CantLoseWithMatthews
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2015
- 49,735
- 59,494
Begs the question...
He's probably not even their top prospect from his own draft class
Begs the question...
Agreed there is a strong case for that. You could say all of Moldenhauer, Lisowsky and Hilderby progressed more.He's probably not even their top prospect from his own draft class
Agreed, plus Grebyonkin. Minten is okay and should see NHL games but I don't see any chance he should be considered our top prospectAgreed there is a strong case for that. You could say all of Moldenhauer, Lisowsky and Hilderby progressed more.
Right Grebyonkin too. Forgot about him. Probably our biggest riser in the system.Agreed, plus Grebyonkin. Minten is okay and should see NHL games but I don't see any chance he should be considered our top prospect
Right Grebyonkin too. Forgot about him. Probably our biggest riser in the system.
Agreed, he needs to take a big step. Offense was a big question mark for him coming into last season and while the numbers went up, although not that much, the lack of ES scoring was concerning. He played on a very good and very deep team last year, perhaps the offensive opportunities werent really there?There's "pro ready" but then there's "ceiling potential" .. Based on the wording, Minten appears to be most polished to make the jump but that doesn't mean he's anything more than a 4th line centre right now. And that could be his ceiling if he can't progress his offensive game.
I think a realistic "good" potential is a quality #3C. This season is a big one for him to take the reigns of the forward group.
Agreed, he needs to take a big step. Offense was a big question mark for him coming into last season and while the numbers went up, although not that much, the lack of ES scoring was concerning. He played on a very good and very deep team last year, perhaps the offensive opportunities werent really there?
With key players moving on in Kamloops this year he should be an offensive focal point - he needs to show he can thrive in that role this upcoming season.
I’d say 0.82 points per game to 1.175 is a fairly notable year over year increase
Yes, he's our best prospect if we no longer count Knies as a prospect. I'm not sure he'll be a center in the pros.
Yes his skating is way way way too SLOW .. we already have JT OMG i told you guys last year this guy is too SLOW for C in pros .. he may make it on LW if he plays wall well but that's what we drafted .. Dubie screwed up huge in that draft .. we could have taken Beck in 1st round instead of trading down and we would have a C with NHL wheels right now .. Dubie just not a hockey guy .. best thing Pitt can do is carve him out of draft and keep him in a PREZ type position to manage boardWhat makes you question his ability to play C in the Pros? It seems that's the least of the question marks to me. Decent size, strong hockey IQ, good defensive play.... I see 3C as the ceiling at this point, but I do see C there... is it the skating?
Minten has the potential to be an outstanding 2-way player.Agreed there is a strong case for that. You could say all of Moldenhauer, Lisowsky and Hilderby progressed more.
His bottom is not an NHL player. Theres been way better prospects that have never sniffed the NHL. Saying at worse he is a 3C in the NHL is insane. If that was truly the case he would have been drafted much higher.Minten has the potential to be an outstanding 2-way player.
I dont think he will ever be a #1C but a high end #2C would be his roof, with #3C as his bottom.
he just thinks the game better than most players his age, and is positionally outstanding.
I'll use ROR as an example ...similar in size at the same age and Minten put up far better numbers in JR's
ROR however went right to the NHL and that was to his detriment and his first 2 seasons should have been development years, but, he developed in the NHL and had unspectacular seasons of 26 points each.
from his 3rd season onwards he started to show much better but wasnt the 2-way force until he landed in Buffalo in his 7th season,
then he went to the Blues, and became the 'star' 2-way player.
He never scored 30 goals and only had 1 season over 70 points, but, it was his complete game that was/is his calling card and made him special.
Minten i believe has that potential as a 2-way center, and is a better skater than ROR. ...if he develops into anything close to ROR is up to him and is the pie in the sky scenario, but, in a worse case scenario, maybe a Matt Stajan like player, who can fill in at #2C but is really a #3C.
I just really like the way he sees the game.
I just think his hockey IQ is too high for him not to make it ...I guess its possible that the offence may not translate, but, I'd play him ahead of Holmberg today, and see him as good as Kampf on the defensive side with a much higher offensive potential.His bottom is not an NHL player. Theres been way better prospects that have never sniffed the NHL. Saying at worse he is a 3C in the NHL is insane. If that was truly the case he would have been drafted much higher.
He had nearly half his points on the PP. Thats never a good sign for a junior player if theyre struggling to produce offence off of the PP.
A prospect like Leo Carlsson is someone that you could say at worse he ends up a 3C, not a prospect like Minten...
I just think his hockey IQ is too high for him not to make it ...I guess its possible that the offence may not translate, but, I'd play him ahead of Holmberg today, and see him as good as Kampf on the defensive side with a much higher offensive potential.
Perhaps I'm overrating hockey IQ, but, his other tools (skating/shot) are also above average and while he may not have one 'elite' skill, his hockey IQ is elite.
what i noticed most in those playoffs was his positioning ...very similar to ROR as far as how he handled the defensive side, and on the offensive side he was trying to make many passes but his wingers were just not going to the right spots on the ice. ...he also got a few bad bounces off ref's that looked bad.Hockey IQ looked good to me as well from what I've seen. His game is pro hockey style for whatever that's worth. As you said, these are layers on top of other skills like skating and shot that look to project to pro hockey. My main concern is that he has been getting himself banged up already. I believe he played through an injury in the WHL playoffs.
Yes, he's our best prospect if we no longer count Knies as a prospect. I'm not sure he'll be a center in the pros.
Hence the conditional statement.Knies has played 3 regular season games and what? 5 playoff games?
He's still a prospect
I'd bet on Minten being more effective at the NHL level than any of these guys. This was a solid pick if the goal was bottom 6 depth down the line.Agreed there is a strong case for that. You could say all of Moldenhauer, Lisowsky and Hilderby progressed more.
Generally a bad idea to draft “bottom 6“ guys in the second round.I'd bet on Minten being more effective at the NHL level than any of these guys. This was a solid pick if the goal was bottom 6 depth down the line.
I was looking at a tweet of the LA Kings prospect pool from 2021 (when they were rated tops in the league) and it is absolutely crazy to see how the perception of those players has changed so much in two short seasons. Some of those players are complete busts now and some that weren't even on the list are now really decent prospects. Development is definitely not linear.
"if the goal was...."Generally a bad idea to draft “bottom 6“ guys in the second round.