Tairy Greene
Registered User
- Feb 2, 2020
- 786
- 654
He would definitely be on Montreal's 3rd pairNot a fan of this player .... Ask yourself .. where would he fit in on any of the final four teams you watched play in this years playoffs.?
He would definitely be on Montreal's 3rd pairNot a fan of this player .... Ask yourself .. where would he fit in on any of the final four teams you watched play in this years playoffs.?
Me too.I like Dermott.
Happy with the signing!
Either they expect him to get picked up by Seattle, or they save some money by letting Holl get picked up. If the Leafs do keep him, a 2 year deal allow Dermott to prove he deserves to be on the Leafs isn't the worst thing, plus its a movable contract if he doesn't succeed . Perhaps a change of scenery would help him. If Holl goes, you could bring back Bogosian on a cheaper deal for the PK and give Sandin the 2nd line minutes. I think Sandin would benefit greatly playing with Muzzin, I mean, anyone would but his speed would be beneficialI'm confused at why the Leafs would pay him this when they showed very little confidence in him during the POs..
All of a sudden now he's worth 1.5M when he wasn't even locked in as one of your top 6 when it mattered and even made one of your teams costliest PO mistakes? Strange.
I kind of wanna puke at how soft that defense is.Reilly, Brodie, Muzzin, Dermott, Sandin and Liljegren would be fine with me.
@phillipmike -- Last year Dermott made a smart move to accept his QO and sign below his market value, to help ease his way into the lineup.Considering he was worth more than 863K and only signed that to play and stay in Toronto it makes perfect sense.
He was a 1.2M defender last year and got the bump up from signing another year
No he wasn’t. And if he was so generous to give us a discount last year to stay in Toronto, why isn’t he giving us a discount again this year. Logic makes no sense.
He had little leverage last year and got the contract he deserved. I’m not hating on Dubas, I praised him for that contract. He got a good deal.
But he is coming off a worse season with less leverage and he gets more? That’s a worse deal.
Go ahead.
Sandin is small, but none of them are soft.
Sandin is undersized and inexperienced, and that showed in the playoffs.Even if you don't think it's soft - it's undersized and inexperienced and I wouldn't be confident whatsoever we hang in a playoff series if that's the defense we run.
The idea that Dermott was not worth more than his QO last year is ridiculous. You don't think he could have gotten more? He easily could have taken Leafs to arbitration to get probably 1.2-1.4M. He signed the deal betting on himself and making himself fit into this roster.
Ethan Bear signed for 2X2M as a comparable. Bear had a better offensive season for sure. Dermott was worth an extra 300-500K last year and signed the QO to fit on this team
He's not giving the discount again because he wants to make some money here? Believe it or not Leafs have more cap this offseason and is one of the reasons Dermott is making a little more on his deal.
@phillipmike -- Last year Dermott made a smart move to accept his QO and sign below his market value, to help ease his way into the lineup.
At that time, the Leafs were under severe cap-stress and the Finnish Bobby Orr -- what's his name? -- was the flavour of the month. A difference of a few hundred thousand dollars in salary could be important in deciding who played and who didn't when the Leafs could barely ice a 21-man roster. Leaving some change on the table didn't hurt Dermott in eventually winning the rotating audition between him and the new guy who was later traded to Columbus.
I'm pretty sure Dermott could easily have held out for more by agreement or by arbitration. Taking a bit less was much better for him, and a bit better for the Leafs.
@I am Canadian -- $1.2 would have been very reasonable last season. $1.5 is very reasonable this season and next.
Show me your evidence that he couldn't have got more.You guys honestly believe he gave a discount after the Leafs had 3 defensemen under contract (Rielly, Muzzin and Holl) and just signed 3 more (Brodie, Bogosian and Lehtonen) before they signed him? You really think his agent told him, hey its a good idea for you to take 50% less which means you will pay me less?
Unless you have evidence that Dermott had better offers and took less, this is just speculation. And you are asking me to speculate on speculation if you want me to believe he could have made more last season and he happily took less. Im happy to concede if you have evidence.
