if this deal means less time for the Goat,, great deal
For me the annoying thing about all this is just the zero NHL payoff to all these pet projects as well as the fact that when was the last time a depth defenseman was acquired to bolster the lineup?
I know you are joking but as there does seem some confusion in this thread, if memory serves me correctly Matthews and Malgin did not play on the same line when they both played with ZSC Lions. Malgin was mostly a center for us here in Zürich.
It is funny that some of the same folks who may bemoan the use of say advaced stats become fixated on objectively terrible ones like the number of inches a player is.
don't you get tired for making endless excuses for Dubas ?What does that even mean? If Dubas and Yzerman both get 3 smurfs back in an AHL contract trade, it's ok for Yzerman because he's not "actively seeking it out"?
You've run out of straws to grasp and have to go for semantics. You're allowed to not like Dubas without needing to invent fake reasons for it. Go for the contracts, at least you can make some sort of real argument there.
Okay, then let's sign Fabrice Herzog. We still have his rights and he played on his line.
They're bodies for the 4th line if we need them in a pinch, like if we trade Kerfoot and someone else gets injured. It costs us nothing to have some insurance.
Do we have a depth D problem? These are the Marincin of forwards, we have 8 or 9 Marincin level (or better) D in the system that we can use. Our Malgin level D transaction was signing Gravel in the summer or getting Harpur. We have a ton of tweeners we can throw at an injury hole, it's the top of the depth chart we're missing.
First time I poked my head in this thread but this was exactly what I thought. Not sure why Florida would do this but I'm ok with it.Dubas traded a bad player for a better player. Why are fans so weirdly obsessed with size?
For me here’s the problem. We have an entire spectrum of small guys with skill and skating and some random upside. Ranging from Johnsson, Petan, Bracco, Timashov, Brooks and now Malgin, they are all filling an extremely low impact portion of the roster. Add to the fact that we’ve also run through Ennis and Carcone last season and the fact that our two biggest OHL prospects are Robertson and SDA, why do we have a pipeline of 6-8 players who fill non impact roles that should be upgraded with bigger bodies anyway?
They cost us nothing and most of those names are functional depth that would have cost assets if they were big and physical on top of being functional. Some of them should be upgraded when the time comes, but we can't afford to spend 2nds on bigger better 4th liners this year because of how expensive cleaning up the Marleau mess was.
If we were wasting assets on Petans and Malgins, if be right there with you. But we're not. The biggest legitimate gripe IMO is that Agostino and Korshkov aren't getting regular 4th line minutes but that's not a big enough problem to really care about much.
To put it another way. Even if Denis Malgin turns into Andreas Johnsson, so what? We don’t even want Andreas Johnsson.
We were.You ever stop to wonder why the California teams or St. Louis or Boston always have big mean 6’5” defensive defensemen coming up through their system who can grow into functional defensemen at the NHL level It’s because they go look for them and stock them up at every level year after year like we are doing with small skill little players. We seem to be trying to fill some little smurf line that doesn’t need filling.
Lol those are a bunch of Ahl guys you’re talking about. I’m talking about the nhl. Last year we didn’t have a first round pick, but our second and third rounders made the world jr’s and our fourth rounder might be ncaa’s rookie of the year.. our other 4th rounder has double the points of anybody else on his team....Carcone/Petan/Malgin our entire draft from last year .
and who's impressive from our last 2 drafts outside of Sandin and Robertson ?
drafting small productive players then acting like they're killing it because they're still productive and projecting all to be NHLers is absurd
Yes but at least we got softerI knew we needed to get smaller. Now we have someone to sit beside Petan in the press box.
We were.
Rasanen
Middleton
Desrocher
Greenway
Gordeev
Nielsen
Carcone/Petan/Malgin our entire draft from last year .
and who's impressive from our last 2 drafts outside of Sandin and Robertson ?
drafting small productive players then acting like they're killing it because they're still productive and projecting all to be NHLers is absurd
We were.
Rasanen
Middleton
Desrocher
Greenway
Gordeev
Nielsen
Speak for yourself. I'd easily take a 20 goal and 40 point NHL caliber player over a non NHL player in MarchmentTo put it another way. Even if Denis Malgin turns into Andreas Johnsson, so what? We don’t even want Andreas Johnsson.
Im not so sure Clifford can even play our skill game.Clifford-Spezza-Malgin
Could be a decent fourth line.