaur who would f*** up the organization for at least a decade so the haters could appreciate Dubas for just a second.
 
Brian Burke, Jim Rutherford or any other shithead dinosaur who would f*** up the organization for at least a decade so the haters could appreciate Dubas for just a second.
It doesn’t have to be a dinosaur but maybe it could be someone like one of the countless GMs that have won a cup in the almost 2 decades it’s been since we have won even a single round.
 
It doesn’t have to be a dinosaur but maybe it could be someone like one of the countless GMs that have won a cup in the almost 2 decades it’s been since we have won even a single round.
Kyle Dubas is the only non-dinosaur hockey person in the whole wide world. It's either him or a dinosaur. That's the fear mongering from the Dubas fan club.
 
I think Ryan Hardy will eventually make a great GM but hasn't been at the pro level long enough.

Problem is if you replace Dubas, you are pretty much looking at other candidates who are rookies or other veteran GMs who have warts as well. There isn't a guy out there who is the perfect GM. I lean closer to an up and Comer like Sakic and Yzerman who played the game somewhat recently, have a Guage on what it's like in the room and on the ice these days as opposed to guys like Lou, Rutherford or Burke where the game might have passed them by. Spezza is that guy that I think will be that guy some day. He was in the NHL just last year, great leader, is an absolute hockey nerd and still seems driven. But he wouldn't be sniffing that kind of role for probably another 4 yrs.
 
Continuing with Dubas is akin to the definition of insanity....he should have been gone already...along with Keefe & Shanaplan. Who's kidding who here? Failure after failure and on it goes...time to move on..

Weird you didn't mention a single player.

Matthews, Nylander, Marner, and Rielly should all be going if we are going with your "insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results".
 
It doesn’t have to be a dinosaur but maybe it could be someone like one of the countless GMs that have won a cup in the almost 2 decades it’s been since we have won even a single round.

We should have grabbed Ken Holland.

Stevie Y wouldn't have fit the criteria, so forget him.

Stan Bowman could maybe come in.

Doug Armstrong switched jobs recently, and Arizona is looking good so far.

Rutherfurd won one recently, we could have brought him in.

Birsebois and Sakic don't fit the criteria so they wouldn't have been good.

Peter Chiarelli normally turns teams around, he would have been a good one.
 
Weird you didn't mention a single player.

Matthews, Nylander, Marner, and Rielly should all be going if we are going with your "insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results".
You're probably right. A new group of players with different attributes at a more effective price point may be the answer. This group isnt....
 
  • Like
Reactions: All Mod Cons
You're probably right. A new group of players with different attributes at a more effective price point may be the answer. This group isnt....

Dubas inherited a group of losers and should be given time to change them, we finally agree, thank you.
 
Dubas inherited a group of losers and should be given time to change them, we finally agree, thank you.

LOL. He has been here since all were drafted and has been GM coming up on 5 years. Plenty of time to change them but he "bet everything" on them. If they fail again, your boy needs to fall on his sword.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad