Space umpire
Registered User
3 cups, how many playoff series have the leafs won while the hawks were winning 3 cups?Good luck to the Hawks in the 1st round as well....
3 cups, how many playoff series have the leafs won while the hawks were winning 3 cups?Good luck to the Hawks in the 1st round as well....
Not hard to figure out. The Leafs have not been out of the first round since 2004 and the Hawks won their Cups in 2010, 2013 and 20153 cups, how many playoff series have the leafs won while the hawks were winning 3 cups?
And while Bowman wasn’t perfect (hardly). I’m fine with selling assets to add cups 2 and 3. That’s some of the reason why the hawks are in this position.Not hard to figure out. The Leafs have not been out of the first round since 2004 and the Hawks won their Cups in 2010, 2013 and 2015
I am not claiming anything about prospects.And while Bowman wasn’t perfect (hardly). I’m fine with selling assets to add cups 2 and 3. That’s some of the reason why the hawks are in this position.
You folks are all claiming top prospects aren’t available. That’s not how winning happens.
As a stop gap place holder?
Pavel Francouz
Vitek Vanecek
Joonas Korpisalo
Casey DeSmith
Braden Holtby
Mikko Koskinen
Martin Jones
Jack Campbell
David Rittich
Brian Elliott
Anton Forsberg
Anton Khudobin
Jaro Halak
As a longer term solution?
Darcy Kuemper
Ville Husso
Plenty of options and plenty of better ways to spend $3.8 million of their cap and less of an injury track record on pretty much all of them.
No team is going to give up a first for fleury without some sort of sweetener added ( considerable) or a bad contract going the other way.Seems fair.
The only issue is that Chicago would obviously prefer a deal where they don't have to take a player like Mrazek back.
This offer could be beaten by a team that doesn't saddle Chicago with a player like Mrazek.
I'm not saying the Leafs should go after Fleury but why is their over-reaction to their 1st rounder being traded for a known commodity? it's going to be a very late 1st rounder (probably mid to late 20's) and hardly a guarantee of ever even being an NHL regular. We aren't talking a top 10 pick here.
Dubas stated the 1st will only be traded for a player with term, probably a smart move after the Foligno debacle....I'm not saying the Leafs should go after Fleury but why is their over-reaction to their 1st rounder being traded for a known commodity? it's going to be a very late 1st rounder (probably mid to late 20's) and hardly a guarantee of ever even being an NHL regular. We aren't talking a top 10 pick here.
that makes sense if he stated that. Sometimes people just overate the value of a last first rounder which could easily be considered a second rounder depending on the strength of a draft.Dubas stated the 1st will only be traded for a player with term, probably a smart move after the Foligno debacle....
3 cups, how many playoff series have the leafs won while the hawks were winning 3 cups?
How many weiner touches were the blackhawks doing?
I despise Simmons and no I didn't read his column, just my own thoughts.
Funny how closely your thoughts align with his.
Gordon Stuckless ring a bell?
Maple Leaf's present Boss a Classy guy Brendan Shanty Town Shanahan !!! How can anyone take the Leafs serious when this POS is in charge ? KARMA when the boss is such a rotten human being.Funny how all of these fans of other teams think their teams histories are squeaky clean.
I'm old, so i experienced the Harold Ballard years as a Leafs fan.....that's why i shall not cast stones...Funny how all of these fans of other teams think their teams histories are squeaky clean.
You mean like 50% retained?No team is going to give up a first for fleury without some sort of sweetener added ( considerable) or a bad contract going the other way.
I think it'd take more personally. But what do i know.You mean like 50% retained?
No team is going to give up a first for fleury without some sort of sweetener added ( considerable) or a bad contract going the other way.
Oh for sure was replying to another poster.That's why I suggested adding Mrazek. We'd have to move a goalie, Mrazek has 2 more years at 3.8M beyond this season. Late 1st + Mrazek + a late future pick. I don't think it's necessarily a "bad contract" it's about fair value for the level of goaltender he is but we live in a cap world.
Another great dufus signingIf Mrazek didn't have 2 more years remaining, then sure.
Funny how closely your thoughts align with his.