We are missing da mean and nasty component to defenders .. Muzzy used to be but no longer is .. always good to have a Pronger type who scares da bleep out of everyone on ice cause he could, at any time, take his stick and wrap it around your ankles and finish someone off for year .. but Sandin Muzzy Brodie Dermy Bogo and Holl are not soft .. Rielly is .. it is why last year before Stl unloaded Edmundson I was guy who said we needed to pick him up but Habs beat us to punch .. our defense is much better but we still need to upgrade with a big nasty guy .. a Bogo upgrade I would hope
We are missing da mean and nasty component to defenders .. Muzzy used to be but no longer is .. always good to have a Pronger type who scares da bleep out of everyone on ice cause he could, at any time, take his stick and wrap it around your ankles and finish someone off for year .. but Sandin Muzzy Brodie Dermy Bogo and Holl are not soft .. Rielly is .. it is why last year before Stl unloaded Edmundson I was guy who said we needed to pick him up but Habs beat us to punch .. our defense is much better but we still need to upgrade with a big nasty guy .. a Bogo upgrade I would hope
Show me your evidence that he couldn't have got more.
2019-20: 56 GP, 4 Goals, 7 Assists, 11 Points, +14, 17.19 ATOI
Here is $863k and a 1 year commitment
2020-21: 51 GP, 2 Goals, 4 Assists, 6 Points, -1, 13.13 ATOI
Here is $1.5M per and a 2 year commitment
He is coming off a worse season than 2019-20 and got almost double the money and double the term?
You're saying he couldn't have got a better deal last year. I'm saying he could have. Neither of us have access to inside information, and we have a difference if opinion.Im not making that argument. You are speculating and Im just laying out the facts and the facts are after a worse season Demortt got more money and double the term last season.
Yep Chiarot is gone to seattle .. Kerfoot likely gone from us (if we protect Dermy; otherwise Dermy gone too) to Seattle .. both teams are gonna lose a solid pieceYeah, I think a bigger defenceman with a mean streak is an ingredient we could use. I wonder what Edmundson or Chariot would cost...aren't they both potential expansion draft fodder?
You're saying he couldn't have got a better deal last year. I'm saying he could have. Neither of us have access to inside information, and we have a difference if opinion.
You're predicating an opinion that his new deal is too much based on what he got last year, and I think your opinion is wrong.
The idea that Dermott was not worth more than his QO last year is ridiculous. You don't think he could have gotten more? He easily could have taken Leafs to arbitration to get probably 1.2-1.4M. He signed the deal betting on himself and making himself fit into this roster.
Ethan Bear signed for 2X2M as a comparable. Bear had a better offensive season for sure. Dermott was worth an extra 300-500K last year and signed the QO to fit on this team
He's not giving the discount again because he wants to make some money here? Believe it or not Leafs have more cap this offseason and is one of the reasons Dermott is making a little more on his deal.
Im just making common sense. If you are Dermott do you take 400-500k less if you believe you can get more after a team signed 6 defensemen before you? Neither of us have insider information but you are speculating that he took less out of the goodness of his heart? It makes no sense.
No, I'm speculating that he took less to advance his career. He was in the rare situation where a slightly smaller salary might give him a better opportunity for playing time.Im just making common sense. If you are Dermott do you take 400-500k less if you believe you can get more after a team signed 6 defensemen before you? Neither of us have insider information but you are speculating that he took less out of the goodness of his heart? It makes no sense.
You've hit the nail on the head.While I doubt kindness had little to do with it, I do suspect he took his last contract in part to ensure he had a lineup spot (ie not picking a fight with management over a few hundred k). Seemed like he just wanted to get it out of the way and focus on the coming season.
While I doubt kindness had little to do with it, I do suspect he took his last contract in part to ensure he had a lineup spot (ie not picking a fight with management over a few hundred k). Seemed like he just wanted to get it out of the way and focus on the coming season.
No, I'm speculating that he took less to advance his career. He was in the rare situation where a slightly smaller salary might give him a better opportunity for playing time.
I'm also speculating that others such as Engvall, Liljegren, Lehtonen and Barabanov didn't get as much time on the roster as they might have in a normal year where the Leafs were not so perilously close to cap on an ongoing basis. Once injuries freed up some space, some but not all of those guys finally got more time on the roster.
My theory makes more sense to me than your "common-sense" speculation.
I think, in the big picture, Travis Dermott avoided being penny-wise and pound-foolish.
@phillipmike -- we've convinced each other of nothing and we just disagree. I will leave it at that.
While I doubt kindness had little to do with it, I do suspect he took his last contract in part to ensure he had a lineup spot (ie not picking a fight with management over a few hundred k). Seemed like he just wanted to get it out of the way and focus on the coming season.
I don't think I've convinced anyone of anything -- nor do I care to -- but I think @Menzinger @JT AM da real deal maybe @Kurtz and others hold the same thoughts as me. In fact, I think @Menzinger pointed this train of thought out long ago. Its not new or novel.Remember that for next time. Im fine to concede on my position if you have stats, substance or facts but if you are coming with speculation of what you think happened you may not get anywhere with me or anyone else for that matter.