The Management
Registered User
Acciari has come as advertised so far (appreciate he has suited up for all of two games). He does not look like a prototypical Leafs bottom sixer, and I say that as a compliment.
Just looked at O'Reilly's stats for the season...
What in the actual f*** is Dubas doing giving up all those picks on an underperforming rental?
This reminds me of the Foligno trade from 2 years ago
Throw in an extra 1st, that's the kind of package that gets close to landing Meier - which is the type of player (entering his prime, not a pending UFA) the Leafs should've been targeting
So ...
Bunting-Matthews-Nylander
Kerfoot-Tavares-Marner
Jarnkrok-O'Reilly-Acciari
Engvall-Kampf-ZAR
?
That's not quite true. Broken bones don't just "heal and that's it". They will be weaker and might be less powerful for a long time. In figure skating for example, a person might have broken their foot and for the rest of their career, could never jump nearly as high as before. But of course, hockey might not have such specialized measurements for performance.O’Reilly missed 14 games this season with a broken foot. Broken bones tend to heal and that’s it. It’s not like a muscle injury that can linger. Kane‘s hip has been a nagging issue for about 3 years. So Kane’s hip is far more likely to pop up as an issue than O’Reilly’s foot.
If that's the only reason STL does it, then consider the realities of math and realize that even a 3-23 record the rest of the way would have the Blues holding the 4th pick before the lottery draw if other teams hold their paces. If they win the lottery they win the lottery but this trade will not produce enough losses by design to do what you hope.Only reason STL does it, is we want to hit rock bottom for that dude from North Vancouver.
I know that, but all the same Kane isn't done yet and he had a hat trick last night.O’Reilly missed 14 games this season with a broken foot. Broken bones tend to heal and that’s it. It’s not like a muscle injury that can linger. Kane‘s hip has been a nagging issue for about 3 years. So Kane’s hip is far more likely to pop up as an issue than O’Reilly’s foot.
It’s a lottery, it would enhance our odds quite a bit…If that's the only reason STL does it, then consider the realities of math and realize that even a 3-23 record the rest of the way would have the Blues holding the 4th pick before the lottery draw if other teams hold their paces. If they win the lottery they win the lottery but this trade will not produce enough losses by design to do what you hope.
I’m well aware of the hat trick. And frankly, I’d have no objection to the Leafs getting Kane but I still think that Kane is more of an injury risk than O’Reilly. Heck, Auston Matthews is probably more of an injury risk than O’Reilly.I know that, but all the same Kane isn't done yet and he had a hat trick last night.
Yeah, ok. So do I.I’m well aware of the hat trick. And frankly, I’d have no objection to the Leafs getting Kane but I still think that Kane is more of an injury risk than O’Reilly. Heck, Auston Matthews is probably more of an injury risk than O’Reilly.
The Blues have a 5% chance right now and if they finish 4th they would have a 9.5% chance. The difference is 4.5%. Now, it's almost mathematically impossible to gain that 4.5% to get all the way to 4th – as I pointed out already – but even if they managed to pull off a once-in-decades level collapse to get there it would decidedly not "enhance our odds quite a bit"It’s a lottery, it would enhance our odds quite a bit…
Three? Lucky if they make 2 from those picks, it will take till 2025 but we went all in and replaced Kadri.Our prospect pool will suck for years but we won't have Mathews if we keep losing.3 assets.
Gaudette and Abramov are not NHL players
We get you like the deal for your team. Quit trying to tell yourself (let alone all of us) those picks won’t amount to anything. Last I checked the Blues are pretty damn good at drafting from the back of pack.Three? Lucky if they make 2 from those picks, it will take till 2025 but we went all in and replaced Kadri.Our prospect pool will suck for years but we won't have Mathews if we keep losing.
this is such a lazy take.The leafs biggest need wasn't addressed. 2 goalies and 1 or 2 solid stay home D men. Crazyville.
He was fired if he didn't. It's showtime!So Dubas HAS TO be fired if this doesnt work out
He has to be
Knies has to be the missing piece upfront, now a physical defensive defman and pray for goaltending. I heard Schenn was too steep, he would barely make 6th def here .this is such a lazy take.
The leafs problems are not defensive personnel for the umpteenth time.
Yes thomas was 20th parayko was 86th round. Kyrou 35th. Snuugerrund 23rd. Plenty more late picks that are nhl playersWe get you like the deal for your team. Quit being a tool and trying to tell yourself (let alone all of us) those picks won’t amount to anything. Last I checked the Blues are pretty damn good at drafting from the back of pack.
Exactly. And that's with posters around here suggesting the defense and goaltending is mediocre.
You guys can flame away at me for the suggestion, as I know most everyone OUTside of STL hates him. However, if you got Dubas to convince Army to swap Binnington for Murray (and QUITE a sweetener), I would bet good money he’ll win you a cup. He’s been fantastic this year, the team in front of him has been hot garbage on the back check all year (except for the 3 games post Tarasenko trade). He’s from Toronto, and is just a different animal in the playoffs.
Only reason STL does it, is we want to hit rock bottom for that dude from North Vancouver.
We get you like the deal for your team. Quit being a tool and trying to tell yourself (let alone all of us) those picks won’t amount to anything. Last I checked the Blues are pretty damn good at drafting from the back of pack.
Yes thomas was 20th parayko was 86th round. Kyrou 35th. Snuugerrund 23rd. Plenty more late picks that are nhl players
Nah, we’ll already have 2 or 3 of those in addition to our top 5 pick…Sounds like if you guys get a top-5 pick you should trade it down for 3 or 4 in the 20s.
No we need a top 5 pick for a franchise playerSounds like if you guys get a top-5 pick you should trade it down for 3 or 4 in the 20s.