- Dec 12, 2017
- 25,871
- 12,349
Then they should have made changes after last season, but they didn’t.I disagree bc this team should have higher expectations than winning a round.
Then they should have made changes after last season, but they didn’t.I disagree bc this team should have higher expectations than winning a round.
I said the same thing last seasonThen they should have made changes after last season, but they didn’t.
Then im more likely to exit and blow it up. The question is how close are we to a cup.What if Bruins lose in the next round.
Id worry about the mental block, like i do now. But last year gave me some hope where i was very down and defeated on the prior 2 losses.You are assuming Bruins would win it all. Let’s say TB three-peat last year, would that make the Leafs in the same level as Cup Champs?
Who expects Knies to step into a top 6 role?Theres too much variety to simply say cup or bust when youre in the best division in hockey with 3 of the top 5-7 in the league and a powerhouse Bruins team looking to make a final run.
Add in some added cap flexibility expected with Muzzin, Kerfoot and Knies expected to step into a middle 6 role.
If they show poorly i understand and want changes, but theres a scenario where that becomes questionable
I'm saying 'next regime' cause everything Dubas has shown has told me he thinks he's right and only luck has been the factor in their 1st round losses. He's way too stubborn to change the course cause the primary factor in his decisions is being smart and being right.And how long will that take ? If they fail again, he will have wasted 5 years of 16,34,88 and 91.
Some of it has been his fault, but its disingenuous to act like there hasnt been some shitty circumstances.
Marleau wasn't his fault, he never signed that contract. Everyone knew when that contract was signed the Leafs would somehow have to dump him in the final year (SJS weren't even willing to give him 3 years...).
Amirov got brain cancer, not much you can do about that.
He traded a 1st for muzzin which was a solid trade and really needed at the time because again, Lou's best attempt at fixing the D was giving Zaitsev a 7 year deal.
Trading for Foligno was pure desperation because of the illusion that the North division would be a cake walk.
Obviously having to trade back 10 spots to dump Mrazek is solely on him, but I think they made that move because they could still get a player they value at a similar level back in the draft. And really in terms of value per pick, there wasnt much loss (late 1st, early 2nd is practically the same chance of drafting a successful NHLer).
Hes done more than fine for where they have drafted.
And really, theres only 1 player from those 1sts that hes moved that has been a regular NHLer (Jarvis) and again, you might not agree but imo it was not his fault at all that they had to shed that pick to get rid of Marleau. He is not the one that signed the contract.
GM: Don Cherry
Head Coach: Tiger Williams
Go sign Pastaneck Grapes!!!
I didn’t many doWho expects Knies to step into a top 6 role?
To me, it always come down to the question, can our core do it collectively. Since they got the talents but is it just a mental thing or the right mix or they are just great players but not winners or a combination of the above.Then im more likely to exit and blow it up. The question is how close are we to a cup.
Id worry about the mental block, like i do now. But last year gave me some hope where i was very down and defeated on the prior 2 losses.
About half of the Leaf fans who post on HF.Who expects Knies to step into a top 6 role?
I think he will make the team but only for him to have a feel of the game instead of coming in and playing some type of role.About half of the Leaf fans who post on HF.
Absolutely well balanced. They have a lot more than 4 talented players. They are good offensively, good defensively, and have good goaltending. That's the definition of well balanced.Well balanced? Dont think so...they have 4 very talented players...
Yeah, you can't rewrite that story. We all lived through 2015. We all know the connection between Marner and Hunter, but we all also know that he did not make a unanimous decision on a franchise-defining 4th overall, and that there were internal discussions about who to draft, which would include co-GM Dubas. I don't know why you would think that Hunter is the only person in the world who liked Marner. It's not like he was some diamond in the rough. He was a lottery pick that was one of the most dynamic prospects drafted in the cap era.Yeah, most of us lived through the early rebuild day to day following the lead up to the 2015 draft and got all the angles of the Hunter-Marner (and Hofford) connection as it happened so you can't really re-write that story.
It doesn’t have to be a dinosaur but maybe it could be someone like one of the countless GMs that have won a cup in the almost 2 decades it’s been since we have won even a single round.Brian Burke, Jim Rutherford or any other shithead dinosaur who would f*** up the organization for at least a decade so the haters could appreciate Dubas for just a second.
Kyle Dubas is the only non-dinosaur hockey person in the whole wide world. It's either him or a dinosaur. That's the fear mongering from the Dubas fan club.It doesn’t have to be a dinosaur but maybe it could be someone like one of the countless GMs that have won a cup in the almost 2 decades it’s been since we have won even a single round.
Lol, so true.Kyle Dubas is the only non-dinosaur hockey person in the whole wide world. It's either him or a dinosaur. That's the fear mongering from the Dubas fan club.
Maybe, but I don’t think management is pinning their hopes on him playing in the top six this season.About half of the Leaf fans who post on HF.
you tell em Nooodles because if loving Dubas is wrong , i never want to be right , lolBrian Burke, Jim Rutherford or any other shithead dinosaur who would f*** up the organization for at least a decade so the haters could appreciate Dubas for just a second.
Continuing with Dubas is akin to the definition of insanity....he should have been gone already...along with Keefe & Shanaplan. Who's kidding who here? Failure after failure and on it goes...time to move on..
It doesn’t have to be a dinosaur but maybe it could be someone like one of the countless GMs that have won a cup in the almost 2 decades it’s been since we have won even a single round.
You're probably right. A new group of players with different attributes at a more effective price point may be the answer. This group isnt....Weird you didn't mention a single player.
Matthews, Nylander, Marner, and Rielly should all be going if we are going with your "insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results".
You're probably right. A new group of players with different attributes at a more effective price point may be the answer. This group isnt....
Dubas inherited a group of losers and should be given time to change them, we finally agree, thank you.