Mess
Global Moderator
7th overall is a valuable asset.There has been mixed reports about that deal to Buffalo. I thought Ottawa was intending to retain 50% of his contract in that deal, but thehockeyguy and SDPN both spoke of it being only 25%. If it was in fact only 25% Ottawa was willing to retain for Buffalo, I'd think Ottawa would have been willing to move back to 25 if there was no retention. Would you be okay will Murray and his full 6.25M if 7th overall was included?
So what I think you mean since retention was never made clear on the Buffalo deal;
1) Matt Murray + 50% retention(=$3 mil AAV) + 7th overall for #16 overall
or
2) Matt Murray + 25% retention (=$1.5 mil AAV) + 7th overall for #25 overall
Or as the Leafs got Matt Murray +25 % retention (a $1.5 mil AAV value) for 3rd and 7th rounder, and also dealt Mrazek a player having only $3.8 mil cap X 2 with Leafs 1st rounder #25 to draft Fraser Minton.
Even after Murray's retention its still more $4.687 mil than Mzazek @ $3.8 mil had, and it only cost Ottawa a 3rd and 7th to dump him.
If your asking me would I take Murray + $1.5 mil extra cap hit and pick #7 overall or Murray -$1.5 mil less cap for a 3rd round and 7th rounder instead (to save that little cap) I take the first on every day of the week and twice on Sundays. For $1.5 mil cap savings for 2 years the difference between #7OA pick vs. 3rd rounder and 7th rounder in value is the size of the Grand Canyon in different returns. IMO
Last edited: